Departments
Columbus City officials hypocritical about public access TV
by Joe Sommer
June 11, 2011
Columbus city officials ended public access TV about 10 years ago after it had existed for decades in Central Ohio. The reason given was lack of funds. In subsequent years, city officials gave the same reason in response to suggestions to restore public-access TV.
But the financial situation has changed. At the urging of city officials, Columbus voters passed a substantial increase in the city income tax in 2009, resulting in the city having millions of dollars of surplus funds. Nevertheless, city officials are still refusing to restore public access TV.
The officials, including Democratic mayor Michael Coleman and an all-Democratic city council, now say that because of the Internet, YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter, citizens can communicate by those means and don’t need TV to communicate to the public. Volumes could be written about problems with their position.
For one thing, many historians and legal scholars have written about the Founding Fathers’ support for an open marketplace of ideas, the Founders’ belief that all persons should be able to express views in that marketplace regardless of economic status, and the importance of such a forum for advancing knowledge and improving government.
And as Al Gore did in his 2007 book The Assault on Reason, one could write about TV being by far the most influential communications medium in society, about the dominance of that medium by big-money interests, about the result that societal decisions are often based on power and influence instead of reason, and about the need to restore reason to the decision-making processes by allowing the views of average citizens to be heard on TV.
Likewise, other national Democratic leaders have spoken about television’s dominance by corporate interests and the need to open up the medium to a wider variety of voices. Those leaders include John Kerry, Howard Dean, and Dennis Kucinich. Kerry said diversity of media content is “critical to who we are as a free people. It’s critical to our democracy.”
One could additionally write about the Democratic Party’s history of being on the side of average persons instead of large corporate interests, and how public access TV gives average persons a chance to balance the views expressed by corporate interests on commercial TV. Because of that history, at least some supporters of Michael Coleman’s 1999 mayoral campaign never dreamed he would end public access TV, and he expressed no such intent as a candidate.
One could also point out, as was done in a YouTube video made in response to the threatened loss of public access TV in northern California, that public access TV is an excellent means for local groups to economically get their messages to the public, for enabling those groups to avoid having their messages distorted by the corporate media’s spin, for providing communications outlets for the views of minority groups in a diverse community, for ensuring that the real issues affecting real people are presented on TV, for enabling important health messages to get to the public, for providing local perspectives on national stories, and for promoting civil rights and social justice.
Moreover, one could write about the high percentage of people who have no Internet access, about that percentage being even higher for the elderly and the poor, and about television being the best method for reaching such people.
The biggest problem with the city’s position, however, is shown by the city’s continued funding and operation of the government channel, on which the mayor, city council, and other city officials repeatedly appear. If city officials really believe that the Internet is more effective than TV in reaching people, they should close down the government channel, use the money saved for street and safety improvements, and rely solely on the Internet to present their messages.
Similarly, during political campaigns, they should not buy political ads for TV but instead transmit their messages to the public through the Internet.
In fact, city officials could urge corporations to save billions of dollars in TV advertising costs by using only the Internet to reach people, so that the savings could be passed on to consumers. City officials could teach corporate advertising executives that the Internet is a far better means of getting messages to a mass audience.
But city officials aren’t doing any of those things. As long as they continue using TV to communicate to the public, they do not appear credible when they say citizens and community groups do not need TV for communicating to the public, and that the Internet is a superior means of doing so.
The actions of city officials speak louder than their words. Instead of promoting an open marketplace of ideas on the most influential communications medium, they are restricting that marketplace by allowing their views and the views of corporate interests to be heard, and excluding the voices of other citizens who might have different views.
It would be nice to hear an explanation from city officials as to why they believe they need to use TV to get their messages to the public, but claim to believe that average citizens do not need public access TV in order to accomplish the same purpose. So far they have been silent about this inconsistency.
It would be even nicer, though, to hear city officials get on the side of the Founding Fathers, the Democratic Party, and the public interest by restoring public access TV in Columbus.
