 |
Sat Jul 04 2009
|
|
|
Departments War in Iraq
White phosphorous: the U.S. used it; the U.S. says it's illegal
by David Swanson
December 28, 2005
The U.S. military used white phosphorous as a weapon in Fallujah, and the U.S. military says such use is illegal. That's one heck of a fog fact (Larry Beinhart's term for a fact that is neither secret nor known). This fact has appeared in an article in the Guardian (UK) and been circulated on the internet, but has just not interested the corporate media in the United States.
It interests Congressman John Conyers, however. Last week, Conyers released a 273-page report titled "The Constitution in Crisis; The Downing Street Minutes and Deception, Manipulation, Torture, Retribution, and Coverups in the Iraq War." This 273-page report covers many war-related crimes, including the use of white phosphorous. http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/?q=node/5769
On page 165, following discussion of other crimes against humanity, the report states: "Finally, there is evidence that the U.S. Military used an incendiary weapon in combat known as White Phosphorus, even though the U.S. Battle Book states, '[i]t is against the Law of Land Warfare to employ WP against personnel targets,' and which would be in contravention of the Geneva and Hague Conventions and the War Crimes Act."
That's an impressive criminal feat, violating multiple U.S. laws and international laws at one shot. But it may be a greater feat of hypocrisy and irony. After all, this war was supposedly launched in order to prevent the use of so-called weapons of mass destruction. While that lie has been exposed, we now know that WMDs have been wantonly employed in the course of this war by the so-called liberators. That fact is not yet widely known within the United States.
The Battle Book is published by the U.S. Command and General Staff College at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, and does indeed contain this sentence: "It is against the law of land warfare to employ WP against personnel targets." http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/army/docs/st100-3/c5/5sect3.htm
As George Monbiot makes clear in the Guardian, a chemical weapon is illegal, according to the Chemical Weapons Convention, regardless of whether the people targeted with it are civilians.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Columnists/Column/0,5673,1647998,00.html
"The Pentagon argues that white phosphorus burns people," Monbiot wrote, "rather than poisoning them, and is therefore covered only by the protocol on incendiary weapons, which the U.S. has not signed. But white phosphorus is both incendiary and toxic. The gas it produces attacks the mucous membranes, the eyes and the lungs. As Peter Kaiser of the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons told the BBC, 'If ... the toxic properties of white phosphorus, the caustic properties, are specifically intended to be used as a weapon, that of course is prohibited, because ... any chemicals used against humans or animals that cause harm or death through the toxic properties of the chemical are considered chemical weapons.'"
Blogger Gabriele Zamparini found a declassified document from the U.S. Department of Defense, dated April 1991, and titled "Possible use of phosphorous chemical," which makes clear that the U.S. military understands white phosphorous to be a chemical weapon. "During the brutal crackdown that followed the Kurdish uprising," it alleges, "Iraqi forces loyal to President Saddam (Hussein) may have possibly used white phosphorous (WP) chemical weapons against Kurdish rebels and the populace in Erbil ... and Dohuk provinces, Iraq. The WP chemical was delivered by artillery rounds and helicopter gunships. ... These reports of possible WP chemical weapon attacks spread quickly ... hundreds of thousands of Kurds fled from these two areas." http://www.gulflink.osd.mil/declassdocs/dia/19950901/950901_22431050_91r.html
Conyers' report, on page 102, cites evidence that the United States used white phosphorous in Fallujah:
"Recent reports coming out of Iraq verify the use of a weapon called white phosphorus (WP) in combat. An Italian state broadcaster, RAI, recently reported that American forces used WP in Fallujah last year against insurgents. According to a former American soldier who fought in Fallujah, 'I heard the order to pay attention because they were going to use white phosphorus on Fallujah. In military jargon it's known as Willy Pete. . . . Phosphorus burns bodies, in fact it melts the flesh all the way down to the bone . . . I saw the burned bodies of women and children. Phosphorus explodes and forms a cloud. Anyone within a radius of 150 metres is done for.'"
