 |
Mon Sep 08 2008
|
|
|
Columns
Molly Ivins
Tort reform: not as simple as they'd like you to think
February 16, 2005
AUSTIN, Texas -- Sometimes the ironic timing of events in our public life is so striking as to cause one to wonder if the Great Scriptwriter in the Sky isn't trying to make a point. Thus, the word that the U.S. Senate voted for tort deform last week came just a few days after the news that seven executives of W.R. Grace and Co. were indicted on criminal charges for knowingly putting their workers and the public in danger by exposing them to asbestos ore.
Hundreds of miners, their family members and townsfolk in Libby, Mont., have died, and at least 1,200 more are sick from breathing the air polluted by the mine. Since the ore was shipped all over the country and was used as insulation in millions of homes, the total health effects are incalculable. The Seattle Post-Intelligencer deserves credit for bringing Grace to public attention with a series back in 1999.
The executives and the company were indicted on 10 counts of conspiracy, knowing endangerment, obstruction of justice and wire fraud.
W.R. Grace & Co. "categorically denies any criminal wrongdoing," said a spokesman.
The indictments and the P-I's series were based on tens of thousands of internal communications among the top health, marketing and legal managers at Grace about how to conceal the danger of asbestos in both the ore from the Libby mine and the products that were made from it. Their memos include discussion of how to keep investigators from studying the health of the miners, how to keep safety warnings off their products and how to hide the hazards of working with asbestos ore.
A lawyer with a Montana firm that has been trying to help families of the dead and dying for years said: "The prosecution cannot eliminate the death and disease in Libby. But there is comfort in the hope that criminal convictions will say to corporate America: Managers will be held criminally accountable if they lie and watch workers die."
According to an article in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, W.R. Grace filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 2001 because of a "sharply increasing number of asbestos claims." However, in 2002, the Justice Department intervened in a bankruptcy proceeding for the first time ever, alleging that before Grace asked for Chapter 11, it concealed money in new companies it bought. The Justice Department said it was a "fraudulent transfer" of money to protect itself from civil suits.
Just before the bankruptcy trial was to begin, Grace returned almost $1 billion to the bankruptcy court. The company currently has annual sales of about $2 billion, more than 6,000 employees and operations in nearly 40 companies.
On Feb. 2, President Bush again referred to "frivolous asbestos claims."
Against this timely reminder of what the tort system is designed to deter or punish, the Senate voted for the "Class Action Fairness Act" (love those cute names they keep giving rotten bills) 72 to 26. There is no "flood of frivolous lawsuits" -- in fact, tort claims are declining and only 2 percent of injured people ever sue for compensation to begin with.
Public Citizen did a study showing that corporations themselves file four times as many lawsuits as do individuals, and they are penalized much more often by judges for pursuing frivolous litigation. "Corporations think America is too litigious only when they are on the receiving end of a lawsuit," said Joan Claybrook, president of Public Citizen. "But when they feel aggrieved, businesses are far more likely to take their beef to court than are consumers."
The administration came up with a weird fix for this nonexistent problem (so reminiscent of nonexistent WMDs, the "crisis" in Social Security and other non-problems): It severely limited the right of individuals to file class-action suits against corporations by moving such cases from state courts to federal courts.
If the aggregate claim is over $5 million or the defendants and the plaintiffs are in separate states, the suit goes into the federal system -- and that definition pretty well encompasses all class-action suits. And federal judges are less likely to certify a group of aggrieved consumers as "a class" because such cases often involve conflicting state laws -- victims of a bad product can live in any state, and the company that made the product is often in another state.
On top of that, in case you haven't talked to any federal judges lately, the whole federal system is under-funded and overburdened now. The net effect is less accountability for corporations that violate health, safety, consumer and civil rights, and environmental laws. Happy Enron, WorldCom, Tyco and W.R. Grace to all.
This abominable bill was also much-sought by Republicans for nasty political reasons, which makes their rhetoric about justice all the more nauseating. It's a big win for the insurance industry and for big business, both heavy donors to Republicans. It also strips potential cases from trial lawyers, a group notoriously given to supporting the Democrats. How clever of Karl Rove.
Frankly, I think both the trial lawyers and big business can take care of themselves -- it's the rest of us I worry about.
***
CLARIFICATION: Writing about Social Security last week, I apparently confused some readers by saying that the money in the private accounts proposed by President Bush could, in fact, be taken away from you by means of the "clawback," the reduction of your Social Security benefits in direct ratio to the "loan" given you by the government plus 3 percent interest.
It is true, however, that the money in your private account is yours in the sense that should you be lucky enough to croak before you ever draw a nickel of Social Security, you can bequeath all the money in your private account to your heirs. The same is true of whatever is left in the account after you have been on Social Security for years.
You are the only one who experiences clawback through reduction of the amount you otherwise would have gotten from Social Security.
To find out more about Molly Ivins and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.
