 |
Fri Nov 21 2008
|
|
|
Columns
Norman Solomon
A Unanimous Triumph for Masters of War
September 14, 2001
On Friday, the Senate voted 98-0 for a war resolution. It says:
"The president is authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force
against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned,
authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on
Sept. 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons, in order to
prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United
States by such nations, organizations or persons."
This resolution, written as a blank check, is payable with vast
quantities of human corpses.
* * * * *
The black-and-white TV footage is grainy and faded, but it still
jumps off the screen -- a portentous clash between a prominent reporter and
a maverick politician. On the CBS program "Face the Nation," journalist
Peter Lisagor argued with a senator who stood almost alone on Capitol Hill,
strongly opposing the war in Vietnam from the outset.
"Senator, the Constitution gives to the president of the United
States the sole responsibility for the conduct of foreign policy," Lisagor
said.
"Couldn't be more wrong," Wayne Morse broke in. "You couldn't make
a more unsound legal statement than the one you have just made. This is the
promulgation of an old fallacy that foreign policy belongs to the president
of the United States. That's nonsense."
Lisagor: "To whom does it belong then, senator?"
Morse: "It belongs to the American people.... And I am pleading
that the American people be given the facts about foreign policy."
Lisagor: "You know, senator, that the American people cannot
formulate and execute foreign policy."
Morse: "Why do you say that? ... I have complete faith in the
ability of the American people to follow the facts if you'll give them. And
my charge against my government is -- we're not giving the American people
the facts."
In early August 1964, Morse was one of only two senators to vote
against the Tonkin Gulf resolution, which served as a green light for the
Vietnam War. While reviled by much of the press in his home state of Oregon
as well as nationwide, he persisted with fierce oratory for peace. It would
have been much easier to acquiesce to the media's war fever. But Morse was
not the silent type, especially in matters of conscience.
On Feb. 27, 1968, I sat in a small room at the Capitol to watch a
hearing of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Six members of the panel
were seated around a long table. Most of all, I remember Morse's voice,
raspy and urgent.
"My views are no longer lonely," he noted at one point, adding:
"You have millions of people who are not going to support this tyranny that
American boys are being killed in South Vietnam to maintain in power."
Morse summed up his position on negotiations between the U.S.
government and its Vietnamese adversaries: "Who are we to say there have to
be two Vietnams? They are not going to do it and they shouldn't do it.
There isn't any reason in the world why the North Vietnamese and the
Vietcong should ever come to a negotiating table on the basis that there
must be two Vietnams."
Moments before the hearing adjourned, Morse said that he did not
"intend to put the blood of this war on my hands."
At the time, Oregon's senior senator was remarkable because he
challenged the morality -- not just the "winability" -- of the war. He
passionately asserted that the United States had no right to impose its
will on the world. In the process, he made enemies of many fellow
Democrats, including President Lyndon Johnson.
Like most heretics, Morse suffered consequences. After 24 years in
the Senate, he lost a race for re-election in November 1968. The winner was
a slick politician named Robert Packwood, who denounced Morse's antiwar
fervor.
In his lifetime, Morse became a media pariah. In the
quarter-century since his death, political reporters have rarely mentioned
his name.
"I don't know why we think, just because we're mighty, that we
have the right to try to substitute might for right," Morse said on
national television in 1964. "And that's the American policy in Southeast
Asia -- just as unsound when we do it as when Russia does it."
Three years later, he declared: "We're going to become guilty, in
my judgment, of being the greatest threat to the peace of the world. It's
an ugly reality, and we Americans don't like to face up to it. I hate to
think of the chapter of American history that's going to be written in the
future in connection with our outlawry in Southeast Asia."
Such heresy infuriated many powerful politicians -- and
journalists -- while Wayne Morse did all he could to block a war train
speeding to catastrophe.
* * * * *
Now, in the autumn of 2001, there's no one stepping forward from
the Senate to help block the war train. We'll need to do it ourselves.
Email this article to a friend
|
|
 | |
Don't forget to check out articles from 2007 and 2008 
Norman Solomon
"In the Media Mix, What Happens to Music? " December 28, 2001
"Bad News When Madmen Lead the Blind " December 20, 2001
"Announcing the P.U.-litzer Prizes for 2001 " December 13, 2001
"Noam Chomsky -- Saying What Media Don't Want Us to Hear " December 6, 2001
"Geographical Correctness Could Be A Jolt " November 30, 2001
"A Sweet Message for Americans -- 'We Are Family'" November 26, 2001
"Fear and Numbing in the TV Zone " November 17, 2001
"Bloomberg's Victory and the Triumph of Business " November 8, 2001
"The World Series in a Time of Crisis " November 1, 2001
"War Needs Good Public Relations" October 25, 2001
"The Televised Greatness of George W. Bush" October 18, 2001
"Killing Them Softly -- Starvation and Dollar Bills for Afghan Kids " October 12, 2001
"TV News: A Militarized Zone" October 8, 2001
"Spin Revolves Around the Word 'Terrorist'" October 4, 2001
"The 'Wimp' Factor -- Goading to Shed Blood " September 27, 2001
"Behind the Reassuring Words " September 25, 2001
"When Journalists Report for Duty" September 20, 2001
"A Unanimous Triumph for Masters of War" September 14, 2001
"Terrorism, Television and the Rage for Vengeance" September 13, 2001
"Overdue verdue: Media scrutiny of the 'White Bloc'" July 1, 2001
"Bad news bears change tone of media script" April 12, 2001
"U.S. - China Dispute: From Other Side of Media Window" April 5, 2001
"The non-issue of 'media finance reform'" March 29, 2001
"The Digital Promise of a Global Village" March 20, 2001
"Triumph of Will: When media might makes right" March 8, 2001
"Politics as performance art, journalism as drama reviews" March 1, 2001
"Obstinate memory and pursuit of the present" February 22, 2001
"Reagan, Clinton and the spectrum of mainstream punditry" February 15, 2001
"Reporting on the fight against AIDS in poor nations" February 8, 2001
"From the global south side of the media looking glass" February 1, 2001
"The narrow separation of press and state" January 24, 2001
"50 years later, the tragedy of nuclear tests in Nevada" January 21, 2001
"Ashcroft and racism: breaking the code" January 10, 2001
"Confirmation path greased for Ashcroft? Not so fast!" January 5, 2001
Read Articles by Year: 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000

All content © 1970-2008 The Columbus Free Press Disclaimer |