The Free Press -- Independent News Media

Thu Nov 20 2008

Departments
War in Iraq

Iraq’s Election Will Not Guarantee Democracy
by Gene C. Gerard
February 5, 2005

The Bush administration was understandably happy with the Iraqi election. Despite the death of approximately 50 people, 57 percent of the population voted. President Bush declared that “The people of Iraq have spoken to the world, and the world is hearing the voice of freedom.” However, a quick glance at recent history easily dispels the myth that elections lead to democracy and freedom.

After three years of political disagreements between Muslim and socialist political parties in Algeria, both sides agreed to participate in free elections in 1991. The Islamic Salvation Front won the first round of parliamentary elections, garnering 59 percent of the vote. As the country prepared for a second round of elections, the High Council of State, which was backed by the socialist National Liberation Front, cancelled the elections and appointed socialist politician Mohammed Boudiaff as president. This sparked nine years of civil war in Algeria, resulting in the death of over 100,000 people.

Jonas Savimbi, guerilla leader of the National Union for the Total Independence of Angola, was prompted by the Reagan administration to discontinue fighting the government and agree to national elections in 1992. Although Savimbi was a folk hero to some, the country voted for the communist Popular Movement for the Liberation of Angola party by a 20 percent margin. Savimbi invalidated the elections, calling them fraudulent, despite the United Nations declaring the elections to be fair. Civil war erupted, partially sparked by the Angolan people who felt cheated when their votes were cast aside, which lasted until 2002.

Charles Taylor, the popular rebel leader of Liberia, agreed to discontinue his seven year war against dictator Samuel Doe and submit to national elections in 1997. Liberians went to the polls in record numbers, with 85 percent of the population voting. Taylor was elected president with 70 percent of the vote. But within two years Taylor became dictatorial himself, and guerilla movements attempted to overthrow his government. This plunged the country into a civil war that lasted until 2003, when Taylor was indicted for war crimes and fled the country.

Although the election of a national assembly to draft a constitution may lead to democracy in Iraq, it is equally possible that it may not. If the constitution is not ratified, it may well spark civil war. And the interim government has made it too easy to reject the constitution. Under the ratification rules, all that is required to defeat the constitution is for any three of Iraq’s 18 provinces to veto it by a two-thirds vote.

Early election results indicate that the United Iraqi Alliance, the Shiite coalition, has garnered the majority of the votes counted so far. As such, they will have considerable influence in drafting the constitution. Although the Alliance has publicly stated that they do not want a theocracy, their two largest constituents, the Dawa Party and the Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution of Iraq, are backed by Iran, and both have privately called for a religious commonwealth. Yet in a recent poll, 59 percent of Iraqis do not want a religious government. If the Alliance drafts a constitution that allows Shiite clerics to wield too much power, it will be rejected by secularists and Sunnis, and civil war might well be the outcome.

The Kurds turned out in large numbers as an affirmation of their separatist movement. In the Kurdish north, those who voted for the national assembly were also asked to vote on an unofficial referendum on the independence of Kurdistan. Estimates suggest that 90 percent of Kurds voted in favor of independence. This past February, various Kurdish organizations attempted to present the American administrator for Iraq, Paul Bremer, with a petition containing 1.7 million signatures in support of an official Kurdish vote on independence, but they were turned away.

However, it will not be so easy to continue to ignore the Kurds. The Kurdistan Regional Government has called for full control over exporting their region’s petroleum. But Iraq’s finance minister recently stated that he hopes a law will be passed to allow for foreign businesses to invest in Iraq’s national oil company, suggesting that this “ is very promising to the American investors and certainly to oil companies.” Unless the constitution supports Kurdish independence, it will almost certainly be rejected, given that the Kurds control four provinces.

Many in the minority Sunni population boycotted the election as a protest against American influence in Iraq. Some Sunni polling places reported that no one showed up to vote. Consequently, only a small portion of Sunnis will help write the constitution. And since it appears that the Shiite coalition will dominate the national assembly, the Sunnis are likely to feel increasingly alienated and disenfranchised.

