 |
Thu May 22 2008 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
Departments Election Issues "Critical security failures" leads Ohio Sec. of State to recommend ban of DRE (touch-screen) voting machines by Brad Friedman December 17, 2007 Result of State's First Ever Testing of E-Voting Systems Find All Systems 'Vulnerable' to Manipulation and Theft by 'Simple Techniques' SoS Brunner Recommends Paper Ballots Optically-Scanned at County Headquarters for Buckeye State... The results of new, unprecedented testing of e-voting machines in the state of Ohio are in, and the findings mirror the landmark results of a similar test carried out earlier this year in California. "Ohio's electronic voting systems have 'critical security failures' which could impact the integrity of elections in the Buckeye State," says Ohio Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner in a statement which accompanied the release of the report today on the SoS' website. Brunner, a Democrat, was joined in her press conference (video now here), called today to discuss the results of the testing, by Ohio's Republican House Speaker, Jon Husted. Brunner is calling for a ban on all Direct Recording Electronic (DRE, usually touch-screen) voting systems in the state, along with a ban on precinct-based optical-scan paper based systems, charging that the central counting of ballots at the county would eliminate "points of entry creating unnecessary voting system risk." The State's bi-partisan "Evaluation & Validation of Election-Related Equipment, Standards & Testing" (EVEREST) report finds, as did California's study, as did virtually every other independent test of such systems, that violating the security and manipulating the "federal approved" electronic voting systems, is a breeze. "To put it in every-day terms," Brunner said, "the tools needed to compromise an accurate vote count could be as simple as tampering with the paper audit trail connector or using a magnet and a personal digital assistant." "The results underscore the need for a fundamental change in the structure of Ohio’s election system to ensure ballot and voting system security while still making voting convenient and accessible to all Ohio voters," said Brunner, who has come under fire from Election Integrity advocates for failing to act quickly enough concerning the voting systems to be used in next year's crucial election, as well as for failing to seek accountability for the exceedingly well-documented and now-infamous charges of election fraud and voter suppression in the 2004 Presidential election under her predecessor J. Kenneth Blackwell. While the effort is long overdue in Ohio, actions being taken by Brunner, in light of the test results, are less stringent than those taken by California Secretary of State Debra Bowen after tests in her state. Brunner's recommendations, some of them quite puzzling, are likely to come under some fire in the bargain, from Election Integrity advocates in Ohio and elsewhere... Results of the Ohio tests were submitted to Brunner's office last week. The testing was carried out by several teams of testers from both the commercial and academic computer science and security communities, and included systems used in the state of Ohio, as made by Diebold (now known as Premier), Election Systems & Software (ES&S) and Hart Intercivic, All of the systems were found vulnerable to easy tampering. "In an era of computer-based voting systems, voters have a right to expect that their voting system is at least as secure as the systems they use for banking and communication," Brunner said today. However, while making a number of recommendations for changes to the voting system, as based on the testing, she has notably not decertified any of the vulnerable systems, as she would be allowed, according to Buckeye State statute. After testing In California, Secretary of State Debra Bowen decertified all of the states voting systems, and re-certified them under stringent new security requirements. Among them, the allowance for only a single DRE voting system made by either Diebold or Sequoia Voting Systems can be used in a polling place in order to marginally meet federal voting requirements for voters with disabilities. She mandated that the so-called "paper trails" produced by those systems be 100% hand-counted after each election. Criticism from the Election Integrity Community Columbus Free Press investigative journalists Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman, contend that Brunner's admissions in the wake of EVEREST testing means that "Ohio's top election official has finally confirmed that the 2004 election could have been easily stolen." Pointing to the similar findings from the California study, the Free Press --- which has been perhaps the most assiduous of media investigators into what happened during Ohio's 2004 Presidential election --- alleges in their report today on EVEREST, that the findings suggest vulnerabilities in America's --- and specifically Ohio's --- voting system are far worse than has been generally acknowledged by the public and the media:
Coming in the state that decided the 2004 election for George W. Bush, Brunner's confirmation of the electoral system's vulnerabilities adds huge new weight to the charge that the Buckeye State's vote count was stolen. They also point out that though all 88 counties in Ohio were ordered by a federal judge to retain their ballots from the '04 election, 56 of them either "destroyed" or "lost" some "1.6 million ballots, cast and uncast, needed for definitive auditing procedures." Both Brunner and State Attorney General Marc Dann, another recently elected Democrat, have come under fire from Election Integrity advocates for failing to hold anyone accountable for the destruction of those ballots, as well as for several well-known acts of improprieties by county officials across the state in 2004 which allegedly results in millions of uncounted and uncast votes, predominately in Democratic-leaning minority areas of the state. Though central tabulators made by the same companies were in use during the 2004 election, most of the states