 |
Fri Nov 21 2008
|
|
|
Columns
Norman Solomon
George Orwell's unhappy birthday
June 29, 2000
George Orwell's birthday passed without notice recently. Born on June 25,
1903, the great English writer has been dead for half a century, but
Orwellian language lives on.
These days we have plenty of good reasons to echo poet W.H. Auden: "Oh,
how I wish that Orwell were still alive, so that I could read his comments
on contemporary events!"
Today, in the United States, media coverage of political discourse attests
to Orwell's observation that language "becomes ugly and inaccurate because
our thoughts are foolish, but the slovenliness of our language makes it
easier for us to have foolish thoughts."
News media frequently make things worse. Instead of scrutinizing the
blather, reporters are inclined to solemnly relay it -- while adding some
of their own.
The standard jargon of U.S. politics is the type of facile rhetoric that
appalled Orwell. This lexicon derives its power from unexamined repetition.
To carry on Orwell's efforts, we should question the media buzzwords that
swarm all around us. For instance:
- Centrist: A term of endearment in elite circles, usually affixed to
politicians who don't rock boats, even ones stuck in stagnant waters.
- Reform: This word once described change aimed at removing corruption
or privilege. Now the word offers a favorable sheen to any policy shift. A
linguistic loophole vague and gaping enough to drive a truck through,
whatever the political cargo.
- Bipartisan: An adjective that hails the two major parties for showing
great unity and national purpose, usually agreed to behind closed doors,
out of view of the riff-raff.
- Special interests: A negative label commonly applied to mass
constituencies of millions of people -- seniors, the poor, racial
minorities, union members, feminists, gays... Formerly a pejorative to
describe monied interests that used dollars -- since they lacked numbers of
people -- to influence politics.
- Sources say: Leaks from on high, served up as journalistic champagne.
- Experts: Oft-cited and carefully selected, they supply fertilizer for
the next harvests of popular credulity.
- Defense budget: Having precious little to do with actual defense of
the country, these expenditures require the most innocent of names.
- Senior U.S. officials: Unnamed, they are larger than life. In another
culture they might be called "messengers of God."
- Rule of law: What occurs when those who made the rules lay down the
law, sometimes violently, overseas or at home.
- National security: An ever-ready rationale for just about any
diplomatic or military maneuver... or any suppression of incriminating
information.
- Stability in the region: Can be a tidy phrase to justify the
continuation of existing horrors.
- Western diplomats: These bastions of patience and wisdom provide the
compass for navigating in foreign geopolitical waters.
- The West: Often used as a synonym for global forces of good.
George Orwell wrote his last novel, 1984, in the late 1940s -- around
the time the U.S. "War Department" became the "Defense Department."
Orwell's novel anticipated that "the special function of certain Newspeak
words" would be "not so much to express meanings as to destroy them."
The repetition of such words and phrases is never-ending. Like a constant
drip on a stone, the cumulative effects are enormous.
Language, dialogue and debate are essential tools for a democratic
process. But when words are wielded as blunt instruments, they bludgeon our
minds rather than enhancing them.
The inflated shadow cast by words has grown in recent decades, but it is
not new. "Identification of word with thing," Stuart Chase noted in 1938,
"is well illustrated in the child's remark 'Pigs are rightly named, since
they are such dirty animals.'"
Words and phrases, never better than imprecise symbols, come to dominate
the conceptual scenery -- maps that are confused with the land itself. All
too often, familiar words are used to label ideas and events instead of
exploring them.
And over the years, evasive and euphemistic language -- from "pacification
programs" in Vietnam to "collateral damage" (killed civilians) in Iraq --
has served as camouflage for inhuman policies.
George Orwell died young, succumbing to tuberculosis in 1950. But his
acuity can be brought to life, to the extent that we probe beneath all the
facile words and search out the realities they so often obscure.
Norman Solomon's book The Habits of Highly Deceptive Media won the 1999
George Orwell Award for Distinguished Contribution to Honesty and Clarity
in Public Language, presented by the National Council of Teachers of English.
Email this article to a friend
|
|
 | |
Don't forget to check out articles from 2007 and 2008 
Norman Solomon
"And now, the P.U.-litzer Prizes for 2000" December 23, 2000
"Media crucial as Bush faces 'Legitimacy Gap'" December 17, 2000
"How to improve on the feats of network news" December 8, 2000
"A dire shortage of pre-inaugural schlock" November 30, 2000
"Finally: A Huge Media Spectacle That Really Matters?" November 23, 2000
"Public wiser than pundits in post-election uproar" November 16, 2000
"Arrogance of TV Networks: Compounding a national crisis" November 9, 2000
"New Democrats: Maybe the jig is up" November 2, 2000
"Resistance to a tightening grip of censorship" October 26, 2000
"The debates: Truth is stranger than science fiction" October 19, 2000
"Media spin remains in sync with Israeli occupation" October 13, 2000
"Our debts to new media technology" October 6, 2000
"Level the playing field: What a media concept!" September 29, 2000
"Dr. Laura gets a TV show-but at what cost?" September 7, 2000
"When watchdogs have a blind spot - for themselves" August 31, 2000
"Paying homage to the Two-Party Media System" August 24, 2000
"The Deception Convention: Don't stop winking about tomorrow" August 17, 2000
"Holy smoke and mirrors: the rise of centrist theocrats" August 10, 2000
"The Pleasantville party floats on a media cloud" August 2, 2000
"Convention hospitality and police brutality" July 24, 2000
"The easy media politics of optimism" July 19, 2000
"And now, an all-new episode of 'Media Jeopardy!'" July 13, 2000
"Nader raises hackles of media establishment" July 6, 2000
"George Orwell's unhappy birthday" June 29, 2000
"The Los Alamos story: spinning like crazy" June 22, 2000
"The case for corporate-given names" June 15, 2000
"Can 'E-government' bring us point-and-click democracy?" June 8, 2000
"Campaign forecast: A long hot summer of punditry" June 1, 2000
"U.S. news media: A security zone for Israel" May 25, 2000
"Virtual Commandments of the dot.com faith" May 18, 2000
"Overcoming the hazards of media monoculture" May 11, 2000
"Ad industry: Giving women special treatment " May 3, 2000
"Break up Microsoft? . . . Then how about the media 'Big Six?'" April 27, 2000
"When Corporate Media Cover 'Independent Media'" April 20, 2000
"Protests in Washington clash with media spin" April 13, 2000
"From the news media to Elian, with love" April 6, 2000
"Mickey Mouse network participates in abuse" March 30, 2000
"Broadcasters celebrate big gains from violence and greed" March 26, 2000
"A season of news coverage: No cure for political blues" March 25, 2000
"The power and limits of photojournalism" March 23, 2000
"The media’s lethal injection of numbing" March 16, 2000
"Self-censorship is shadowing the new media era" March 3, 2000
"Reporting on bloodshed, TV journalists play dumb" March 2, 2000
"Dr. Laura: Radio’s leading anti-gay zealot" February 24, 2000
"NPR floats an ombudsman, but problems run deep" February 17, 2000
"E-Vandalism intrudes on the power to be heard" February 10, 2000
"Fine journalism deserves a lot more attention" February 3, 2000
"Bill Bradley, news media and 'The Politics of Ambiguity'" January 27, 2000
"Aol Time Warner: calling the faithful to their knees" January 14, 2000
"What happened to the 'Information Superhighway'?" January 7, 2000
Read Articles by Year: 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000

All content © 1970-2008 The Columbus Free Press Disclaimer |