 |
Sat Nov 22 2008
|
|
|
Columns
Alexander Cockburn
Nike's non-profit friends
July 5, 2000
There was an affecting moment, back in 1996, when Bill Clinton and Phil
Knight of Nike clasped each other warmly in the Rose Garden, and hailed the
birth of the Apparel Industry Partnership. At his best, as always when
enjoying consummations, President Bill hailed the partnership as "an
unprecedented coming together" of industry, labor, church and human rights
groups, united in their resolve to confront the issue of labor exploitation
in sweatshops overseas. Companies abiding by a code of conduct would be
rewarded with a "No Sweat" label.
Two years rolled by, and the Apparel Industry Partnership gave birth to a
lovely child, the Fair Labor Association. News stories did not dwell on the
fact that the labor rep on the partnership, UNITE, and the largest church
group, the Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility, had both quit,
protesting the failure of the group to consider the explosive topics of
wages and the right to organize.
In fact, the final document laying out the mandate and protocols of the
Fair Labor Association was largely drafted by lawyers for Nike and by
Michael Posner, executive director of the New York-based Lawyers Committee
for Human Rights, an outfit whose scrupulous objectivity on issues of
corporate responsibility was advertised by the presence on its board at the
time of lawyers from Patton, Boggs; Akin Gump; Skadden, Arps; Williams and
Connolly; Arnold and Porter. Further luster was added by the presence on the
Lawyers Committee advisory board of reps from Reebok, the Gap, Liz Claiborne
and Disney.
The drafters did their work well. Information on overseas factories would
be kept secret. Better still, a company could win a "No Sweat" endorsement
for one product, even if 95 percent of its total output was put together in
a slave camp. Twenty months have rolled by since the Fair Labor Association
was set up, and they have not been trouble-free for Nike and its campaign to
portray itself as a zealous custodian of workers' interests, although you
wouldn't know this from the Fair Labor Association.
Indeed, the very fact that one could hear nothing disobliging about Nike
from this quarter prompted students across the country to protest
involvement by their universities with the association. Among those students
was a group at the University of Oregon. When Knight heard this, he withdrew
a $30 million donation to the university, prompting school president, Dave
Frohnmayer, to issue repeated descriptions of Nike as a "world leader" in
promoting fair labor. There are few so eloquent as university presidents
when they see bequests slipping through their fingers. The Eugene Weekly, on
the other hand, has risen splendidly to the occasion with a fine resume by
Alan Pittman of Nike's recent outrageous conduct and PR gyrations.
In April, a coalition of fair labor groups put out a report about terrible
working conditions at Nike contract factories in Indonesia, Thailand,
Cambodia and China. Punishment for minor infractions by workers have
included slaps and fines. Some workers have been forced to stand in the sun
or run laps round the plant. In Chinese factories, there's forced overtime,
12 hours a day, seven days a week. (The coalition's report says Nike has
increased China's slice of its overall sneaker production from 10 percent to
40 percent in recent years; a wage of 11 cents an hour is an attractive
inducement.)
Let's return now to the Fair Labor Association. Why the silence on Nike?
After all, it has not just corporate lawyers but nonprofits on its board:
the Robert F. Kennedy Memorial and the National Consumers League, in
addition to the Lawyers Committee.
For illumination, we can turn to the Washington-based Nonprofit Watch,
which tells us that since the formation of the Apparel Industry Partnership,
there has been a "specific increase in apparel industry companies donating
to the group."
The National Consumers League gets contributions from companies such as Liz
Claiborne. As for the Robert F. Kennedy Memorial, it has accepted funding
from Nike, the Gap and Levi Strauss. Richard Donohue, who has been at
various times in his 23-year career at Nike president, chief operating
officer, and most recently, vice chairman, has been a 40-year intimate of
the Kennedy family. It's the way of the world. Another sweatshopper, Kathie
Lee Gifford, is a Kennedy in-law.
We need Marcel Proust to evoke the corruptions of this aristocracy.
To find out more about Alexander Cockburn and read features by other
columnists and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at
www.creators.com.
COPYRIGHT 2000 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.
Email this article to a friend
|
|
 | |
Don't forget to check out articles from 2007 and 2008 
Alexander Cockburn
"Remember the magnificent five" December 23, 2000
"Prime time coup" December 20, 2000
"Beyond the wasteland: The benefits of crisis" December 13, 2000
"Greens, fears and dollars " December 6, 2000
"What Seattle wrought " November 29, 2000
"Fair game" November 23, 2000
"Jim Crow at EPA: Driving Ms. Browner " November 22, 2000
"These happy days" November 14, 2000
"Why did 2.7 million greens stick with Nader? " November 10, 2000
"The arch-Druid passes: David Brower, 1912-2000 " November 6, 2000
"Get Nader!" November 1, 2000
"A vote for Nader is a vote for..." October 25, 2000
"'The handshake': Clinton's mid-east legacy " October 18, 2000
"Al Gore's Nader problem: Progressives are ready to be spoilers " October 10, 2000
"Gore and his reinventions " September 27, 2000
"The disgrace of the New York Times" September 20, 2000
"The Gore's culture wars" September 13, 2000
"God talk" September 1, 2000
"The Pentagon auctions the presidency" August 29, 2000
"The new age of prudery" August 22, 2000
"Who is Al Gore?" August 16, 2000
"Gore, Lieberman and revenge of the press prudes" August 4, 2000
"Yes, it's reach-out time again" August 2, 2000
"The truth about Clintonomics" July 26, 2000
"Democrats frantic about Nader" July 19, 2000
"Gore, Bush and the Supreme Court" July 12, 2000
"Nike's non-profit friends" July 5, 2000
"A meat column for July fourth" June 30, 2000
"The magnificent eleven" June 28, 2000
"Gays and the 'Hate Crimes' folly" June 21, 2000
"Don't wear a veil in Philadelphia (or a beard)" June 14, 2000
"Wolfe's yap" May 30, 2000
"Against summer" May 26, 2000
"McCaffrey's wars" May 24, 2000
"Off-leash! Dog politics" May 17, 2000
"No closure on disenfranchisement " May 14, 2000
"Al Gore's war on crime" May 10, 2000
"Drug war/police state" May 3, 2000
"Elian - This is how we do things here" April 26, 2000
"NPR and NAB ally to crush low power radio" April 19, 2000
"To make mistakes is glorious" April 12, 2000
"Balls and chains - gays and marriage" April 5, 2000
"Hold that nun-killer!" March 29, 2000
"Eugenics: The impulse never dies" March 8, 2000
"The war on youth" March 1, 2000
"Jeorg Haider's Reeboks" February 23, 2000
"Don't blame the IRA for the Ulster veto" February 16, 2000
"George Bush and the smell of death" February 2, 2000
"Who won the war on crime? " January 19, 2000
"New millennium, old crime: those sanctions against Iraq " January 12, 2000
"The Future Past " January 5, 2000
Read Articles by Year: 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000

All content © 1970-2008 The Columbus Free Press Disclaimer |