 |
Fri Nov 21 2008
|
|
|
Columns
Norman Solomon
Fine journalism deserves a lot more attention
February 3, 2000
Time magazine recently offered some notable journalism. A 14-page
investigative report -- "Big Money and Politics: Who Gets Hurt?" --
provided extensive coverage of how government decisions really get made in
the nation's capital. The cover story, by Donald Barlett and James Steele,
was terrific.
But the mass media's response to the new expose was dismal.
Barlett and Steele don't bother with the fluff and psychoblather that
dominate political reporting. They bypass the styles and personal traits of
politicians. Instead, in the Feb. 7 issue of Time, the two journalists
illuminate a process that normally remains in shadows. Money doesn't talk.
It screams. And it gets heard.
The crux of the real story is that "Washington extends favorable treatment
to one set of citizens at the expense of another," Barlett and Steele
write. For those with megabucks behind them, the doors swing wide. For
others, the portals of democracy are unlikely to open more than a crack.
"If you know the right people in Congress and in the White House, you can
often get anything you want. And there are two surefire ways to get close
to those people: Contribute to their political campaigns. Spend generously
on lobbying."
As a case study of how big money purchases big favors, Time devotes
several pages to shrewd efforts by Carl Lindner, the chair of Chiquita
Brands International. He poured a few million dollars into the coffers of
key politicians in Washington, while U.S. trade policies vital to his
firm's banana fortunes hung in the balance.
People who send large checks to politicians and top lobbyists "enjoy all
the benefits of their special status," Barlett and Steele explain. For
example: "If they make a bad business decision, the government bails them
out. If they want to hire workers at below-market wage rates, the
government provides the means to do so. If they want more time to pay their
debts, the government gives them an extension. If they want immunity from
certain laws, the government gives it."
Meanwhile, lacking deep pockets, most Americans "pick up a
disproportionate share of America's tax bill ... pay higher prices for a
broad range of products, from peanuts to prescription drugs ... pay taxes
that others in a similar situation have been excused from paying ... are
compelled to abide by laws while others are granted immunity from them..."
The well-documented account of "Big Money and Politics" couldn't be more
timely. As Barlett and Steele note, "In this presidential election year,
companies and industries that hope for special treatment in the new decade
are busy making their political contributions and their connections."
The fact that such intrepid journalism made a splash in Time magazine is
encouraging. But other media -- including wire services, big daily
newspapers and broadcast networks -- failed to pick up on the superb cover
story. Days later, no interview with Barlett or Steele had aired on any
major TV or radio outlets. (One segment was apparently in the works for
CNN, also owned by Time Warner.) In effect, national media reacted with a
yawn.
Compare that non-response to what happened in mid-December -- eight months
after the Columbine High tragedy -- when Time printed a cover story about
videotapes made by the young killers, Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold. The
night before publication, CNN aired an interview with Timothy Roche, the
Time reporter who had seen the videos. Within hours, interview footage of
him appeared on dozens of local TV newscasts across the country. But that
was just a start.
The day that the magazine went on sale, ABC's "Good Morning America"
featured a long interview with Roche. ("Good to have you here," host
Charles Gibson greeted his guest. "I was just reading your excerpts. It
strikes me these boys were psychopaths. But your impression?")
Simultaneously, on NBC's "Today" show, Katie Couric discussed the same
subject at length with another Time reporter, Nancy Gibbs. Later in the
day, CNN repeatedly aired portions of its interview with Roche, while CNBC
used tape of both Roche and Gibbs.
Not to be outdone by commercial shlockmeisters, National Public Radio's
"All Things Considered" devoted a segment that evening to an interview with
Roche, who reprised his description of the killers' videos.
"At times you think they must be high on drugs," he said, "and at times
you think they must be evil or possessed."
That's how you might view the gatekeepers who decide which stories should
reverberate in the national media's echo chamber.
Norman Solomon is a syndicated columnist. His latest book is The Habits of Highly Deceptive Media.
Email this article to a friend
|
|
 | |
Don't forget to check out articles from 2007 and 2008 
Norman Solomon
"And now, the P.U.-litzer Prizes for 2000" December 23, 2000
"Media crucial as Bush faces 'Legitimacy Gap'" December 17, 2000
"How to improve on the feats of network news" December 8, 2000
"A dire shortage of pre-inaugural schlock" November 30, 2000
"Finally: A Huge Media Spectacle That Really Matters?" November 23, 2000
"Public wiser than pundits in post-election uproar" November 16, 2000
"Arrogance of TV Networks: Compounding a national crisis" November 9, 2000
"New Democrats: Maybe the jig is up" November 2, 2000
"Resistance to a tightening grip of censorship" October 26, 2000
"The debates: Truth is stranger than science fiction" October 19, 2000
"Media spin remains in sync with Israeli occupation" October 13, 2000
"Our debts to new media technology" October 6, 2000
"Level the playing field: What a media concept!" September 29, 2000
"Dr. Laura gets a TV show-but at what cost?" September 7, 2000
"When watchdogs have a blind spot - for themselves" August 31, 2000
"Paying homage to the Two-Party Media System" August 24, 2000
"The Deception Convention: Don't stop winking about tomorrow" August 17, 2000
"Holy smoke and mirrors: the rise of centrist theocrats" August 10, 2000
"The Pleasantville party floats on a media cloud" August 2, 2000
"Convention hospitality and police brutality" July 24, 2000
"The easy media politics of optimism" July 19, 2000
"And now, an all-new episode of 'Media Jeopardy!'" July 13, 2000
"Nader raises hackles of media establishment" July 6, 2000
"George Orwell's unhappy birthday" June 29, 2000
"The Los Alamos story: spinning like crazy" June 22, 2000
"The case for corporate-given names" June 15, 2000
"Can 'E-government' bring us point-and-click democracy?" June 8, 2000
"Campaign forecast: A long hot summer of punditry" June 1, 2000
"U.S. news media: A security zone for Israel" May 25, 2000
"Virtual Commandments of the dot.com faith" May 18, 2000
"Overcoming the hazards of media monoculture" May 11, 2000
"Ad industry: Giving women special treatment " May 3, 2000
"Break up Microsoft? . . . Then how about the media 'Big Six?'" April 27, 2000
"When Corporate Media Cover 'Independent Media'" April 20, 2000
"Protests in Washington clash with media spin" April 13, 2000
"From the news media to Elian, with love" April 6, 2000
"Mickey Mouse network participates in abuse" March 30, 2000
"Broadcasters celebrate big gains from violence and greed" March 26, 2000
"A season of news coverage: No cure for political blues" March 25, 2000
"The power and limits of photojournalism" March 23, 2000
"The media’s lethal injection of numbing" March 16, 2000
"Self-censorship is shadowing the new media era" March 3, 2000
"Reporting on bloodshed, TV journalists play dumb" March 2, 2000
"Dr. Laura: Radio’s leading anti-gay zealot" February 24, 2000
"NPR floats an ombudsman, but problems run deep" February 17, 2000
"E-Vandalism intrudes on the power to be heard" February 10, 2000
"Fine journalism deserves a lot more attention" February 3, 2000
"Bill Bradley, news media and 'The Politics of Ambiguity'" January 27, 2000
"Aol Time Warner: calling the faithful to their knees" January 14, 2000
"What happened to the 'Information Superhighway'?" January 7, 2000
Read Articles by Year: 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000

All content © 1970-2008 The Columbus Free Press Disclaimer |