Sat May 18 2013
Departments
Election Issues

Wolf Blitzer loses Democratic debate
by David Swanson
November 20, 2007

That does it. It's time for the Democratic Party to stage its own debate, ask its own questions, and offer the video to networks as a completed package. Allowing CNN to not just air a debate but to ask the questions proved on Thursday night (even more dramatically than in the past) to be a soul sickening disaster.

A serious debate would begin by asking each candidate (including Mike Gravel, who was locked out of the room) what he or she would do if elected president. Thursday's debate in the opening 30 minutes had me longing for even the level of honesty and substance of the MSNBC debate hosted by Keith Olbermann in Soldier Field some months back, at which Olbermann managed the superhuman feat of asking things like "Would you cancel NAFTA?"

On Thursday Wolf Blitzer devoted the first 20 minutes to goading Clinton and Obama into bashing each other over how they have run their campaigns. Edwards was given a token 60 seconds to join the fight. At 8:18 (the debate began at 8:00 p.m. ET) Biden was permitted to add his two cents. At 8:20, Edwards was asked to bash Clinton from another angle. He took the bait, but then turned to the topic of poverty, in open violation of WB's rules. (Blitzer had announced at the start that candidates would not be permitted to stray from the topics of the questions asked.) At 8:23 Dodd got to speak, still on the debate over the debate. At 8:24 Richardson was allowed to add to the same substance-free topic. He introduced himself to the crowd as a way of registering his disastisfaction with being ignored for 24 minutes.

At 8:26, with Kucinich not having had the opportunity to say one word, CNN asked all the candidates to say whether they would support the Democratic nominee no matter what. They all said yes, except for Kucinich, who took the opportunity to say 10 words, receiving huge applause. His words were: "Only if they oppose war as an instrument of policy." A little vaguely worded, but I don't think that vagueness was Kucinich's intention. I think his intention was to contrast his own position with that of most of the other people on the stage. If he is not nominated, he is not going to be able to support the nominee.

Half an hour into this train wreck, no candidate had had an opportunity to speak to their priorities, but we heard a lot about CNN's. At 8:27 CNN asked Obama about immigration. At 8:29 WB dumbed this down and asked all the candidates for opinions on giving drivers' licenses to undocumented people. At 8:32 Kucinich got a chance to say his 11th word. He shifted the topic to NAFTA and took exception to the stupid question, refusing to answer it, winning loud applause.

Then CNN started asking various candidates about education, and for the first time asked Kucinich a non yes/no question. But instead of sticking with education, the topic of the questions before and after Kucinich's, WB asked Kucinich what he disagrees with labor unions on. Kucinich's answer was good, but not inspired. Maybe after 37 minutes, the Congressman had drifted off into daydreaming.

After education, CNN asked every candidate except Kucinich about Pakistan. At the end of this segment, at 8:52, Kucinich said "Hello? Hello?" But CNN refused to ask him a question.

Next CNN turned to Iraq, and this time Kucinich was included. He said that Congress should cut off the funding [big applause]. Then he answered the Pakistan question that CNN had refused to ask him. Blitzer quickly cut him off.

At 8:58, CNN came back to Kucinich on China trade, and he nailed it. And he criticized Edwards for having voted for normal trade relations with China. Edwards dodged the question. And Edwards criticized NAFTA, although he has made clear he will not end it. WB asked Clinton whether NAFTA was a mistake. She answered by talking about Chinese pet food. He asked again, and Clinton said NAFTA did not deliver on what she had hoped it would do. Dodd criticized Clinton and Obama for supporting the Peruvian trade agreement.

At 9:07 CNN's "clean coal" sponsored debate turned to energy questions. By this point, even Obama was criticizing WB for repeatedly framing questions along the lines of "Assuming we can't find a serious solution, what should we do about ...?" Criticism of WB was becoming the easiest way to garner applause. Richardson also rejected WB's frame and shifted the topic to renewable energy. CNN quickly brought the blather back to nonsense and specifically the topic of Hillary Clinton being a woman.

The second half of the debate included pre-arranged questions from non-CNN employees. The first question came from a 3-tour Iraq veteran and his mother. He said he wanted the troops brought home now and not sent to Iran. She asked what the candidates would do now to prevent an attack on Iran. But CNN only allowed Biden, Clinton, Edwards, and Obama to answer. Clinton talked "carrots and sticks," while the rest of them criticized her vote to name the Quds force "terrorists." But Biden broke from the script in a surprising way.

"If Bush takes the country to war in Iran without an act of Congress," Biden said, "then he should be impeached!" [applause]

Richardson said something useful on the next question: he'd end the occupation by 2010. But Kucinich was not given the opportunity to say he'd end it in 2008.

When WB finally turned to Kucinich, rewording an audience member's question, he said "You were the only one who voted against the PATRIOT Act..."

