Columns
Alexander Cockburn
Yes, it's reach-out time again
August 2, 2000
It's "Reach Out" time. It happens every four years. Someone gets up in
front of the Republicans and reminds the white people filling 95 percent of
the convention hall that the party has to reach out. Who better than Colin
Powell? He told the delegates in Philadelphia that it was time to "reach out
to minority communities and particularly the African-American community."
Then, he issued a warning: "The world is watching to see if all this power
and wealth is just for the well-to-do, the comfortable, the privileged."
Someone should give Gen. Powell the news. The facts are in. Power and
wealth in America are most definitely reserved for the privileged. At the
level of substantive policy, both the Democrats and the Republicans are in
cordial agreement on this point, with their only disagreement being how many
padlocks to set on the door to keep the unprivileged out.
Gen. Powell says the "world" is watching, an assertion I strongly doubt,
unless "world" is defined as being synonymous with the chairman of the
Federal Reserve, Alan Greenspan. It is true that Greenspan watches extremely
closely to ensure that no tiny increment of extra wealth seeps into the wage
packets of ordinary Americans. The moment it does, he terms the seepage
"inflationary," and jacks up interest rates.
Gen. Powell tells his party to reach out. In a couple of weeks, the
Democrats will boast that they have reached out, that America is a richer,
better place than it was at the end of 1992. The purpose of both conventions
is to hearten the faithful and to suggest to the rest of the country that
there is a healthy, two-party system at work, and that it would be a
terrible thing to waste your vote in November on Ralph Nader or Pat Buchanan
or any other candidate.
Indeed. Why squander your political energies over the next three months?
Why waste your vote in November? If you vote for Gore and he wins, then
what? Remember what happened when some of you voted for Bill Clinton in
1992? You got a president whose bold promise and bright expectations came to
a permanent halt four months after his inauguration, a collapse signaled by
the arrival in the White House of Reagan's man, David Gergen. Vice President
Al Gore was the man who typed out the press release announcing Gergen's
arrival. You could have voted for Bill, or you could have voted to keep
George Bush Sr. in four more years. It didn't make any difference. You
wasted your vote.
In fact, by the time he gave his presidential oath, Clinton's presidency,
as anything other than a vehicle for economic orthodoxy, was in the ditch.
Wall Street was duly acknowledged with a deficit reduction program, and the
"forgotten middle class" remembered with tax hikes.
Not content with throwing away your vote on Bill Clinton in 1992, some of
you did the same thing in 1996. Why? You didn't like Bob Dole. So, you voted
for Bill, and lo! you got Dole, anyway.
Now, don't think that Al Gore was running in and out of the Oval Office
trying to persuade Bill Clinton to do the decent thing, and that a vote for
Al will really and truly be a vote for something different. Study the
record. Bill Clinton occasionally remembered his better self. In that
traumatic spring of 1993, he roared out in frustration to his cabinet that
he hadn't been elected to have his agenda destroyed by a bunch of bond
traders. Gore's never had a better self to remember. Travel all the way back
to his very first race for Congress, in 1976. (Better still, travel to a
bookstore after Labor Day, and buy Al Gore: A User's Manual, by Alexander
Cockburn and Jeffrey St. Clair. You'll find the full record in there.)
At the substantive level, the two parties mostly offer an iron ceiling.
Does anyone really believe that any Republican administration will suddenly
decide to redistribute wealth down and not up? Or that Gore will load up the
Supreme Court with justices the caliber of William Douglas or Hugo Black,
tame the oil companies, and strike fear into the hearts of the corporate
malefactors? Real Gore, if he makes it into the Oval Office, will have to
get his judicial nominees past Orrin Hatch. If Douglas were around today,
Gore wouldn't nominate him, and the Senate wouldn't confirm him.
Real Gore ushered in David Gergen. Real Gore was Dick Morris's prime ally.
Real Gore was the man who gave Bill Clinton the decisive push on the welfare
vote. Real Gore worked, alongside Bill Clinton, with the Republicans, just
as Morris urged.
Want to look at Reorganizing Government, Gore's baby in 1993? He did things
the Reaganauts dreamed of in 1980 with the Office on Economic
Competitiveness and the Grace Commission, but would never have gotten past a
Democratic Congress. In the name of cutting red tape, he destroyed civil
service protections and opened the door wider to cronyism, racism and
looting of the public purse.
If Gen. Powell took his own advice seriously, he'd quit the sort of charade
he played earlier this week, and campaign for Ralph Nader.
To find out more about Alexander Cockburn and read features by other
columnists and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at
www.creators.com.
COPYRIGHT 2000 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.
Email this article to a friend
|
 |
Alexander Cockburn
"Remember the magnificent five" December 23, 2000
"Prime time coup" December 20, 2000
"Beyond the wasteland: The benefits of crisis" December 13, 2000
"Greens, fears and dollars " December 6, 2000
"What Seattle wrought " November 29, 2000
"Fair game" November 23, 2000
"Jim Crow at EPA: Driving Ms. Browner " November 22, 2000
"These happy days" November 14, 2000
"Why did 2.7 million greens stick with Nader? " November 10, 2000
"The arch-Druid passes: David Brower, 1912-2000 " November 6, 2000
"Get Nader!" November 1, 2000
"A vote for Nader is a vote for..." October 25, 2000
"'The handshake': Clinton's mid-east legacy " October 18, 2000
"Al Gore's Nader problem: Progressives are ready to be spoilers " October 10, 2000
"Gore and his reinventions " September 27, 2000
"The disgrace of the New York Times" September 20, 2000
"The Gore's culture wars" September 13, 2000
"God talk" September 1, 2000
"The Pentagon auctions the presidency" August 29, 2000
"The new age of prudery" August 22, 2000
"Who is Al Gore?" August 16, 2000
"Gore, Lieberman and revenge of the press prudes" August 4, 2000
"Yes, it's reach-out time again" August 2, 2000
"The truth about Clintonomics" July 26, 2000
"Democrats frantic about Nader" July 19, 2000
"Gore, Bush and the Supreme Court" July 12, 2000
"Nike's non-profit friends" July 5, 2000
"A meat column for July fourth" June 30, 2000
"The magnificent eleven" June 28, 2000
"Gays and the 'Hate Crimes' folly" June 21, 2000
"Don't wear a veil in Philadelphia (or a beard)" June 14, 2000
"Wolfe's yap" May 30, 2000
"Against summer" May 26, 2000
"McCaffrey's wars" May 24, 2000
"Off-leash! Dog politics" May 17, 2000
"No closure on disenfranchisement " May 14, 2000
"Al Gore's war on crime" May 10, 2000
"Drug war/police state" May 3, 2000
"Elian - This is how we do things here" April 26, 2000
"NPR and NAB ally to crush low power radio" April 19, 2000
"To make mistakes is glorious" April 12, 2000
"Balls and chains - gays and marriage" April 5, 2000
"Hold that nun-killer!" March 29, 2000
"Eugenics: The impulse never dies" March 8, 2000
"The war on youth" March 1, 2000
"Jeorg Haider's Reeboks" February 23, 2000
"Don't blame the IRA for the Ulster veto" February 16, 2000
"George Bush and the smell of death" February 2, 2000
"Who won the war on crime? " January 19, 2000
"New millennium, old crime: those sanctions against Iraq " January 12, 2000
"The Future Past " January 5, 2000
Read Articles by Year: 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 |