COPYRIGHT 2005 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.
Email this article to a friend
|
|
 | |
Don't forget to check out articles from 2007 and 2008 
Molly Ivins
"A moral issue" December 29, 2005
"This could scarcely be clearer" December 28, 2005
"Fantasy in Iraq" December 21, 2005
"Good old constitutional crisis" December 19, 2005
"Another mission accomplished" December 15, 2005
"Pre-procrastination Christmas booklist!" December 13, 2005
"Annual Christmas book list" December 6, 2005
"Talking for God, taking for personal gain" December 1, 2005
"Let's make lemonade this Thanksgiving" November 24, 2005
"Which Bush crony will be the next Brownie?" November 17, 2005
"Are they stupid, or are they lying?" November 14, 2005
"What have we become?" November 10, 2005
"The Brownie memos" November 8, 2005
"Worst legacy of the Bush years" November 3, 2005
"Leaping lightly" November 1, 2005
"Diane Wilson, magnificent unreasonableness" October 25, 2005
"How do we fix this mess?" October 20, 2005
"Good ideas on how to fix things" October 18, 2005
"Pensions" October 14, 2005
"Outrage of the Week" October 12, 2005
"The big picture" October 6, 2005
"Bunker Time: Harriet Miers" October 6, 2005
"Ronnie Earle, partisan fanatic?" September 30, 2005
"The KatrinaRita" September 27, 2005
"A giant snit" September 22, 2005
"Project Censored 2006" September 20, 2005
"The Bankruptcy Act and New Orleans" September 17, 2005
"Dear Dubya, Your Pal, Perry" September 15, 2005
"Where to look first" September 8, 2005
"Happy Labor Day, comrades" September 4, 2005
"Real consequences" September 1, 2005
"Solidarity Forev ... ooops, make that, Solidarity Later" September 1, 2005
"Blink" August 30, 2005
"The trouble with deregulation" August 27, 2005
"John Roberts and the Federalist Society*" July 27, 2005
"The AFL-CIO, CWC, SEIU, and tough SOBs" July 26, 2005
"We're missing the point" July 19, 2005
"Karl Rove, the CIA, and the media" July 14, 2005
"Eaten alive by corruption" July 7, 2005
""Progress" through economic interest" July 1, 2005
"The liberal straw man" June 28, 2005
"Follow the money" June 23, 2005
"PBS, CPB, and Republican bias" June 19, 2005
"Bush's high office appointments" June 15, 2005
"The Hyper Rich" June 8, 2005
"Indians pay conservative lobbyists to meet with Bush" June 7, 2005
"More fun from Texas" June 2, 2005
"Catapulting the propaganda" May 30, 2005
"The irony surplus" May 26, 2005
"National Laboratory for Bad Government" May 25, 2005
"The Koran and Guantanamo" May 18, 2005
"This is a revoltin" May 18, 2005
"Meanwhile, back in Iraq" May 10, 2005
"The current state of American energy policy" May 5, 2005
"Progressive indexing? Oh, you mean cutting Social Security benefits?" May 4, 2005
"Populist lagniappe" April 28, 2005
"The nuclear option and judicial activists" April 26, 2005
"John Bolton vote delay" April 21, 2005
"I like conservatives" April 19, 2005
"The real consequences of Tax Day" April 13, 2005
"Technical violations: oh, they're all related" April 12, 2005
"Non-parent in residence" April 5, 2005
"Hypocrisy, the U.S. and the U.N." April 1, 2005
"Truly crazy: the Cheney energy policy" March 29, 2005
"The Schiavo mistake" March 21, 2005
"This guy smells like a slop jar" March 16, 2005
"Government produced "news"" March 15, 2005
"Arrogant, humorless, self-righteous and confrontational" March 10, 2005
"Go, Byrd" March 7, 2005
"Bankruptcy Bill: A gift to big bankers and credit card companies" March 3, 2005
"They're at it again" March 1, 2005
"Yeah, it's really terrible what the president of Harvard said" February 24, 2005
"Fiscal nonsense" February 22, 2005
"Tort reform: not as simple as they'd like you to think" February 16, 2005
"The President's budget" February 16, 2005
"More bad news from Bush" February 10, 2005
"A no-brainer" February 8, 2005
"Divide between Bush's rhetoric and reality" February 3, 2005
"International election black clouds" February 1, 2005
"More complicated than George W. Bush thinks it is" January 28, 2005
""Private accounts" versus "personal accounts"" January 27, 2005
"What, do you want to insult Condoleezza Rice's integrity?" January 24, 2005
"Alternate reality" January 21, 2005
"Character" January 18, 2005
"A flat out whopper" January 13, 2005
"These people are slicker than bus station chili" January 11, 2005
"Prior-roarities" January 9, 2005
"Off to a bad start" January 3, 2005
Read Articles by Year: 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000

All content © 1970-2008 The Columbus Free Press Disclaimer |