"That's because I read it," Kucinich interjected to huge applause.

Kucinich nailed the question and turned to the topic of preventing an attack on Iran as well. WB saw what was coming and tried to cut him off, but Kucinich said "Impeach them now!" [huge applause]

Them. He did not say Cheney only.

Kucinich was only permitted to speak that one time during the debate's entire second hour.

A few questions later, Biden got applause for refusing to answer a CNN question and insisting that he would answer the question of the audience member.

Biden also said he had a plan to end the war that could begin the day he becomes president, a promise made by most of the candidates on the stage. If an intelligent moderator were asking the questions at these debates, the fact that the Senate now faces a vote on another $50 billion for the occupation would have come up, and the fact that neither Biden nor Obama nor Clinton nor Dodd is willing to filibuster it would have been brought up. Instead, the entire debate included no mention of Wednesday's vote in the House or the upcoming vote in the Senate. A moderator who loves to catch candidates in even the most trivial contradictions had not one word to say about the topic of funding an occupation they all claim to want to end.

Instead, time was found for an audience member to ask Clinton whether she "prefers diamonds or pearls."

Wolf Blitzer lost this one. The ranks of non-voters probably won.




Recent Election Issues Articles

Nonviolent resisters put Senator Clinton on notice
  December 23, 2007
  Pete Perry

In-depth, post-EVEREST interview with Ohio's Secretary of State
  December 21, 2007
  Brad Friedman

The phrase that could defeat Hillary Clinton
  December 19, 2007
  Paul Rogat Loeb

Ohio will likely face big vote-counting problems in 2008
  December 19, 2007
  Steven Rosenfeld

"Critical security failures" leads Ohio Sec. of State to recommend ban of DRE (touch-screen) voting machines
  December 17, 2007
  Brad Friedman

Ohio Secretary of State confirms 2004 election could have been stolen
  December 14, 2007
  Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman

Kucinich first, Edwards second in PDA straw poll
  December 7, 2007
  Tim Carpenter

Hillary and the politics of disappointment
  December 2, 2007
  Paul Rogat Loeb

Voting can be a real battle for U.S. troops and others overseas in the 2008 primaries
  December 2, 2007
  Loretta (Laurie) Ahlrich

Wolf Blitzer loses Democratic debate
  November 20, 2007
  David Swanson

Another Clinton campaign fraud
  November 15, 2007
  David Swanson

We remember… Nov. 2 memorial anniversary of the 2004 Ohio election
  November 6, 2007
  Paddy Shaffer

The weak slat under the bed of democracy
  October 31, 2007
  Michael Winship

Aurora Dairy exemption from check-off program challenged; USDA should demand retroactive payment from faux organic milk producers
  October 31, 2007
  Mark Kastel

Kucinich tops other Dem Presidential leaders in key CA straw poll
  October 30, 2007
  David Swanson

Will the GOP election theft machine do it again in 2008?
  October 19, 2007
  Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman

Exactly how the good guys finally won
  October 2, 2007
  David Swanson

Voter purging: a legal way for Republicans to swing elections?
  September 16, 2007
  Steven Rosenfeld

Why doesn't the GOP want Ohio's voting machines tested?
  September 11, 2007
  Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman

The Cat in the Hat, elusive happy endings, and the [election] mess that is so big, and so deep, and so tall
  September 9, 2007
  Joan Brunwasser, OpEdNews     

The Death of the DRE: gone the way of Lawn Jarts
  September 3, 2007
  Christopher Wilson

Fooled Again series: exclusive interview with Michael Collins
  September 1, 2007
  Joan Brunwasser, Voting Integrity editor, OpEdNews

Fooled again series: exclusive interview with "Diebold whistleblower" Steve Heller
  August 27, 2007
  Joan Brunwasser, Voting Integrity editor, OpEdNews

The Dan Rather voting machine special, a recipe for election disaster, and serious food for thought
  August 24, 2007
  Joan Brunwasser

Resistance of one
  August 10, 2007
  David Swanson

The dog ate my homework continues: inter-office Ohio Board of Elections email prompted by SAVE THE BALLOTS website gives a glimpse into the attitudes of Ohio election officials
  August 9, 2007
  Paddy Shaffer

Look at who runs our boards of elections
  August 9, 2007
  Richard Hayes Phillips, Ph.D.

