The Free Press: Speaking Truth to Power Tue Dec 02 2008
Columns
Norman Solomon

Little Reporting on Paranoia in High Places
March 26, 2005

Journalists often refer to the Bush administration’s foreign policy as “unilateral” and “preemptive.” Liberal pundits like to complain that a “go-it-alone” approach has isolated the United States from former allies. But the standard American media lexicon has steered clear of a word that would be an apt description of the Bush world view.

Paranoid.

Early symptoms met with tremendous media applause in the immediate aftermath of 9/11. Skepticism from reporters and dissent from pundits were sparse while President Bush quickly declared that governments were either on the side of the USA or “the terrorists.” Since then, the paranoiac scope of the administration’s articulated outlook has broadened while media acceptance has normalized it -- to the point that a remarkable new document from the Pentagon is raising few media eyebrows.

Released on March 18 with a definitive title -- “The National Defense Strategy of the United States of America” -- the document spells out how the Bush administration sees the world. Consider this key statement: “Our strength as a nation state will continue to be challenged by those who employ a strategy of the weak using international fora, judicial processes, and terrorism.”

A high-ranking Pentagon official, Douglas Feith, offered this explanation to reporters: “There are various actors around the world that are looking to either attack or constrain the United States, and they are going to find creative ways of doing that, that are not the obvious conventional military attacks.” And he added: “We need to think broadly about diplomatic lines of attack, legal lines of attack, technological lines of attack, all kinds of asymmetric warfare that various actors can use to try to constrain, shape our behavior.”

Translation: They’re after us! And “they” are a varied assortment of individuals, groups and nations bent on harming us while impeding our efforts to do good and protect ourselves. (The Pentagon document says: “Our leading position in world affairs will continue to breed unease, a degree of resentment, and resistance.”) Some want to murder thousands or millions of American civilians, others want the United States to respect human rights and abide by the Geneva Conventions, still others vote the wrong way at the United Nations.

It’s all part of the same basic problem: Bad people are out to get us. Whether destroying the World Trade Center or filing suit at the International Criminal Court, evil ones and their abetters are engaged in sinister efforts. In the words of the Pentagon’s new document, they all “employ a strategy of the weak” against us -- the United States -- the epitome of the strong.

You might think that such an assertion from the top of the U.S. government -- appearing in a major statement of “defense strategy” -- would cause a stir if not an uproar. But it has been a fleeting minor story, bypassed by almost every big media outlet after a March 18 dispatch from the Associated Press flagged it with this provocative lead: “America’s strength is being challenged by ‘a strategy of the weak,’ a Pentagon document says, listing diplomatic and legal challenges in international forums in the same sentence with terrorism.”

One of the few major U.S. news outlets to report on the Pentagon’s “strategy of the weak” declaration, the Los Angeles Times, merely mentioned it in passing near the end of a back-page article. In contrast, outside the corporate media, Inter Press Service did its usual excellent job of shedding light on the latest twist of Washington’s foreign policy doctrines.

Overall, speaking for the U.S. government, the Bush administration has turned Uncle Sam into the world’s preeminent paranoid, conflating nearly all who oppose him. Actually, make that Him.

Like many who have succumbed to paranoia, the current incarnation of Uncle Sam is apt to invoke God while swearing eternal vengeance against any and every devilish foe. The satanic ones are sneaky all right. They may cloak themselves in all manner of legalistic garb, prattling about human rights and producing other pretexts for trying to stop us because we’re on the side of the angels. But they’re after us -- they hate us for our goodness and our purity, they cannot abide the light we bring unto the world. Verily, as the Lord was commenting just the other day, America’s geopolitical agenda is the essence of virtue, and all who wish to impede it must face our wrath...

Of course the United States continues to attract more “enemies,” real and imagined. Paranoids, including ones with a lot of blood on their hands, often vehemently and righteously deny that they’ve earned any valid hostility. On the contrary, all they deserve is gratitude and loyalty.

It remains to be seen when -- or whether -- mainstream American journalists will rouse themselves and begin to openly assess the paranoid aspects of the Bush administration’s foreign policy. If the new National Defense Strategy isn’t a sufficient wake-up call, what’s it going to take?

