Departments
Ohio's Diebold Debacle: New machines call election results into question
by Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman
November 24, 2005
Massive Election Day irregularities are emerging in reports from all over Ohio after the introduction of Diebold's electronic voting in nearly half of the Buckeye State’s counties. A recently released report by the non-partisan General Accountability Office warned of such problems with electronic voting machines.
E-voting machine disasters
Prior to the 2005 election, electronic voting machines from Diebold and other Republican voting machine manufacturers were newly installed in 41 of Ohio’s 88 counties. The Dayton Daily News reported that in Montgomery County, for example, “Some machines began registering votes for the wrong item when voters touched the screen correctly. Those machines had lost their calibration during shipping or installation and had to be recalibrated. . . .”
Steve Harsman, the Director of the Montgomery County Board of Elections
(BOE), told the Daily News that the recalibration could be done on
site, but poll workers had never performed the task before.
The city of Carlisle, Ohio announced on November 22 that it is
contesting the results of the November 8 general election as a result
of Montgomery County vote counting problems. Carlisle Mayor Jerry
Ellender told the Middletown Journal that the count on the city’s
continuing $3.8 million replacement fire levy is invalid “since they
are not sure if Carlisle voters received the right ballots on the new
electronic voting machines.”
Harsman, according to the Journal, said, “poll workers incorrectly
encoded voter cards that are used to bring up the ballots on the
electronic machines in precincts in Germantown and Carlisle.”
At least 225 votes were registered for the fire levy in precincts with
only 148 registered voters, according to the Journal. In addition, 187
voting machine memory cards were lost for most of election night in
Montgomery County, according to the Dayton Daily News.
In Lucas County, election results appeared more than 13 hours after the
close of polls. The Toledo Blade cited “‘frightened’ poll workers,”
intimidated by the new “touch-screen voting machines.”
The Blade found that despite an $87,568 federal grant to the Lucas
County Board of Elections for “voter education and poll worker training
. . .” only $1,718.65 was spent from the grant.
The Blade also reported that ten days after the 2005 election, “Fourteen
touch-screen voting machines have sat unattended in the central hallway
at the University of Toledo Scott Park Campus.” The GAO report warned that
touch-screen machines are easily hacked and should be kept secure at
all times.
In Miami County, the Board of Elections fired the Deputy Director,
Diane Miley, following a 20-minute closed-door session reviewing the
November 8, 2005 general election.
The Free Press had reported that in the 2004 presidential election, Miami County was cited in the seminal Moss v. Bush election challenge case. The county was specifically cited for an early morning influx of 19,000 additional votes, mostly for Bush, after 100% of the vote had been reported.
The AP reported additional irregularities in the 2005 election in Ohio. In Wood
County, election results were not posted until 6:23 a.m. after poll workers at four polling places accidentally selected the wrong option on voting machines preventing the machine
memory cards from being automatically uploaded, according to the Board
of Elections Deputy Director Debbie Hazard.
In five counties – Brown, Crawford, Jackson, Jefferson and Marion –
using Diebold machines, there were problems with the counting of
absentee ballots as a result of “the width of the ballot,” the AP
reported.
In Scioto County, the vote count was not finished until 4:30 a.m.. Board
of Elections Director Steve Mowery informed the Portsmouth Daily Times
that, as a result of machines undergoing insufficient testing and
absentee problems, things went “poorly.”
Many counties used “roving employees” assigned to pick up memory cards
from voting machines. In Lucas County, these “rovers” traveled “to
multiple locations before delivering the cards to the election office
at Governmental Center.” The polls closed at 7:30 p.m. but, “The final
memory cards were delivered to the Board of Elections office just
before midnight,” according to WTOL Channel 11 News, Toledo.
Toledo’s WTOL Channel 11 News posed the simple question: “Did the delay in returning memory cards to the election office open the door to possible vote fraud?”
Amidst these massive glitches, Ohio Secretary of State J. Kenneth
Blackwell, who personally negotiated the deal for the Diebold machines
that he called the “best in the nation,” insisted through his
spokesperson Carlo LaParo that “The new touch-screen systems went
well.”
