Columns
Norman Solomon
The USA's human rights daze
December 14, 2007
The chances are slim that you saw much news coverage of Human Rights
Day when it blew past the media radar -- as usual -- on Dec. 10.
Human rights may be touted as a treasured principle in the United
States, but the assessed value in medialand is apt to fluctuate
widely on the basis of double standards and narrow definitions.
Every political system, no matter how repressive or democratic, is
able to amp up public outrage over real or imagined violations of
human rights. News media can easily fixate on stories of faraway
injustice and cruelty. But the lofty stances end up as posturing to
the extent that a single standard is not applied.
When U.S.-allied governments torture political prisoners, the
likelihood of U.S. media scrutiny is much lower than the probability
of media righteousness against governments reviled by official
Washington.
But what are "human rights" anyway? In the USA, we mostly think of
them as freedom to speak, assemble, worship and express opinions. Of
course those are crucial rights. Yet they hardly span the broad scope
that's spelled out in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
That document -- adopted by the General Assembly of the United
Nations on Dec. 10, 1948 -- affirms "human rights" in the ways that
U.S. media outlets commonly illuminate the meaning of the term. But
the Declaration of Human Rights also defines the rights of all human
beings to include "freedom from fear and want" -- and not only as
generalities.
For instance, the first clause of Article 23 states: "Everyone has
the right to work, to free choice of employment, to just and
favorable conditions of work and to protection against unemployment."
And: "Everyone, without any discrimination, has the right to equal
pay for equal work"; the right "to form and to join trade unions";
and, overall, "an existence worthy of human dignity, and
supplemented, if necessary, by other means of social protection."
Perhaps the farthest afield from the customary U.S. media parameters
is Article 25 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which
insists: "Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for
the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including
food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social
services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment,
sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood
in circumstances beyond his control."
Measured with such yardsticks for human rights, the United States
falls far short of many countries. If American news media did a
better job of reporting on human rights in all their dimensions, we'd
be less self-satisfied as a nation -- and more outraged about the
widespread violations of human rights that persist in our midst every
day.
The human consequences of those violations are incalculable, but
they're largely removed from the center stage of dramas that fill
news pages and newscasts. This downplaying of economic human rights
is not mere happenstance. The violations are systemic -- within a
system that thrives on extreme inequities, creating enormous profits
for corporations and enriching some individuals along the way.
Within the boundaries of dominant news media and mainline political
discourse, the "issue" of human rights is in a narrow box. It
severely limits the humanity of our social order.
___________________________________
Norman Solomon's latest book is "Made Love, Got War: Close Encounters with
America's Warfare State." For information, go to: www.normansolomon.com
Email this article to a friend
|
 |
Norman Solomon
"Channeling Suze Orman" December 28, 2007
"Announcing the P.U.-litzer Prizes for 2007" December 23, 2007
"The mad corporate world of Glenn Beck" December 20, 2007
"The USA's human rights daze" December 14, 2007
"The media and class warfare" November 22, 2007
"Good news for Americans -- your wages are flat!" November 22, 2007
"The pro-war undertow of the Blackwater scandal" October 31, 2007
"The United States of Violence" October 19, 2007
"How Sputnik contributed to the marriage of science and weaponry" October 8, 2007
"Sputnik, 50 years later: the launch of techno-power" October 5, 2007
"Political "science" and truth of consequences" October 1, 2007
"Here’s the smell of the blood still" September 12, 2007
"Six years of 9/11 as a license to kill" September 11, 2007
" Thomas Friedman: Hooked on war" September 6, 2007
"Let’s face it: the warfare state is part of us" August 23, 2007
"Let us now praise an infamous woman -- and our own possibilities" August 8, 2007
"Media Corrections We’d Like to See" August 5, 2007
"Media blitz for war: the big guns of august" August 2, 2007
"Media spin on Iraq: we're leaving (sort of)" July 26, 2007
"From the grave, a Senator exposes bloody hands on Capitol Hill" July 21, 2007
"A bloody media mirror" July 5, 2007
"War at the remote" June 20, 2007
"Deadly illusions, rest in peace" May 27, 2007
"On the media horizon: "We invest, you decide"" May 6, 2007
"Bowing down to our own violence" April 22, 2007
"Awful truth about Hillary, Barack, John... and Whitewash" April 12, 2007
"The Martin Luther King you don't see on TV" April 4, 2007
"While McCain walks in McNamara’s footsteps" April 2, 2007
"The pragmatism of prolonged war" March 13, 2007
"Making an example of Ehren Watada" February 7, 2007
"The Pentagon vs. press freedom" January 23, 2007
"The headless Horseman of the Apocalypse" January 10, 2007
Read Articles by Year: 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 |