YouTube video
|
 |
Recent Ohio Articles
Video by Occupy the Oval November 20, 2011 OSU students
Building on Defeating Issue 2 November 10, 2011 Robert A. Letcher, PhD
Columbus Coalition for Responsive Government to file initiative petition to revise Columbus City Charter November 7, 2011 Jonathan Beard
Hangin' with Glenn Beck so you don't have to: More Ohio Right to Life escapades November 5, 2011 Marley greiner
Study touts Social Security successes October 29, 2011 Bruce Bostick
Animal killing in Ohio highights need for regulations! October 25, 2011 Bruce Bostick
Created Equal: Condom course is an outrage to Ohio taxpayers! October 22, 2011 Marley Greiner
Occupy Columbus Update October 19, 2011 Connie Everett
Draconian Issue 3 would harm every Ohioan because of its intended and unintended consequences October 11, 2011 Albert A. Gabel
The death of Jerry Doyle October 10, 2011 Bob Fitrakis
Consider Columbus Occupied October 10, 2011 Occupycolumbus,org
Concerned citizens and faculty ask state to investigate mismanagement of Wilberforce University October 5, 2011 Tom Over
Ohioans say no to voter suppression October 5, 2011 Bruce Bostick
Ohio State University becoming less public? August 25, 2011 Tom Over
Trumka helps launch Ohio repeal campaign July 22, 2011 Bruce Bostick
Just ban them! (at least in Columbus) July 21, 2011 Connie Everett
AFL-CIO leaders Trumpka, Burga to kick off campaign to win poll fight on SB 5 July 18, 2011 Bruce Bostick
Indie journalists arrested in Greenfield last year return for accountability: Felony wiretapping among charges levied July 12, 2011 Ademo Freeman
Letter to the Editor - Heartbeat bill must not be passed July 1, 2011 Shira Nahari
MILLION OHIOANS SAY NO TO ANTI-LABOR BILL! June 30, 2011 Bruce Bostick
Push for a million Ohioans against SB5 June 25, 2011 Bruce Bostick (USW/SOAR)
Whirlpool steals workers' guaranteed health care June 19, 2011 Bruce Bostick (USW/SOAR)
Tax breaks for ‘Big Shots’ will cost middle class Ohioans, says lawmaker: State Rep. Sykes requests cost-impact analysis of Kasich’s new tax give-away June 19, 2011 Rep. Vernon Sykes office
Columbus City officials hypocritical about public access TV June 11, 2011 Joe Sommer
The Ohio Estate Tax should not be repealed June 2, 2011 Albert A. Gabel
Correction to the lead Columbus Dispatch editorial Sunday May 15, 2011 May 10, 2011 Albert A. Gabel, Professor Emeritus, Ohio State University
May 5 Statehouse rally stands up to Kasich's budget May 9, 2011 Bob Studzinski
Summary of Governor Kasich’s damaging efforts May 6, 2011 Albert A. Gabel, Professor Emeritus, Ohio State University
SB5 Petition Events Saturday April 23 April 22, 2011
Women in Central Ohio who had a Gynecologic biopsy at OSUMC need to send their biopsies to an outside Gyn Pathology expert April 18, 2011 Sally A
Demand that Ohio investigate torture allegations April 17, 2011 Free Press staff
Central Ohio fights back against Senate Bill 5 April 13, 2011 Bob Studzinski (photos)
Ohio GOP sends a stealth death notice to public college teachers unions April 2, 2011 Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman
Ohio Fight Back Drive announces at Town Hall meeting April 1, 2011 Bruce Bostick
Republicans pass anti-worker bill: Labor coalition build fight for justice! March 30, 2011 Bruce Bostick (USW/SOAR)
Photos from SB5 protest at Kasich's house in Westervile March 16, 2011 Free Press staff
Workers present their “State of the State” at huge protest March 13, 2011 Bruce Bostick
Corporate union busters draw first blood in Ohio March 3, 2011 Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman
Huge labor rally at the Ohio Statehouse March 2, 2011 Democracy Now
Rev. Jesse Jackson in Columbus March 2, 2011 Jack Burgess
Little Egypt at the Statehouse February 20, 2011 Jack Burgess
Ohio workers flood capital--Demand defeat of anti-labor bill! February 20, 2011 Bruce Bostick
Will Ohio's Auditor David Yost uncover the No Child Left Behind scam? January 30, 2011 Bob Fitrakis
Kasich, Kasich, you can’t hide – we know you’re with the rich inside January 11, 2011 Bob Fitrakis
On the OSU medical clinic article January 4, 2011 Margaret Nuovo
Ohio State's medical industrial complex under fire for unnecessary surgeries January 3, 2011 Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman
Read Ohio Articles by Year: 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 |