The Association of Muslim Scholars, the highest Sunni authority in Iraq, has already declared the election to be invalid and that the constitution will not be legitimate. The association warned that if the next Iraqi government is given legitimacy, “... this will open the door wide for evil which the international community will bear its consequences.” In a recent poll, 53 percent of Sunni’s said that the insurgent’s attacks were a legitimate form of resistance. Unless the national assembly incorporates Sunni opinions into the constitution, their isolation will cause the insurgency to grow. And if they reject it, which they could do since they control three provinces, Iraq may find itself in a civil war.

The Iraqi people should be applauded for going to the polls. But the Bush administration should not construe voting as a guarantee of democracy. As is frequently the case, elections have a way of producing unintended and sometimes tragic consequences.

Email this article to a friend

Don't forget to check out articles from 2007 and 2008

War in Iraq

"White phosphorous: the U.S. used it; the U.S. says it's illegal"
December 28, 2005
David Swanson

"Behind the steel curtain: the real face of the occupation"
December 20, 2005
Sabah Ali

"Waiting is the hardest part"
December 20, 2005
Greg Rollins, CPT

"Scotland: stop the war!"
December 10, 2005
David Swanson

"Not even to save our lives"
December 9, 2005
Mike Ferner

"Inconvenient journalists"
December 1, 2005
Robert C. Koehler, Tribune Media Services

"How pre-war Iraq intel was cooked"
November 24, 2005
Jason Leopold

"Chalabi pushes Iran card in last ditch self-promotion offensive"
November 16, 2005
The Insitute for International Mediation and Conflict Resolution

"Staying a wrong course"
October 17, 2005
Stephen Crockett

"US war photos"
October 16, 2005
Richard S. Ehrlich

"Banging at the gates of empire -- Washington, DC; September 24-26"
October 6, 2005
Peter Chabarek

"What Else Shall We Do?"
October 2, 2005
Mike Ferner

"Will we use the power we have on September 24?"
September 21, 2005
Mike Ferner

"The war in Iraq is increasingly unpopular and must end -- An interview with Dennis Kucinich"
September 8, 2005
Kevin Zeese, DemocracyRising.US

"What eating Cindy Sheehan?"
September 8, 2005
Jason Leopold

"Waiting for the outside world"
September 4, 2005
Mike Ferner

"Families ask that fallen soldiers be honored Sunday by a tolling of bells"
August 27, 2005
Faithful America, National Council of Churches

"Making the Iraq War and Occupation Personal"
August 25, 2005
Ralph Nader

"President Bush Knows the True Reasons He Started A War in Iraq, But He's Not Going to Tell"
August 25, 2005
Jason Leopold

"Armstrong bikes with president over Sheehan grave"
August 25, 2005
Greg Palast

"Sheehan breakthroughs, unbridgeable divides, and taboos unbroken"
August 22, 2005
David Swanson

"The people must demand peace: An interview with Tom Hayden"
August 22, 2005
Kevin Zeese

"Will celebrity-addicted America miss the point? "
August 18, 2005
Mike Ferner

"Jefferson would have stood with Cindy Sheehan "
August 16, 2005
Thom Hartmann

"Why is violence escalating in Iraq?"
August 1, 2005
Eric Straatsma, Peace Think Tank

"How the United States Marked the 3rd Anniversary of the Downing Street Memo"
July 23, 2005
David Swanson, www.afterdowningstreet.org

"Someone Tell Bush That Iraq Wasn’t Responsible for 9/11 Before another War Breaks Out"
June 21, 2005
Jason Leopold

"More damning than Downing Street"
June 21, 2005
Paul Rogat Loeb

"Messengers of Truth: Untangling a Knot of Lies"
June 18, 2005
Kevin Zeese

"How Much Proof Needed Before the Truth Comes Out? "
June 17, 2005
Kevin Zeese

"Silent Death in Iraq "
June 13, 2005
Ghazwan Al-Mukhtar

"Media Black Out Downing Street Minutes"
June 8, 2005
David Swanson, www.afterdowningstreet.org

"Getting Out of Iraq Will Be Tougher than Getting Out of Vietnam"
May 3, 2005
Kevin Zeese and Linda Schade

"No Troops, No Wars"
March 24, 2005
Yoshie Furuhashi

"Iraq’s Election Will Not Guarantee Democracy"
February 5, 2005
Gene C. Gerard

"The U.S. Supreme Court is AWOL on Iraq"
January 29, 2005
Gene C. Gerard

Read Articles by Year:
2007 2006 2005 2004
2003 2002 2001 2000