Restore health to America's elections and pull the plug on SDD virus threat
  August 8, 2007
  Michael Richardson

Paper ballots for California: Secretary of State announces de-certification/re-certification plans for e-voting systems
  August 4, 2007
  Brad Friedman from Plano, TX, with help from Emily Levy of VelvetRevolution.us and Tom Courbat of SAVE R VOTE

The dog ate my homework
  August 3, 2007
  Richard Hayes Phillips and Patricia "Paddy" Shaffer

Welcome to jail for destruction of election records… for some of the ladies and gentlemen of the Ohio Boards of Elections!
  August 3, 2007
  Paddy Shaffer

The criminal cover-up of Ohio's stolen 2004 election sinks to the fraudulent, the absurd, the pathetic
  August 2, 2007
  Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman

Part II – Squire v. Geer: Facts the Magistrate left out are even more shocking than the ones he included
  July 30, 2007
  Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman

Will Bush cancel the 2008 election?
  July 30, 2007
  Harvey Wasserman & Bob Fitrakis

Ohio's 2004 presidential election records missing or destroyed
  July 30, 2007
  Steven Rosenfeld

Sausage making and electronic voting machines
  July 27, 2007
  Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman

Shreds of evidence
  July 26, 2007
  Richard Hayes Phillips, Ph.D.

Missing records and record access in Ohio, July 2007
  July 25, 2007
  Paddy Shaffer

On-site observations of the hand-counting of paper ballots and recommendations for the general election of 2008
  July 24, 2007
  Sheila Parks

Sicko ?
  July 3, 2007
  Joan Brunwasser, OpEdNews

John Edwards supports "open source" for voting systems
  June 27, 2007
  Alan Dechert

Will electronic voting reform create new ways to steal elections?
  June 6, 2007
  Steven Rosenfeld

US Attorney resigns following Conyers’ request for BBC documents
  June 2, 2007
  Greg Palast

Will Al Gore face his inconvenient truths about our stolen elections?
  May 18, 2007
  Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman

Giving the voters "poisoned food" to "nourish" democracy
  May 17, 2007
  Marj Creech

In the land of the free, and the home of the brave
  May 17, 2007
  Paul R. Lehto

The globalization of electronic election theft
  May 11, 2007
  Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman

RFK:  Rove and Rove's brain, 'Should be in jail,' not in office
  May 9, 2007
  Greg Palast

Introducing Psephos
  April 25, 2007
  Paul R. Lehto

Are Rove's missing e-mails the smoking guns of the stolen 2004 election?
  April 25, 2007
  Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman

The GOP's cyber election hit squad
  April 22, 2007
  Steven Rosenfeld and Bob Fitrakis

Another path to peace: the case for Kucinich
  April 19, 2007
  David Swanson

Virtual election season
  April 16, 2007
  David Swanson

Bye bye to Cleveland GOP Election Chair Bob "Ballots for Bush" Bennett
  April 16, 2007
  Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman

Bye bye to Cleveland GOP Election Chair Bob "Ballots for Bush" Bennett
  April 15, 2007
  Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman

Auditing the mid-term election
  April 6, 2007
  Richard Hayes Phillips

Two big victories boost Ohio's election protection movement
  April 5, 2007
  Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman

More potential 2004 election illegalities rock Ohio's Hocking County as Cleveland braces for a legal firestorm
  March 30, 2007
  Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman

New Ohio evidence exposes apparently illegal 2004 recount activity by Hocking County's GOP Election Director, and a stinging complaint is filed in Cleveland
  March 26, 2007
  Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman

Explosive new vote fraud developments continue to rock Ohio and Florida
  March 23, 2007
  Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman

Forced resignations and stiff prison sentences intensify the escalating blowback from Ohio's 2004 stolen election
  March 20, 2007
  Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman

Election fraud, my ass
  March 16, 2007
  Paul Rogat Loeb

After Ohio's recount rigging convictions in Cuyahoga, is Coshocton County next?
  March 6, 2007
  Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman

Florida setting example
  March 3, 2007
  Free Press staff

Sequoia Voting Systems contract with San Francisco needs added section to ensure transparency
  February 13, 2007
  Brent Turner, Open Voting Consortium

Ohio's spreading stolen 2004 election scandal claims another victim
  February 10, 2007
  Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman

First criminal convictions from Ohio's stolen 2004 election confirm recount was rigged
  January 27, 2007
  Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman

Election attorneys amplify importance of convictions for recount rigging in Ohio 2004 presidential race
  January 26, 2007
  Paul Lehto

Do new Ohio recount prosecutions indicate unraveling of 2004 election theft cover-up?
  January 19, 2007
  Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman

The mystic voting hall: for the love of democracy
  January 5, 2007
  Sheri Myers

DREs, magic and other sleights of hand
  January 4, 2007
  Rady Ananda




Read Election Issues Articles by Year:
2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000



FREE PRESS EMAIL UPDATE


Donate to the Free Press Election Protection Fund to help us investigate and monitor election fraud in this year's election.


Donate to The Free Press The Free Press Store

FOLLOW US ON
twitter
facebook


SEARCH THE FREEPRESS




1021 E. Broad St. Columbus, OH 43205 | 614.253.2571 | truth@freepress.org
All content © 1970-2012 The Columbus Free Press
Disclaimer