 |
Thu Nov 20 2008
|
|
|
Departments War in Iraq
Agreeing with Bin Laden
by Paul Recher
May 13, 2004
Though I am utterly opposed to his methodology, I am in total support of Bin Laden’s three demands on the U$A.
One is to end the bombing of Iraq. For eleven years, Britain and the U$A, without UN mandate, have been bombing Iraq. This deliberate, continued bombing of water and sewerage infrastructure has resulted in the needless death of over 500,000 Iraqi children (UNICEF). In 1990, there were zero cases of cholera per 100,000. Today the figure is more than 1400 people getting cholera per 100,000 and that’s only the cholera.
Two is for the U$A to take a more even-handed approach in the Israeli / Palestinian crisis. A good starting point would be getting behind UN resolution 242 which Israel blatantly disregards. UN resolution 242 calls upon Israel to get their collective ass out of the occupied ‘terrortories’. Instead, Israel continues to usurp land from the Palestinians imprisoning them in their own homes.
If the U$A and her coalition of the willing, can invade Iraq for defying a UN resolution without UN support, then isn’t it logical, consistent and fair for a coalition of Russia, Libya, France to invade Israel, remove Sharon, and replace him with someone more willing?
Three is for the infidels to leave the Holy Land meaning get the U$A military out of Saudi Arabia. It is anathema to orthodox Moslems that infidels are on holy soil.
Bin laden is not pro-active. He is reactive. Based on his own statements that if the U$A adhered to the three reasonable demands above, the Al-Qaeda threat would go away. On 12/11/02 "The road to safety begins by ending the aggression. Reciprocal treatment is part of justice. The incidents that have taken place ... are only reactions and reciprocal actions.
The news media misrepresented the above. The AOL headline was "Bin Laden vows to attack." Not exactly a neutral, truthful interpretation of his words.
Bin Laden gets treated as if he is an unyielding recalcitrant. In fact, what he says has always been couched in conditional terminology. To whit, all the media outlets reported this Binny statement 12/10/02 "By God, the youths of God are preparing for you things that would fill your hearts with terror and target your economic lifeline, until you stop your oppression and aggression against Muslims."
They all omitted the last line: "So let America increase the pace of this conflict or decrease it, and we will respond in kind."
Bin Laden and his ilk are the natural outcome of decades of mishandled foreign policy. The sure path to reduce terrorism is to address the root causes and for the U$A to transform its’ use of power.
But what can we expect when the most powerful nation on earth is deliberately kept in a state of ignorance by a gang of oil billionaires and presided over by an inarticulate draft-dodger who stole the Presidency? How can this greedy clique ever provide the compassion, wisdom and maturity to lead a great people?
--
Dr. Recher writes a column for the The Northern Star, the publication in which this article was first printed.
Email this article to a friend
|
|
 | |
Don't forget to check out articles from 2007 and 2008War in Iraq
"Bush's Cheap Mercenaries" October 27, 2004 Larry S. Rolirad
"Iraqi children under occupation" May 30, 2004 Joanne Baker, Child Victims of War
"Agreeing with Bin Laden" May 13, 2004 Paul Recher
"A Sorry Bunch: No Apology Necessary--Off to the Hague! " May 11, 2004 Julia Nambalirwa-Lugudde and Daniel Patrick Welch
"Censorship Adds to Outrage Over Torture" May 11, 2004 Martin Fishgold and David Swanson
"Boykin needs to be relieved of command, hate at the core of prisoner abuse scandal " May 10, 2004 John Janney
"What do fellow Americans do when the war becomes personal" April 21, 2004 Dr. J. Alva Scruggs
"Ending The “War On Terror” Myth" April 15, 2004 Stephen Crockett
"Staying The Course In Iraq Is Wrong" April 12, 2004 Stephen Crockett and Al Lawrence
"U.S. actions do little to alleviate the plight of women in Iraq and Afghanistan" April 12, 2004 Lucinda Marshall
"Iraq! Stay, leave or could there be a third option? " April 8, 2004 Mohamed Elibiary
"War tax resisters balk at paying for American militarism" April 6, 2004 Mark Anderson
"Rice Never Spoke About Al-Qaeda, Osama Bin Laden Before 9/11, Investigation Shows " April 5, 2004 Jason Leopold
"CIA Intelligence Reports Seven Months Before 9/11 Said Iraq Posed No Threat To U.S., Containment Was Working " February 28, 2004 Jason Leopold
"The hypocracy of National Sanctity of Human Life Day, 2004 " February 18, 2004 Free Press Staff
"An open letter from Ramsey Clark to the U.N. and George W. Bush" February 16, 2004 Ramsey Clark
"O'Neill's Claims Against Bush Supported By 1998 'War' Letters to Clinton Signed By Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz " January 14, 2004 Jason Leopold
Related Journal articles:
"Letters the troops have sent me" January 8, 2004
Read Articles by Year: 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000

All content © 1970-2008 The Columbus Free Press Disclaimer |