The RAI story reached British readers and perusers of the internet via a November 8th article in the Independent by Peter Popham titled "US Forces Used Chemical Weapons During Assault on City of Fallujah."
It remains unclear when that information will reach consumers of U.S. television news.
Email this article to a friend
|
|
 | |
Don't forget to check out articles from 2008 and 2009War in Iraq
"White phosphorous: the U.S. used it; the U.S. says it's illegal" December 28, 2005 David Swanson
"Behind the steel curtain: the real face of the occupation" December 20, 2005 Sabah Ali
"Waiting is the hardest part" December 20, 2005 Greg Rollins, CPT
"Scotland: stop the war!" December 10, 2005 David Swanson
"Not even to save our lives" December 9, 2005 Mike Ferner
"Inconvenient journalists" December 1, 2005 Robert C. Koehler, Tribune Media Services
"How pre-war Iraq intel was cooked" November 24, 2005 Jason Leopold
"Chalabi pushes Iran card in last ditch self-promotion offensive" November 16, 2005 The Insitute for International Mediation and Conflict Resolution
"Staying a wrong course" October 17, 2005 Stephen Crockett
"US war photos" October 16, 2005 Richard S. Ehrlich
"Banging at the gates of empire -- Washington, DC; September 24-26" October 6, 2005 Peter Chabarek
"What Else Shall We Do?" October 2, 2005 Mike Ferner
"Will we use the power we have on September 24?" September 21, 2005 Mike Ferner
"The war in Iraq is increasingly unpopular and must end -- An interview with Dennis Kucinich" September 8, 2005 Kevin Zeese, DemocracyRising.US
"What eating Cindy Sheehan?" September 8, 2005 Jason Leopold
"Waiting for the outside world" September 4, 2005 Mike Ferner
"Families ask that fallen soldiers be honored Sunday by a tolling of bells" August 27, 2005 Faithful America, National Council of Churches
"Making the Iraq War and Occupation Personal" August 25, 2005 Ralph Nader
"President Bush Knows the True Reasons He Started A War in Iraq, But He's Not Going to Tell" August 25, 2005 Jason Leopold
"Armstrong bikes with president over Sheehan grave" August 25, 2005 Greg Palast
"Sheehan breakthroughs, unbridgeable divides, and taboos unbroken" August 22, 2005 David Swanson
"The people must demand peace: An interview with Tom Hayden" August 22, 2005 Kevin Zeese
"Will celebrity-addicted America miss the point? " August 18, 2005 Mike Ferner
"Jefferson would have stood with Cindy Sheehan " August 16, 2005 Thom Hartmann
"Why is violence escalating in Iraq?" August 1, 2005 Eric Straatsma, Peace Think Tank
"How the United States Marked the 3rd Anniversary of the Downing Street Memo" July 23, 2005 David Swanson, www.afterdowningstreet.org
"Someone Tell Bush That Iraq Wasn’t Responsible for 9/11 Before another War Breaks Out" June 21, 2005 Jason Leopold
"More damning than Downing Street" June 21, 2005 Paul Rogat Loeb
"Messengers of Truth: Untangling a Knot of Lies" June 18, 2005 Kevin Zeese
"How Much Proof Needed Before the Truth Comes Out? " June 17, 2005 Kevin Zeese
"Silent Death in Iraq " June 13, 2005 Ghazwan Al-Mukhtar
"Media Black Out Downing Street Minutes" June 8, 2005 David Swanson, www.afterdowningstreet.org
"Getting Out of Iraq Will Be Tougher than Getting Out of Vietnam" May 3, 2005 Kevin Zeese and Linda Schade
"No Troops, No Wars" March 24, 2005 Yoshie Furuhashi
"Iraq’s Election Will Not Guarantee Democracy" February 5, 2005 Gene C. Gerard
"The U.S. Supreme Court is AWOL on Iraq" January 29, 2005 Gene C. Gerard
Read Articles by Year: 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000

All content © 1970-2009 The Columbus Free Press Disclaimer |