Odd results for election reform initiatives
The Reform Ohio Now (RON) campaign saw polls throughout the state showing two of its four election reform to be passing easily. Both the Columbus Dispatch and University of Akron Bliss Institute polls predicted victories for Issue 2 and Issue 3, only to see them go down to sudden and statistically unexplainable defeat. Issue 2 allowed for early voting in Ohio and Issue 3 reduced the amount of money an individual can give a candidate from $10,000 to $2,000. Both were predicted to pass with 59% and 61% of the vote, respectively.
The Bliss Institute of Applied Politics’ survey was completed on October 20 at the University of Akron Survey Research Center, and found that Issue 2 seemed likely to win approval with more than three-fifths of likely voters.
The Dispatch mail-in poll was completed on Thursday Nov. 3, just prior to Election Day. The Dispatch poll is so accurate, that at least two academic studies have been published about it in the Public Opinion Quarterly (POQ). The first paper documents that the Dispatch poll between 1980-1984 was far more accurate than telephone polling. The study showed the Dispatch error rate at only 1.6 percentage points versus phone error rates of 5%. A companion study published in POQ in 2000 dealt specifically with the question of statewide referenda. A quote from the study: "The average error for the Dispatch forecast of these referenda was 5.4 percentage points, compared to 7.2 percentage points for the telephone surveys."
The academic study concluded that the Dispatch's mail survey outperformed telephone surveys for both referenda and candidate's races.
The fact that the Dispatch was nearly 30 points off in predicting the "YES" vote on Issue 3 should raise concerns.
Dispatch Associate Publisher Mike Curtin shrugged off the worst polling
performance since the infamous Literary Digest predicted that Alf
Landon would beat FDR in 1936. In an email obtained by the Free Press,
Curtin told California voting rights activist Sheri Myers, “There is no
evidence of any irregularities in Ohio’s 2005 voting results.” Curtin,
according to election attorney Cliff Arnebeck, had also dismissed anyone who
raises issues about Ohio’s 2004 presidential election results as
“conspiracy theorists.”
Curtin co-authored the scholarly papers on the Dispatch’s legendary
polling accuracy. Editorially, the Dispatch has not endorsed a
Democratic presidential candidate since Woodrow Wilson in 1916.
Curtin pleaded with the voting rights activists, “Please don’t buy into the conspiracy theories without any shred of evidence.” Curtin did not deal with the specifics about how the polling, which he was so proud of, was up to 40 points off on certain issues for the first time ever.
In another email explaining the unprecedented Dispatch polling debacle,
Dispatch Editor Darrel Rowland told a Tribune Media Services columnist
that, “I also can’t imagine voting technology is to blame, when both
Democrats and Republicans are involved in every crucial step of the
way.”
Under oath testimony at public hearings sponsored by the Free Press after the 2004 presidential election revealed that election workers admit that they have little or no knowledge of how e-voting technology works and are totally reliant on private vendors for vote counting inside the “black box.” Ohio’s other major newspapers routinely suggest what Rowland “can’t imagine.”
Rowland did note that despite the Dispatch’s recent embracing of its
unprecedented incompetence at polling that, “Over the years we have
found that the people who return our mail poll are likely voters – the
holy grail in political polls. Our track record in gauging public
opinion in this state regarded as a national political bellwether is
unparalleled.
Don McTigue, the attorney for RON, told the Free Press that Blackwell had issued a ruling barring RON volunteers from the county vote counting rooms on election eve. McTigue and the RON volunteers had filled out a request form to view the counting eleven days prior to Election Day, but Blackwell had added a new form to verify which group was representing the issues. This new form was not filled out, McTigue admits.
Matt Damschroder, the Franklin County Board of Elections Director, allowed the RON observers in anyway, despite their being barred from the vote counting rooms in other counties.
This is the second straight election in which the polling organizations were spectacularly wrong in Ohio. In the 2004 election, the media consortium exit polls, as well as the Harris and Zogby polls, all declared Kerry the winner on Election Day.
Democracy in jeopardy
One of the first times electronic voting machines were used, in the 1988 New Hampshire presidential primary, former CIA director George Herbert Walker Bush pulled off a stunning and unpredicted upset. The last poll before that primary showed Senator Bob Dole winning with 8 percentage points. Bush won by 9 points, a startling 17-point shift. Bush’s e-voting victory allowed him to claim the White House and paved the way for his son to become the United States’ chief executive.