_________________________________________

Norman Solomon’s latest book, “War Made Easy: How Presidents and Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Death,” will be published in early summer. His columns and other writings can be found at: www.normansolomon.com


Email this article to a friend




1240 Bryden Road Columbus, Ohio 43209 Ph/Fx 614.253.2571 Email truth@freepress.org
  

Don't forget to check out articles from 2007 and 2008

Norman Solomon

"Journalists should expose secrets, not keep them"
  December 30, 2005

"Announcing the P.U.-litzer Prizes for 2005"
  December 22, 2005

"A new phase of bright spinning lies about Iraq"
  December 22, 2005

"Hidden in plane sight: U.S. media dodging air war in Iraq"
  December 17, 2005

"Colin Powell: Still craven after all these years"
  December 17, 2005

"The bogus blurring of terrorism and insurgency in Iraq"
  December 13, 2005

"At the gates of San Quentin"
  December 13, 2005

"Rumsfeld’s handshake deal with Saddam: history out of media bounds"
  December 10, 2005

"The Woodward scandal should not blow over"
  November 30, 2005

"Colin Powell: Still craven after all these years"
  November 30, 2005

"Thanksgiving and more taking"
  November 24, 2005

"Getting out of Iraq"
  November 22, 2005

"Axis of hardliners, from Tehran to Washington"
  November 5, 2005

"After the Libby indictment, the press is acquitting itself"
  October 31, 2005

"At the White House, the spin doctor is ill"
  October 30, 2005

"Iraq is not Vietnam. But..."
  October 25, 2005

"Media at a huge crossroads, 25 years after Reagan’s triumph"
  October 25, 2005

"Judith Miller, the Fourth Estate and the Warfare State"
  October 17, 2005

"The news media are knocking Bush -- and propping him up"
  October 16, 2005

"The occasional media ritual of lamenting the habitual"
  October 15, 2005

"What’s happening out of camera range?"
  October 14, 2005

"“The War on Terror” -- in Translation"
  October 10, 2005

"Torture and the “Controversial” Arc of Injustice"
  October 9, 2005

"Beyond the “Vietnam Syndrome”"
  September 21, 2005

"Dodging the Costs of the Warfare State"
  September 20, 2005

"Firing Michael Brown is not enough. How about Bush and Cheney?"
  September 6, 2005

"Bush’s implicit answer to Cindy Sheehan’s question"
  September 4, 2005

"Ending the Impunity of the Bush White House"
  September 2, 2005

"Triangulation for war"
  August 30, 2005

"Will News Media Help Bush Exploit the 9/11 Anniversary Again?"
  August 27, 2005

"Bush’s option to escalate the war in Iraq"
  August 24, 2005

"The Iraq War and MoveOn"
  August 22, 2005

"Blaming the antiwar messengers"
  August 17, 2005

"Someone Tell Frank Rich the War Is Not Over"
  August 16, 2005

"Rage against the killing of the light"
  August 11, 2005

"Big Star-Spangled Lies for War"
  August 8, 2005

"The Incredible Blight of TV Punditry"
  August 7, 2005

"Media flagstones along a path to war on Iran"
  August 4, 2005

"Thomas Friedman, Liberal Sadist?"
  July 29, 2005

"General Westmoreland’s death wish and the war in Iraq"
  July 21, 2005

"War and Venture Capitalism"
  July 18, 2005

"Terrorism, "the War on Terror" and the Message of Carnage"
  July 10, 2005

"Judith Miller -- Drum Major for War"
  July 7, 2005

"Mourn on the Fourth of July"
  July 1, 2005

"Letter From Tehran: In Washington's Cross-Hairs"
  June 16, 2005

"And Now, It's Time For ... "Media Jeopardy!""
  May 26, 2005

"News Media and “the Madness of Militarism”"
  May 24, 2005

"Political Bluster and the Filibuster"
  May 13, 2005

"Iraq: War, Aid and Public Relations"
  May 3, 2005

"Intervention spin cycle"
  April 26, 2005

"When Media Dogs Don’t Bark"
  April 18, 2005

"Why Iraq Withdrawal Makes Sense"
  April 17, 2005

"Beyond the Narrow Limits of News Coverage"
  April 7, 2005

"A Quarterly Report from Bush-Cheney Media Enterprises"
  April 1, 2005

"Little Reporting on Paranoia in High Places"
  March 26, 2005

"Why Iraq Withdrawal Makes Sense"
  March 21, 2005

"MoveOn.org: Making Peace With the War in Iraq"
  March 11, 2005

"When Junk Interrupts Junk"
  March 4, 2005

"Ex-Presidents as Pitchmen: Touting Good Deeds"
  February 25, 2005

"Great Media Critics: Intrepid for Journalism and Labor Rights"
  February 21, 2005

"Far from Media Spotlights, the Shadows of “Losers”"
  February 13, 2005

"What They Really Mean..."
  February 10, 2005

"Iraq Media Coverage: Too Much Stenography, Not Enough Curiosity"
  February 3, 2005

"A Shaky Media Taboo -- Withdrawal from Iraq"
  January 21, 2005

"Acts of God, Acts of Media"
  January 7, 2005




Read Articles by Year:
2007 2006 2005 2004
2003 2002 2001 2000




All content © 1970-2008
The Columbus Free Press
Disclaimer