 |
Fri Nov 21 2008
|
|
|
Columns
Norman Solomon
Behind the Reassuring Words
September 25, 2001
The Bush administration has vowed that it will not aim the
Pentagon's firepower at civilian targets in Afghanistan. Such assurances
are supposed to make us think that innocent bystanders will be spared when
the missiles fly and the warheads explode. Don't believe it.
Back in early August 1945, President Truman had this to say: "The
world will note that the first atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, a
military base. That was because we wished in this first attack to avoid, in
so far as possible, the killing of civilians."
Actually, the U.S. government went out of its way to select
Japanese cities of sufficient size to showcase the extent of the A-bomb's
deadly power. In Hiroshima and Nagasaki, hundreds of thousands of civilians
died -- immediately or eventually -- as a result of the atomic bombings.
In the past several decades, presidents have routinely expressed
their reverence for civilian lives while trying to justify orders that
inevitably destroyed civilian lives. Denial is key to the success of
public-relations campaigns that always accompany war.
While top U.S. officials spoke of fervent desires to protect
civilians from harm in Southeast Asia, the Pentagon inflicted massive
carnage on the populations of Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia. Both Lyndon
Johnson and Richard Nixon tirelessly proclaimed their eagerness for "peace
with honor." Most of those who died were civilians.
When U.S. troops invaded Panama in December 1989, the USA's major
media and policymakers in Washington ignored the hundreds of civilians who
died in the assault. Scarcely more than a year later, during the Gulf War,
most of the people killed by Uncle Sam were civilians and frantically
retreating soldiers. Pentagon officials quietly estimated that 200,000
Iraqis had died in six weeks. During the past decade, damage to Iraq's
civilian infrastructure and ongoing sanctions have cost the lives of at
least several hundred thousand children.
In the spring of 1999, we were told, the U.S.-led bombing of
Yugoslavia aimed only at military targets. The explanations were often
Orwellian -- not just from the Clinton administration and NATO, but also
from news media.
Consider the opening words of the lead front-page article in the
New York Times one Sunday in April 1999: "NATO began its second month of
bombing against Yugoslavia today with new strikes against military targets
that disrupted civilian electrical and water supplies..." The concept was
remarkable: The bombing disrupted "civilian" electricity and water, yet the
targets were "military" -- a very convenient distinction for PR purposes,
but irrelevant to the civilians who perished due to destruction of basic
infrastructure.
Now, while people in Afghanistan fear missiles and bombs, their
lives are most threatened by a dire lack of food. The likelihood of a
large-scale assault has already forced aid organizations out of the country
-- "fearing both that they may be caught in the expected raids or that they
would be attacked as westerners after the NATO bombers have flown away,"
says Chris Buckley, the Christian Aid program officer for Afghanistan. He
adds that the nation "is in the grip of a three-year drought and on the
verge of mass starvation. According to the UN-run World Food Program, by
the end of the year 5.5 million people will be entirely dependent on food
aid to survive the winter. That's a quarter of the Afghan population."
In human terms, the emerging U.S. military scenarios are ghastly.
And -- with Washington already gaining Pakistan's agreement to cut off food
aid to Afghanistan -- they're also illegal. Part IV of the Geneva
Conventions clearly states that "starvation of civilians as a method of
warfare is prohibited." The same document forbids targeting "objects
indispensable to the survival of the civilian population."
No amount of vehement denials can change the reality that huge
numbers of civilians are now in the Pentagon's cross hairs.
_______________________________________________
Norman Solomon's latest book is "The Habits of Highly Deceptive Media."
Email this article to a friend
|
|
 | |
Don't forget to check out articles from 2007 and 2008 
Norman Solomon
"In the Media Mix, What Happens to Music? " December 28, 2001
"Bad News When Madmen Lead the Blind " December 20, 2001
"Announcing the P.U.-litzer Prizes for 2001 " December 13, 2001
"Noam Chomsky -- Saying What Media Don't Want Us to Hear " December 6, 2001
"Geographical Correctness Could Be A Jolt " November 30, 2001
"A Sweet Message for Americans -- 'We Are Family'" November 26, 2001
"Fear and Numbing in the TV Zone " November 17, 2001
"Bloomberg's Victory and the Triumph of Business " November 8, 2001
"The World Series in a Time of Crisis " November 1, 2001
"War Needs Good Public Relations" October 25, 2001
"The Televised Greatness of George W. Bush" October 18, 2001
"Killing Them Softly -- Starvation and Dollar Bills for Afghan Kids " October 12, 2001
"TV News: A Militarized Zone" October 8, 2001
"Spin Revolves Around the Word 'Terrorist'" October 4, 2001
"The 'Wimp' Factor -- Goading to Shed Blood " September 27, 2001
"Behind the Reassuring Words " September 25, 2001
"When Journalists Report for Duty" September 20, 2001
"A Unanimous Triumph for Masters of War" September 14, 2001
"Terrorism, Television and the Rage for Vengeance" September 13, 2001
"Overdue verdue: Media scrutiny of the 'White Bloc'" July 1, 2001
"Bad news bears change tone of media script" April 12, 2001
"U.S. - China Dispute: From Other Side of Media Window" April 5, 2001
"The non-issue of 'media finance reform'" March 29, 2001
"The Digital Promise of a Global Village" March 20, 2001
"Triumph of Will: When media might makes right" March 8, 2001
"Politics as performance art, journalism as drama reviews" March 1, 2001
"Obstinate memory and pursuit of the present" February 22, 2001
"Reagan, Clinton and the spectrum of mainstream punditry" February 15, 2001
"Reporting on the fight against AIDS in poor nations" February 8, 2001
"From the global south side of the media looking glass" February 1, 2001
"The narrow separation of press and state" January 24, 2001
"50 years later, the tragedy of nuclear tests in Nevada" January 21, 2001
"Ashcroft and racism: breaking the code" January 10, 2001
"Confirmation path greased for Ashcroft? Not so fast!" January 5, 2001
Read Articles by Year: 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000

All content © 1970-2008 The Columbus Free Press Disclaimer |