Diebold electronic voting machines use non-transparent, proprietary software to count the votes. Diebold’s CEO Wally O’Dell is one of President Bush’s major donors and fundraisers.
Election Day news coverage from the 41 counties that adopted Diebold touch-screen machines makes it clear that poll worker ignorance about how to use the high-tech equipment and machine glitches were widespread problems in 2005. Diebold technicians in many areas were key in producing the final vote results.
Use of e-voting machines has resulted in two elections with improbable results in Ohio, with potentially catastrophic outcomes for American democracy – especially if they are ignored.
--
Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman are co-authors of HOW THE GOP STOLE AMERICA’S 2004 ELECTION & IS RIGGING 2008, available at www.freepress.org and at www.harveywasserman.com, and, with Steve Rosenfeld, of WHAT HAPPENED IN OHIO?, to be published by the New Press in 2006.
|
 |
Recent Election Issues Articles
An open letter to the Election Assistance Commission December 25, 2005 John Gideon, Executive Director of VotersUnite.Org and Information Manager for VoteTrustUSA.Org
Diebold hack proven in county test! December 17, 2005 Glenn Yeagley
Diebold Inc. in a tailspin after resignation of CEO and filing of a class action fraud lawsuit December 17, 2005 VelvetRevolution.us
Orr thinks machines make voting simpler, more secure December 17, 2005 Mario Bartoletti
Diebold "hack test" - Sec. State / Black Box Lawyer square off December 10, 2005 Black Box Voting
With new legislation, Ohio Republicans plan holiday burial for American Democracy December 6, 2005 Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman
Important daily voting news December 4, 2005 John Gideon
Poll shock November 24, 2005 Robert C. Koehler, Tribune Media Services
Ohio's Diebold Debacle: New machines call election results into question November 24, 2005 Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman
Diebold attempts to evade election transparency laws November 20, 2005 Matt Zimmerman
Supreme Court stabs another GOP knife into US democracy by upholding ex-felon vote ban November 16, 2005 Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman
Has American Democracy died an electronic death in Ohio 2005's referenda defeats? November 11, 2005 Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman
What John Kerry definitely said about 2004’s stolen election and why it's killing American democracy November 10, 2005 Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman
Scrap the "secret" ballot - return to open voting November 5, 2005 Lynn Landes
Clarification of NEDA's withdrawal of Ohio exit poll paper November 5, 2005 Kathy Dopp
Clarification of NEDA's withdrawal of Ohio exit poll paper November 3, 2005 Kathy Dopp, National Election Data Archive
Watergate-style money laundering indictments stoke Ohio's stolen election fires October 28, 2005 Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman
Powerful Government Accountability Office report confirms key 2004 stolen election findings October 26, 2005 Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman
Did you erase your own vote? October 25, 2005 Warren Stewart, Director of Legislative Issues and Policy, www.VoteTrustUSA.org
Why can't the left face the Stolen Elections of 2004 & 2008? October 18, 2005 Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman
Carter/Baker Report can't face how the GOP stole America's 2004 election & is rigging 2008 September 20, 2005 Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman
Two Steps Forward, One Step Back September 20, 2005 Warren Stewart, Director of Legislative Issues and Policy, VoteTrustUSA
FEMA Chief Brown Paid Millions in False Claims to Help Bush Win Fla. Votes September 19, 2005 Jason Leopold
Ohio recount lawsuit set for trial; election workers indicted September 4, 2005 Blair Bobier
Ohio Governor's ethics violations expose money trail to stolen 2004 election August 30, 2005 Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman
Diebold's failure in California August 7, 2005 John Gideon, Information Manager, www.VotersUnite.Org and www.VoteTrustUSA.Org
Did the GOP steal another Ohio Election? August 5, 2005 Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman
Conyers-Kaptur seek special counsel for Noe probe August 4, 2005 John Conyers, Jr. and Marcy Kaptur
Dramatic new charges deepen link between Ohio's "Coingate," Voinovich mob connections, and the theft of the 2004 election July 29, 2005 Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman
None dare call it stolen - Ohio, the election, and America's servile press July 24, 2005 Mark Crispin Miller, summarized by Mary Anne Saucier, Columbus, Ohio
Civic Engagement and the Restoration of Community from a voter activist’s view July 19, 2005 Terri Zins
My report from Hocking County, July 5, 2005: An update on Sherole Eaton's unfolding Story July 7, 2005 Victoria Parks, Ohio Backbone Campaign
Handbook for Ohio Voter Activists, Version 2.0 July 7, 2005 Various activists
Direct testimony: Presented to Election Assessment Hearing July 4, 2005 Richard Hayes Phillips, Ph.D.
