 |
Thu Mar 18 2010
|
|
|
Columns
Norman Solomon
Aol Time Warner: calling the faithful to their knees
January 14, 2000
And so, early in the year 2000, it came to pass that visions of a seamless
media web enraptured the keepers of pecuniary faith as never before. A
grand new structure, AOL Time Warner, emerged while a few men proclaimed
themselves trustees of a holy endeavor. They told the people about a
wondrous New Media world to come.
Lo, they explained, changes of celestial magnitude were not far off. A
miraculous future, swiftly approaching, would bring cornucopias of
bandwidth and market share. A pair of prominent clerics named Steve Case
and Gerald Levin gained ascendancy. Under bright lights, how majestic they
looked!
And how they could preach! Announcing unification, they seemed to make the
media world stand still. Reporters and editors gasped. Some were fearful,
their smiles of fascination tight. Others bowed and scraped without
hesitation.
In keeping with the dominant creeds of the era, believers in the divine
right of capital asserted that separation of corporate church and state was
an anachronism. A torch had been passed to a new veneration. Media monarchs
would rule with unabashed fervor, while taking care to help regulate mere
governments.
The power of the new theocracy promised to be unparalleled. On Jan. 2,
2000 -- just one week before the portentous announcement -- the chief
prelate of Time Warner alluded to transcendent horizons. Global media "will
be and is fast becoming the predominant business of the 21st century,"
Levin said on CNN, "and we're in a new economic age, and what may happen,
assuming that's true, is it's more important than government. It's more
important than educational institutions and non-profits."
He went on: "So what's going to be necessary is that we're going to need
to have these corporations redefined as instruments of public service
because they have the resources, they have the reach, they have the skill
base -- and maybe there's a new generation coming up that wants to achieve
meaning in that context and have an impact, and that may be a more
efficient way to deal with society's problems than bureaucratic governments."
The next sentence from the monied prince underscored the sovereign right
of cash: "It's going to be forced anyhow because when you have a system
that is instantly available everywhere in the world immediately, then the
old-fashioned regulatory system has to give way."
To discuss an imposed progression of events as some kind of natural
occurrence was a convenient form of mysticism -- long popular among the
corporately pious, who were often eager to wear mantles of royalty and
divinity. Tacit beliefs deemed the accumulation of wealth to be redemptive.
Inside many temples, monetary standards gauged worth.
A little more than half a century earlier, Aldous Huxley had predicted:
"The most important Manhattan Projects of the future will be vast
government-sponsored enquiries into...the problem of making people love
their servitude." To a lot of ears, that sounded like quite an exaggeration.
"There is, of course, no reason why the new totalitarianisms should
resemble the old," Huxley foresaw. He observed that "in an age of advanced
technology, inefficiency is the sin against the Holy Ghost. A really
efficient totalitarian state would be one in which the all-powerful
executive of political bosses and their army of managers control a
population of slaves who do not have to be coerced, because they love their
servitude. To make them love it is the task assigned, in present-day
totalitarian states, to ministries of propaganda, newspaper editors and
schoolteachers. But their methods are still crude and unscientific." That
was in 1946.
In 2000, there wasn't much crude about the methods of Steve Case, Gerald
Levin and others at the top of large corporate denominations, heralding joy
to the world via a seamless web of media. Two days after disclosure of
plans for unification, Case assured a national PBS television audience:
"Nobody's going to control anything." Seated next to him, Levin declared:
"This company is going to operate in the public interest."
Such pledges, invariably uttered in benevolent tones, were the classic
vows of scamsters claiming to have the most significant gods on their side.
In this way a hallowed duo, Case and Levin, moved ahead to gain more
billions for themselves and maximum profits for some other incredibly
wealthy people. By happy coincidence, they insisted, the media course that
would make them richest was the same one that held the most fulfilling
promise for everyone on the planet.
