 |
Fri Nov 21 2008
|
|
|
Columns
Norman Solomon
A leathal way to 'dispatch' the news
April 11, 2003
In times of war, journalists can serve as vital witnesses for the
people of the world. So it's especially sinister when governments take
aim at reporters and photographers.
A few weeks ago, when I was talking with a CNN cameraman, he
recalled an overseas stint to cover events in the West Bank. Anger was
evident in his voice: "The Israelis were shooting at us."
When military forces are assaulting civilians, commanders often try
to prevent media from telling true stories with pictures and words.
Governments that maim and kill civilians are routinely eager to stop
journalists from getting too close to the action. Those who persist are
vulnerable to retribution.
For a long time now, the U.S. government has been hostile toward
the Al-Jazeera television network. Widely watched in the Arab world,
Al-Jazeera's coverage of the war on Iraq has been in sharp contrast to
the coverage on American television. As Time magazine observed: "On U.S.
TV it means press conferences with soldiers who have hand and foot
injuries and interviews with POWs' families, but little blood. On Arab
and Muslim TV it means dead bodies and mourning."
Back in 2001, with the United States at war in Afghanistan, the
Pentagon bombed Al-Jazeera's bureau in Kabul. This year, during the
lead-up to the war in Iraq, Al-Jazeera repeatedly informed the U.S.
military of the exact coordinates of the network's office in downtown
Baghdad.
On April 8, a U.S. missile hit that Al-Jazeera office, taking the
life of Tareq Ayub, a 34-year-old Jordanian journalist. A coincidence? A
mere accident? I don't think so.
The same day, a U.S. tank fired a shell at the Palestine Hotel,
where most foreign journalists have been based lately in Baghdad. The
assault killed Taras Protsyuk of the Reuters news agency and Jose Couso
of the Spanish network Telecinco.
Explanations from the Pentagon have not been credible. "U.S.
Central Command first said troops came under fire from the (hotel)
lobby, while the field commander said whatever fire had been headed
toward his troops was wiped out with a single tank round into the upper
floors of the hotel," the AFX news agency reported. "But after a
journalist questioned why the tank shot the upper floors when fire had
come from the lobby, Central Command issued a revised statement saying
there had been 'significant enemy fire.'"
However, the journalists who were eyewitnesses flatly contradicted
that claim, saying no weapons fire had emanated from the hotel. "There
was no shooting at all," said French TV cameraman Herve De Ploeg. "Then
I saw the turret turning in our direction and the carriage lifting. It
faced the target." He insisted: "It was not a case of instinctive
firing."
The U.S. government's response has been to scold journalists for
trying to do their jobs. "We continue to warn news organizations about
the dangers," said the Pentagon's Victoria Clarke, who added: "We've had
conversations over the last couple of days, news organizations eager to
get their people unilaterally into Baghdad. We are saying it is not a
safe place, you should not be there."
The key word in Clarke's statement was "unilaterally" -- as opposed
to "embedded" with U.S. troops. Decoding the Pentagon's message to
journalists isn't too difficult: If you don't play by our rules, you're
much more likely to find yourself on a stretcher -- or dead.
I certainly wouldn't argue with the father of the journalist killed
by the U.S. missile that hit the Al-Jazeera office in Baghdad. "My son
is a martyr who was killed as a result of America's so-called
civilization in an attack on press freedom," said Naeem Ayub. He added:
"They are attacking journalists to hide the truth."
Civil libertarians in the United States worry aloud that government
pressures and corporate dominance can have a "chilling effect" on
freedom of the press. We should not forget that it can also be chilling
for journalists to see their colleagues killed as part of a governmental
pattern.
The day after Tareq Ayub died, Al-Jazeera moved to evacuate its
employees. "I believe that none of them is safe anymore, whether in
Baghdad or the rest of Iraq," said editor-in-chief Ibrahim Hilal, "even
those who are with American troops."
No doubt the media spinners in Washington look forward to the
departure of Al-Jazeera's journalists from liberated Iraq.
_____________________________
Related link:
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/ED10Ak04.html
_____________________________
Norman Solomon is co-author of the new book "Target Iraq: What the News
Media Didn't Tell You." For an excerpt and other information, go to:
www.contextbooks.com/new.html#target
Email this article to a friend
|
|
 | |
Don't forget to check out articles from 2007 and 2008 
Norman Solomon
"The unpardonable Lenny Bruce" December 26, 2003
"Announcing the P.U.-litzer prizes for 2003" December 23, 2003
"Breakthrough and Peril for the Green Party" December 11, 2003
"Dean and the Corporate Media Machine" December 5, 2003
"Linking the Occupation of Iraq With the 'War on Terrorism'" November 21, 2003
"Media Clash in Brazil: A Distant Mirror " November 19, 2003
"The steady theft of our name" November 5, 2003
"Brand Loyalty and the Absence of Remorse" October 18, 2003
"Media Tips for the Next Recall " October 10, 2003
" Unmasking the Ugly 'Anti-American'" October 1, 2003
"'Wesley & Me': A Real-Life Docudrama" September 25, 2003
"The get-rich con: are media values better now?" September 18, 2003
"Triumph of the media mill" September 11, 2003
"The Political Capital of 9/11" September 8, 2003
"The quagmire of denouncing a "quagmire"" September 5, 2003
"The Ten Commandments -- are they fair and balanced?" August 29, 2003
"SPECIAL COLUMN: Dean Hopes and Green Dreams: The 2004 Presidential Race " August 25, 2003
"If Famous Journalists Became Honest Rappers" August 21, 2003
"News Flash: This is not a "Silly Season"" August 14, 2003
"Tilting Democrats in the presidential race" August 1, 2003
"The gang that couldn't talk straight" July 31, 2003
"War Boosters Unlikely to Voice Regret " July 17, 2003
"Visual images and how we see the world" June 30, 2003
"Tilting Democrats in the Presidential race" June 26, 2003
"The media politics of impeachment" June 20, 2003
"Trust, war and terrorism" June 15, 2003
"Britain -- not quite a parallel media universe" June 12, 2003
"The spamming of America: another brick in the wall" June 2, 2003
"Decoding the media fixation on terrorism" May 22, 2003
"Introspective media not in the cards" May 8, 2003
"A Different Approach for the 2004 Campaign " May 1, 2003
"Mark Twain Speaks to Us: 'I Am an Anti-Imperialist'" April 15, 2003
"A leathal way to 'dispatch' the news" April 11, 2003
"The thick fog of war on American television" April 3, 2003
"Media war: obsessed with tactics and technology" March 27, 2003
"Casualties of war -- first truth, then conscience" March 20, 2003
"The conventional media wisdom of obedience" March 13, 2003
"American media dodging U.N. surveillance story" March 6, 2003
"Followup needed after Newsweek story on Iraqi weapons" February 27, 2003
""Globalization" and its malcontents" February 20, 2003
"Playing the "Terrorism" Card" February 13, 2003
"Colin Powell is flawless -- inside a media bubble" February 7, 2003
"Decoding some top buzz words of 2002" January 26, 2003
"Memo: When war is a rush" January 21, 2003
Read Articles by Year: 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000

All content © 1970-2008 The Columbus Free Press Disclaimer |