Wisconsin: None dare call it vote rigging
June 14, 2012
If vote-rigging prospers, none may call it vote-rigging. It simply becomes the new norm. Once again, the universal laws of statistics apply only outside U.S. borders. The recall vote in Wisconsin produced another significant 7% discrepancy between the unadjusted exit poll and the so-called "recorded vote." In actual social science, this level of discrepancy, with the results being so far outside the expected margin of error would not be accepted.
When I took Ph.D. statistics to secure my doctorate in political science, we were taught to work through the rubric, sometime referred to as HISMISTER. The "H" stood for an explanation of the discrepancy rooted in some historical intervention, such as one of the candidates being caught in a public restroom with his pants down and a "wide stance" soliciting an undercover cop. The "I" that came next suggested we should check our instrumentation, that is, are the devices adequately reporting the data?
Here's where U.S. elections become laughable. A couple of private companies, count our votes with secret proprietary hardware and software, the most notable being ES&S. Every standard of election transparency is routinely violated in the U.S. electronic version of faith-based voting. How the corporate-dominated media deals with the issue is by "adjusting the exit polls." They simply assume the recorded vote on easily hacked and programmed private machines are correct and that the international gold standard for detecting election fraud exit polls must be wrong.
They are not going to go through the rest of the acronym and check to see if the Sample makes sense, that the right Measurements are being taken, or whether or not there's been a breakdown in Implementing the exit polling. They won't check to see if the representative Size of the polling numbers are accurate, or if there are problems with the pollster's Technique, or if there was human Error, or if there's just bad Recording going on.
Of course, the machines could be recording wrong because they are programmed for an incorrect outcome. The easiest people to convince regarding the absurdity of electronic voting with private proprietary hardware and software are the computer programmers across the political spectrum. Statisticians and mathematicians also readily comprehend the obvious nature of rigged elections.
One of my favorite mathematicians is Richard Charnin, who on his website using readily available public information, calculates the odds of the so-called red shift" occurring from the 1988 to 2008 presidential elections. The red shift refers to the overwhelming pick up of votes by the Republican Party in recorded votes over what actual voters report to exit pollsters. See Richard Charnin's article
In Charnin's analysis of exit poll data, we can say with a 95% confidence level that means in 95 out of 100 elections that the exit polls will fall within a statistically predictable margin of error. Charnin looked at 300 presidential state exit polls from 1988 to 2008, 15 state elections would be expected to fall outside the margin of error. Shockingly, 137 of the 300 state presidential exit polls fell outside the margin of error.
What is the probability of this happening?
"One in one million trillion trillion trlllion trillion trillion trillion," said Charnin.
More statistical proof of Republican operatives, zealots and sympathizers tampering with the vote is found in the fact that 132 of the elections fell outside the margin in favor of the GOP. We would expect eight.
Say you have a fair coin to flip. We would expect that if we flip that coin there would be an even split between heads and tails or in this case, Republicans and Democrats. Election results falling outside the margin of error should be equally split between both parties. Yet, only five times, less than expected, did the extra votes fall in the direction of the Democratic Party.
So what are the odds? According to Charnin, of 132 out of 300 state presidential elections exceeding the margin of error in the direction of the Republicans one in 600 trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion.
The corporate-owned media does not want to mention that the problems with the exit polls began with the ascendancy of the former CIA Director George Herbert Walker Bush to the presidency in 1988. It is also that year when the non-transparent push-and-pray voting machines were introduced in the New Hampshire primary by Bush ally John Sununu. Bush, who rigged elections for the CIA throughout the Third World did unexpectedly well where the voting machines were brought in.
In any other election outside the U.S., the U.S. State Department would condemn the use of the these highly riggable machines based on the discrepancy in the exit polls. It's predictable what would happen if an anti-U.S. KGB agent in some former Soviet Central Asian republic picked up an unexplained 5% of the votes at odds with the exit polls. A new election would be called for, as it was in the Ukraine in 2004. We would not have accepted the reported vote from the corrupt intelligence officer.
The CIA Director's son wins with laughable exit poll discrepancies in 2000 and 2004 and the mainstream media sees no evil. The media's perspective is to discredit the exit polls, which they sponsor, and call any who points to the unadjusted, or actual, polls "conspiracy theorists."
In 2004, 22 states had a red shift to the CIA Director's son, George W. Bush. Usually such improbably results are signs of a Banana Republic. Now we have a too-close-to-call neck and neck recall race in Wisconsin that show an obvious red shift for a right-wing red governor. Nobody wants to look at the non-transparent black box machines. Electronic election rigging has prospered. Democracy is dead. Long live the "adjusted" vote totals.
Bob Fitrakis has a Ph.D. in political science and a J.D. He is an election law attorney, professor, and has written four books on election integrity.
Originally published by The Free Press, Free Press
Email this article to a friend
"Election Protection Observers point out how the system is broken in Ohio"
December 15, 2012
"Why Rove failed to deliver Ohio on Election Day: What happened in Ohio this time around"
November 12, 2012
"Who Counts in Ohio?"
November 4, 2012
"Mountains of evidence on election tampering documented in book on election integrity movement"
October 5, 2012
"On the 50th anniversary: The Other America "
September 30, 2012
September 13, 2012
"Reverend Moon: Cult leader, CIA asset, and Bush family friend is dead"
September 4, 2012
"Whats wrong with Wisconsin?"
August 15, 2012
"Defender of Democracy -- In Memoriam: Gore Vidal (1925-2012)"
August 1, 2012
"Wisconsin: None dare call it vote rigging "
June 14, 2012
"Taking us back to 1851: Far Right Law Center seeks to bring SB5 battle to local Ohio governments"
June 8, 2012
"No need for NATO"
May 28, 2012
"From the Kent State killings to Occupy Cleveland, this is the face of the new COINTELPRO"
May 5, 2012
"The Free Press uncovers one million voters purged in Ohio"
April 15, 2012
"Will "push and pray" voting prevail in 2012? The private companies behind the curtain: The great and powerful advocates of faith-based electronic voting"
April 11, 2012
"Koch brothers corporate takeover of the Ohio Tea Party"
March 26, 2012
"Illegal NATO-sponsored coup in Libya enters its predictable "blowback" stage"
March 4, 2012
"Repeal voter suppression bill HB 194, Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted says"
January 29, 2012
"Watch the outsourcing of votes today in South Carolina!"
January 21, 2012
"The new CHAOS, COINTELPRO and the Occupy movement"
January 5, 2012
Read Articles by Year:
2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000