Log Cabin Republicans in Ohio July 4, 2005 Richard Hayes Phillips, Ph.D.
With a limp election theft report, Dems prove why they're unworthy June 28, 2005 Harvey Wasserman and Bob Fitrakis
Voting problems and uncounted votes in Lucas County, Ohio June 28, 2005 Justine Smith
The DNC 2004 Election Report: An indictment of incompetence June 25, 2005 Steven Rosenfeld and Bob Fitrakis
Corporate control of the election process June 22, 2005 John Gideon
Introduction: Did George W. Bush steal America's 2004 election? June 16, 2005 Bob Fitrakis, Steve Rosenfeld and Harvey Wasserman
Voter Confidence Committee Calls For Rejection of CA Special Election June 16, 2005 Dave Berman
Activists from 25 states lobby for paper ballots on June 9 and 10 June 10, 2005 VoteTrustUSA.org
Fear of riffraff June 10, 2005 Robert C. Koehler, Tribune Media Services
Electoral Politics and the War: Lessons from 2004 and What the Anti-War Movement Should do in 2006 June 8, 2005 Kevin Zeese
Optical scan machines hacked in Florida June 2, 2005 Black Box Voting
Does ES&S really want to sell the Automark machines? May 28, 2005 John Gideon
Attack on election board whistleblower and leaked Blackwell threats re-fire Ohio's election theft scandal May 23, 2005 Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman
Franklin County, Ohio Election Procedures – April and May 2005 May 6, 2005 Paddy Shaffer
Carter Gets It – But Will His Electoral Commission? April 24, 2005 Kevin Zeese and Linda Schade
Voter Perceptions and Political Deceptions: Federal, Ohio and Knox April 24, 2005 Mike Swinford
Electoral reform groups call for James Baker's resignation from electoral reform commission April 17, 2005 Ilene Proctor
National Conference on Election Reform Opens with Civil Rights Panel April 13, 2005 Abigail Thorton
View from Another Planet April 13, 2005 Josh Mitteldorf
Democrats! Paper “Trails” Aren’t Good Enough. Count The Damn Ballots! April 12, 2005 Lynn Landes
Democrats, Paper ‘Trails’ Aren’t Good Enough; Count The Damn Ballots! April 1, 2005 Lynn Landes, Online Journal Contributing Writer
Scientific Analysis Suggests Presidential Vote Counts May Have Been Altered March 30, 2005 US Vote Counts
As Blackwell Says, Ohio’s in 2004 was a National Model March 24, 2005 Steve Rosenfeld, Bob Fitrakis, and Harvey Wasserman
Understanding the difference between paper ballots and paper audit trails March 20, 2005 Gary Beckwith
Save Our Democracy March 16, 2005 John Irwin
Republicans maneuvering to get Voting Rights Act killed March 10, 2005 Rev. Jesse L. Jackson, Sr.
Legal filing highlights Blackwell's hypocrisy in Ohio recount case March 7, 2005 Blair Bobier
Selma 40 Years Later March 6, 2005 Rev. Jesse L. Jackson, Sr.
