 |
Sat Aug 30 2008
|
|
|
Columns
Dr. Manning Marable
Halt the machinery of death
February 2, 2000
The cruelest example of human rights violations in the United States
today is the death penalty. Everyone knows that the death penalty is
not now, nor has it ever been, a deterrent to violent crime. Social
scientists for decades have long established that the death penalty is
inherently racist. African-American defendants found guilty of the
identical crime as a white defendant are statistically at least four
times more likely to be given the death penalty. Black people currently
comprise more than 40 percent of death row inmates. Regional
differences make it 160 times more likely that a person convicted of a
capital offense in the South will be executed than one in the
Northeast. And of course, the capital justice system can never
guarantee that innocent people won't be executed by the state. For
these and other reasons, the U.S. Supreme Court, in the 1972 case of
Furman v. Georgia, outlawed capital punishment.
Since the death penalty was reinstated in 1976, there has been mounting
legal evidence that capital punishment cannot be implemented in a fair
and impartial manner. The state of Illinois, for example, currently has
161 people on death row. Since 1977, 12 people in Illinois have been
executed, but 13 on death row were proven to have been wrongly
convicted. Several death row prisoners in Illinois were freed after a
Northwestern University journalism class proved that they were innocent
and that others had actually committed the crimes.
The Chicago Tribune recently examined the almost 300 cases in Illinois
during the past 23 years, in which the death penalty was rendered.
About one half of the 260 cases that were appealed were ultimately
reversed in favor of new trials or sentencing hearings. In at least
thirty cases, the Chicago Tribune uncovered that defendants in capital
cases had been represented by attorneys who were disbarred or suspended
from legal practice.
This overwhelming evidence that innocent people were being executed in
the state prompted Illinois Governor George Ryan, a Republican, to order
a halt on the use of the death penalty. Ryan is a long-time supporter
of capital punishment. But as he explained to the press, "I now favor a
moratorium, because I have grave concerns about our state's shameful
record of convicting innocent people and putting them on death row."
The opposite extreme on the political spectrum from Ryan is represented
by another Republican, Texas Governor George W. Bush. A self-proclaimed
"compassionate conservative," Bush has been downright vicious in his
implementation of capital punishment. In six short years, Bush has
presided over the executions of more than one hundred people-and
according to him, every single one of them was guilty.
A recent New York Times article by Stephen B. Bright, the director of
the Southern Center for Human Rights in Atlanta, illustrates how the
Texas "assembly-line process" for dispatching people to the "execution
chamber" works. Texas has no public defender system, and attorneys who
have little or no experience in the defense of capital cases are
assigned. They are often unable to retain independent investigators to
review the evidence necessary to provide proof of a defendant's
innocence. Bright notes, "The Texas courts do not even require that
defense counsels remain awake during trials." In several capital cases,
defense attorneys actually fell asleep, and the defendants were
sentenced to death. One of those convicted, Carl Johnson, was executed
in 1995.
The struggle to halt the execution of America's most prominent
political prisoner, African-American journalist Mumia Abu-Jamal, has
helped to spark a grassroots movement to end capital punishment.
Legislatures in 16 of the 38 states with death penalty laws have or are
reviewing moratoriums on executions. Eight cities have called for a
halt to capital punishment, of which the most significant is
Philadelphia. Last month, in a 12 to 4 vote, Philadelphia's City
Council approved a resolution demanding a two-year moratorium on
implementing the death penalty, and called for the creation of a new
state commission to study Pennsylvania's capital punishment. Democratic
City Councilwoman Donna Miller, who introduced the resolution, observed
that "90 percent of the people on Pennsylvania's death row are people
who cannot afford legal counsel, and 90 percent of those from
Philadelphia are people of color."
In Congress, Democratic U.S. Senator Russ Feingold has called on the
Clinton administration to issue a similar moratorium on all federal
executions. Feingold explained that "the problems of inadequate
representation, lack of access to DNA testing, police misconduct, racial
bias and even simple errors are not unique to Illinois. These are
problems that have plagued the administration of capital punishment
around the country since the reinstatement of capital punishment almost
a quarter century ago." Several months before Feingold's public
challenge, Attorney General Janet Reno authorized a review to determine
if racial disparities exist in federal capital punishment cases.
These hopeful signs provide encouragement to those of us who have
always opposed the death penalty. But we must take the struggle to halt
capital punishment to the next level. We should challenge elected
officials who are soliciting our votes in the fall 2000 elections to
have the political and moral decency to support the death penalty
moratorium. In the words of Supreme Court Associate Justice Harry
Blackman, we must halt once and for all the "machinery of death."
Dr. Manning Marable is Professor of History and Political Science, and
the Director of the Institute for Research in African-American Studies,
Columbia University. "Along the Color Line" is distributed free of
charge to over 325 publications throughout the U.S. and
internationally. Dr. Marable's column is also available on the Internet
at www.manningmarable.net.
Email this article to a friend
|
|
 | |
Don't forget to check out articles from 2007 and 2008 
Dr. Manning Marable
"'Vote Strategically: For Nader' -- Part Two of Two" October 31, 2000
"'Education Works, Prisons don't' Harlem teach-in" October 30, 2000
"'Vote Strategically: For Nader' -- Part One of Two" October 30, 2000
"Who is Joe Lieberman?" September 1, 2000
"Escaping from Blackness: Racial identity and public policy" September 1, 2000
"Imprisoning Black Minds: Neoliberalism and Education Apartheid" August 11, 2000
"'Racism, Prisons and the Future of Black America' -- Part One of Two" August 1, 2000
"'Racism, Prisons and the Future of Black America' -- Part Two of Two" August 1, 2000
"The 2000 Presidential Election: History, Ideology and Race" July 1, 2000
"George W. Bush: The illusion of inclusion" July 1, 2000
"Halt the machinery of death" February 2, 2000
"White supremacy in Dixie" February 1, 2000
"Seattle and beyond: making the connection in the 21st century" January 2, 2000
"No rights whites must respect" January 1, 2000
Read Articles by Year: 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000

All content © 1970-2008 The Columbus Free Press Disclaimer |