Columns
Norman Solomon
Good news for Americans -- your wages are flat!
November 22, 2007
The economic coverage was fairly typical on a recent broadcast of the radio program “Day to Day,” airing nationwide from NPR News.
“There’s actually some good news out today about the American economy,” host Madeleine Brand announced. Then she introduced a reporter from the widely heard “Marketplace” show, Jill Barshay, who proceeded to offer the type of explanation that’s all too common in media accounts of economic trends.
“Well, just to be clear, we’re talking about worker productivity, which is how much stuff we make every hour,” Barshay replied. “And the Labor Department reported this morning that the hourly output per worker increased 4.9 percent in the third quarter. That’s the biggest jump in labor productivity we’ve seen since 2003. Another part of the report also says that labor costs fell a bit, so we’ve got employees being more productive and costing companies less. And this is important because it shows that the economy might be able to grow without generating inflation.”
Let’s unpack that narrative. From the outset, wages are described only as “labor costs” -- which fell, “so we’ve got employees being more productive and costing companies less.”
With that kind of setup near the top of a story, it’s just a hop, skip and a jump to depicting higher income for workers as a threat to the country’s economic well-being.
“Productivity is the economy’s best defense against inflation and recession,” the reporter went on, “and that’s because wages are the most important cost to companies, and most of our wages do go up every year, even if it’s just a little cost of living adjustment.”
And Barshay added: “So if we’re producing the same amount of stuff every year, then companies have a choice. They either can pass on these wage costs in the form of higher prices on the products we buy, or they take a hit to their profits. So if we’re producing more stuff, if we’re being more productive like we have in this past quarter, then we don’t have to worry so much about higher consumer prices or falling corporate profits.”
I don’t know about you, but I don’t worry much about “falling profits.” Few working people do. What we worry about is job insecurity, lousy working conditions, unpaid hours, evaporating pensions, and healthcare coverage that’s either woefully inadequate or nonexistent.
But during that Nov. 7 news segment on “Day to Day,” a key theme was the menace of “falling corporate profits.”
The idea that all of us should yearn for high corporate profits is convenient for corporate underwriters and advertisers. But key questions go unasked. Such as: Don’t outsized corporate profits actually represent ripoffs of workers and consumers alike -- in effect, underpricing our time and overpricing our purchases?
Such questions, however, are not often asked in mass media. Instead, we keep hearing and seeing coverage about the need to contain the “costs” of paying employees -- a frame of reference that portrays an upsurge in worker compensation as a threat to economic well-being rather than an enhancement of it.
As usual, the validity of the reportage hinges on where you sit. If you’re a business owner or major investor, then you may not want to see bigger checks going into pay envelopes. But relatively few of us are company owners or big investors. Most of us depend on income from our own labor.
An insidious aspect of such frequent stories, equating the health of “the economy” with the ability of corporations to hold down payroll “expenses,” is that they discount the importance of the most common human experiences. Routinely, in medialand, people who work for a living are consigned to the peripheral vision of news accounts, while economically powerful individuals and institutions keep occupying the center stage.
___________________________________
Norman Solomon’s latest book is “Made Love, Got War: Close Encounters with America’s Warfare State.” For information, go to: www.MadeLoveGotWar.com
Email this article to a friend
|
 |
Norman Solomon
"Channeling Suze Orman" December 28, 2007
"Announcing the P.U.-litzer Prizes for 2007" December 23, 2007
"The mad corporate world of Glenn Beck" December 20, 2007
"The USA's human rights daze" December 14, 2007
"The media and class warfare" November 22, 2007
"Good news for Americans -- your wages are flat!" November 22, 2007
"The pro-war undertow of the Blackwater scandal" October 31, 2007
"The United States of Violence" October 19, 2007
"How Sputnik contributed to the marriage of science and weaponry" October 8, 2007
"Sputnik, 50 years later: the launch of techno-power" October 5, 2007
"Political "science" and truth of consequences" October 1, 2007
"Here’s the smell of the blood still" September 12, 2007
"Six years of 9/11 as a license to kill" September 11, 2007
" Thomas Friedman: Hooked on war" September 6, 2007
"Let’s face it: the warfare state is part of us" August 23, 2007
"Let us now praise an infamous woman -- and our own possibilities" August 8, 2007
"Media Corrections We’d Like to See" August 5, 2007
"Media blitz for war: the big guns of august" August 2, 2007
"Media spin on Iraq: we're leaving (sort of)" July 26, 2007
"From the grave, a Senator exposes bloody hands on Capitol Hill" July 21, 2007
"A bloody media mirror" July 5, 2007
"War at the remote" June 20, 2007
"Deadly illusions, rest in peace" May 27, 2007
"On the media horizon: "We invest, you decide"" May 6, 2007
"Bowing down to our own violence" April 22, 2007
"Awful truth about Hillary, Barack, John... and Whitewash" April 12, 2007
"The Martin Luther King you don't see on TV" April 4, 2007
"While McCain walks in McNamara’s footsteps" April 2, 2007
"The pragmatism of prolonged war" March 13, 2007
"Making an example of Ehren Watada" February 7, 2007
"The Pentagon vs. press freedom" January 23, 2007
"The headless Horseman of the Apocalypse" January 10, 2007
Read Articles by Year: 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 |