Exit Poll Madness - Analyst Steve Freeman & Company Offer False Choice March 4, 2005 Lynn Landes
Libertarians To Testify in Ohio House: Modernize Ohio's Election Laws March 3, 2005 Robert Butler
The New Voting Rights Movement Begins Here Today March 2, 2005 Steven Rosenfeld
Voting in America February 28, 2005 Bob Babson
The Mighty Texas Strike Force February 28, 2005 Nick Mottern - Documentary News Service
Blackwell presidential election sanctions briefs February 22, 2005 Various individuals
Representative Conyers and others file amicus brief in Ohio Supreme Court February 17, 2005 Dena Graziano
Congresswoman Tubbs Jones Outraged at Blackwell's Failure to Appear During House Administration Hearing February 12, 2005 Office of Rep. Tubbs Jones
Ohio Attorney-General's attack on election protection attorneys draws mountain of documentation on state's stolen election, including new study on exit polls February 3, 2005 Steve Rosenfeld and Harvey Wasserman
Prominent Statisticians Refute 'Explanation' of 2004 U.S. Exit Poll Discrepancies in New Edison/Mitofsky Report and Urge Investigation of U.S. Presidential Election Results January 31, 2005 Bruce O'Dell
The last man to concede... January 29, 2005 Sheila Samples
Report on Washington DC, January 6, 2005 January 25, 2005 Avram Friedman
Arkansas in 2004: Did Bush Really Win? January 24, 2005 Max Standridge
New links January 23, 2005 Free Press staff
Voting Problems and Uncounted Votes in Lucas County, Ohio January 23, 2005 Justine Smith
Plan B: Parallel Elections & Signed Ballots January 20, 2005 Lynn Landes
Open Letter to Ohio Attorney General Jim Petro from Representative John Conyers, Jr. January 20, 2005 Representative John Conyers, Jr.
Open Letter to Warren Mitofsky and Larry Rosin from Representative John Conyers, Jr. January 20, 2005 Representative John Conyers, Jr.
Ohio's GOP Attorney General launches revenge attack on Election Protection legal team January 19, 2005 Steve Rosenfeld and Harvey Wasserman
What are they hiding in New Mexico? January 18, 2005 Warren Stewart, National Ballot Integrity Project
In the Shadow of Dr. King, counting the vote remains a civil rights issue January 17, 2005 Bob Fitrakis, Steve Rosenfeld and Harvey Wasserman
Did the “Liberal Media” Get the 2004 Election All Wrong?
January 16, 2005 Gene C. Gerard
'COUNT EVERY VOTE. EVERY VOTE COUNTS' January 16, 2005 Mary Anne Saucier
Moss v. Bush moves on and movement continues January 13, 2005 Bob Fitrakis, Steve Rosenfeld and Harvey Wasserman
Rally Continues Drive for Democracy January 9, 2005 Mark Huntress
Estimated vote count in Ohio January 8, 2005 Richard Hayes Phillips, Ph.D.
January 6 Washington, D.C. rally report January 8, 2005 Nick Mottern
Together, we moved three mountains January 8, 2005 Bob Fitrakis, Steve Rosenfeld and Harvey Wasserman
What the election challenge means January 8, 2005 David Swanson, ILCA
Progressive Democrats lead historic voting rights protest as Congress ratifies flawed 2004 Electoral College tally January 7, 2005 Bob Fitrakis, Steve Rosenfeld and Harvey Wasserman
Arnebeck letter to Congress re Presidential Electoral Challenge January 6, 2005 Clifford O. Arnebeck, Jr.
Senator Barbara Boxer, D-CA and Representative Stephanie Tubbs Jones, D-OH contested the election January 6, 2005 Free Press staff
The "Crime of November 2": The human side of how Bush stole Ohio, and why Congress must investigate rather than ratify the Electoral College (Part Two of Two) January 5, 2005 Bob Fitrakis, Steve Rosenfeld and Harvey Wasserman
Status Report of the House Judiciary Committee Democratic Staff January 5, 2005 U.S. Rep. John Conyers and staff
Seven key reasons why the vote must be challenged at the electoral college January 3, 2005 Rev. Jesse Jackson, Rainbow/PUSH Coalition
Ten preliminary reasons why the Bush vote does not compute, and why Congress must investigate rather than certify the Electoral College (Part One of Two) January 3, 2005 Bob Fitrakis, Steve Rosenfeld and Harvey Wasserman
Verified election contest petitions and documents in Ohio Supreme Court January 2, 2005 The undersigned
Distribution of voting machines by county in Ohio January 1, 2005 Andy Shifflette
Did We Bounce An Election? January 1, 2005 Warren Stewart, votersunite.org
Presidential election congressional hearing transcript January 1, 2005 Congresspeople Waters, Tubbs-Jones and Conyers and others
Read Election Issues Articles by Year: 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 |