A transcript with audio of Norman Solomon appearing on a panel on the
"NewsHour With Jim Lehrer," discussing the AOL - Time Warner merger, is
posted on the PBS website at:
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/business/jan-june00/aol_01-10.html
Norman Solomon's latest book The Habits of Highly Deceptive Media: Decoding Spin and Lies in Mainstream News has
just won the 1999 George Orwell Award for Distinguished Contribution to
Honesty and Clarity in Public Language, presented by the National Council
of Teachers of English.
Email this article to a friend
|
|
 | |
Click here to visit Harvey Wasserman's Solartopia.org.
 Don't forget to check out articles from 2008 and 2009 Norman Solomon
"And now, the P.U.-litzer Prizes for 2000" December 23, 2000
"Media crucial as Bush faces 'Legitimacy Gap'" December 17, 2000
"How to improve on the feats of network news" December 8, 2000
"A dire shortage of pre-inaugural schlock" November 30, 2000
"Finally: A Huge Media Spectacle That Really Matters?" November 23, 2000
"Public wiser than pundits in post-election uproar" November 16, 2000
"Arrogance of TV Networks: Compounding a national crisis" November 9, 2000
"New Democrats: Maybe the jig is up" November 2, 2000
"Resistance to a tightening grip of censorship" October 26, 2000
"The debates: Truth is stranger than science fiction" October 19, 2000
"Media spin remains in sync with Israeli occupation" October 13, 2000
"Our debts to new media technology" October 6, 2000
"Level the playing field: What a media concept!" September 29, 2000
"Dr. Laura gets a TV show-but at what cost?" September 7, 2000
"When watchdogs have a blind spot - for themselves" August 31, 2000
"Paying homage to the Two-Party Media System" August 24, 2000
"The Deception Convention: Don't stop winking about tomorrow" August 17, 2000
"Holy smoke and mirrors: the rise of centrist theocrats" August 10, 2000
"The Pleasantville party floats on a media cloud" August 2, 2000
"Convention hospitality and police brutality" July 24, 2000
"The easy media politics of optimism" July 19, 2000
"And now, an all-new episode of 'Media Jeopardy!'" July 13, 2000
"Nader raises hackles of media establishment" July 6, 2000
"George Orwell's unhappy birthday" June 29, 2000
"The Los Alamos story: spinning like crazy" June 22, 2000
"The case for corporate-given names" June 15, 2000
"Can 'E-government' bring us point-and-click democracy?" June 8, 2000
"Campaign forecast: A long hot summer of punditry" June 1, 2000
"U.S. news media: A security zone for Israel" May 25, 2000
"Virtual Commandments of the dot.com faith" May 18, 2000
"Overcoming the hazards of media monoculture" May 11, 2000
"Ad industry: Giving women special treatment " May 3, 2000
"Break up Microsoft? . . . Then how about the media 'Big Six?'" April 27, 2000
"When Corporate Media Cover 'Independent Media'" April 20, 2000
"Protests in Washington clash with media spin" April 13, 2000
"From the news media to Elian, with love" April 6, 2000
"Mickey Mouse network participates in abuse" March 30, 2000
"Broadcasters celebrate big gains from violence and greed" March 26, 2000
"A season of news coverage: No cure for political blues" March 25, 2000
"The power and limits of photojournalism" March 23, 2000
"The media’s lethal injection of numbing" March 16, 2000
"Self-censorship is shadowing the new media era" March 3, 2000
"Reporting on bloodshed, TV journalists play dumb" March 2, 2000
"Dr. Laura: Radio’s leading anti-gay zealot" February 24, 2000
"NPR floats an ombudsman, but problems run deep" February 17, 2000
"E-Vandalism intrudes on the power to be heard" February 10, 2000
"Fine journalism deserves a lot more attention" February 3, 2000
"Bill Bradley, news media and 'The Politics of Ambiguity'" January 27, 2000
"Aol Time Warner: calling the faithful to their knees" January 14, 2000
"What happened to the 'Information Superhighway'?" January 7, 2000
Read Articles by Year: 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000

All content © 1970-2010 The Columbus Free Press Disclaimer |