newer DRE electronic voting systems where not implemented until the 2005 election when still-unexplained results managed to turn down a number of election reform measure that were on the ballot under Blackwell's reign. Some 44 of Ohio's 88 counties had implemented touch-screen systems made by Diebold for that election. Each subsequent election has led to embarrassment for residents of Ohio, most notably in Cuyahoga County (Cleveland) where Brunner removed the entire Board of Elections shortly after taking office in early 2007. Could New Recommendations Lead to Still More Trouble? Brunner's recommendation, and failure to decertify the most dangerous of the voting systems, could lead to even more trouble ahead for Ohio. Voting system and security experts have previously argued that decentralized precinct-based counting was more secure than central, county-based counting since results could be both counted, and posted at the polling place on election night, prior to transport of ballots, and vulnerable recording media to county offices. During the 2004 election, investigators have maintained, chicanery occurred at the county level on election night. One such now-infamous incident occurred in Warren County, one of the last to announce results for the November 2004 election, when a supposed terrorist threat led county officials to shut the public and media out of the counting room. The unprecedented action still remains unexplained to this day. Nobody at either the FBI or Dept. of Homeland Security has admitted to giving such a warning to Warren County, and the officials in Warren who claimed they did have never offered the names of any such individuals. Neither Brunner nor Dann have investigated the disturbing allegations surrounding that incident either, to our knowledge. Central tabulators which process paper-based optical-scan ballots are notoriously vulnerable to hacking as well. Though, in theory, proper audits of paper ballots might reveal tampering in the event that a tabulator is hacked, decentralized counting and posting of results is generally acknowledged by experts to make such tampering far more difficult to accomplish without detection. Brunner's statement admits that "the researchers commented that with the lack of technical measures in voting system design, its integrity 'is provided purely by the integrity and honesty of election officials.'" Such officials would still be responsible for overseeing all tabulation at the county level under Brunner's new recommendations. A recent report from Houston, earlier this month, highlighted the ease by which a single individual could change the results for an entire county election with just the push of a few keystrokes on a county-based central tabulator. VotersUnite.org's Executive Director, John Gideon, a frequent contributor to The BRAD BLOG, notes that central-based ballot scanning also makes recommendations by the federal Help America Vote Act (HAVA) for notification of over-voting on ballots, virtually impossible. "The vendors are already lining up to sell their expensive, high-speed scanners to Ohio," he tells us. He also pointed out problems seen in recent elections with counties who have "outsourced" their counting to voting system vendors at the county level, instead of relying on the more decentralized and more transparent precinct-based optical-scan systems, while mentioning that he's so far had difficult finding information in the EVEREST report that is critical to such vote-counting methods. "All the stuff I've seen in there so far refers to DREs, not op-scan," Gideon said. In addition to central based optical-scanning, Brunner made several recommendations that would push the state closer to all absentee ("vote-by-mail") voting. She has recommended "no fault" absentee voting and "Election Day Vote Centers" to combine precincts into "super precincts". Election experts have long regarded absentee voting as the most vulnerable to fraud, manipulation and "vote-buying". While Voting Centers have had a short, but storied history of recent failure in places like Denver, where technical problems during the '06 election created impossibly long lines, and likely kept hundreds of thousands of voters from being able even cast a vote. Brunner has also recommending that special "issues only" elections, such as the one to be held next August in Ohio, be carried out as a "vote-by-mail" election, with no in person voting. While Democrats across the country, including even California's SoS Bowen, have begun to recommend "vote-by-mail" as a cure to the woes of electronic voting, many Election Integrity advocates are warning against such a move, arguing that both transparency and ballot secrecy is greatly diminished by mail-only elections. The possibilities of fraud, they also argue, are greatly increased in the bargain. The Ohio Secretary of State's page, with links to report from the EVEREST testing, is available here. Email this article to a friend |
Don't forget to check out articles from 2007 and 2008
"Nonviolent resisters put Senator Clinton on notice"
December 23, 2007
Pete Perry
"In-depth, post-EVEREST interview with Ohio's Secretary of State"
December 21, 2007
Brad Friedman
"The phrase that could defeat Hillary Clinton"
December 19, 2007
Paul Rogat Loeb
"Ohio will likely face big vote-counting problems in 2008"
December 19, 2007
Steven Rosenfeld
""Critical security failures" leads Ohio Sec. of State to recommend ban of DRE (touch-screen) voting machines"
December 17, 2007
Brad Friedman
"Ohio Secretary of State confirms 2004 election could have been stolen"
December 14, 2007
Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman
"Kucinich first, Edwards second in PDA straw poll"
December 7, 2007
Tim Carpenter
"Hillary and the politics of disappointment"
December 2, 2007
Paul Rogat Loeb
"Voting can be a real battle for U.S. troops and others overseas in the 2008 primaries"
December 2, 2007
Loretta (Laurie) Ahlrich
"Wolf Blitzer loses Democratic debate"
November 20, 2007
David Swanson
"Another Clinton campaign fraud"
November 15, 2007
David Swanson
"We remember… Nov. 2 memorial anniversary of the 2004 Ohio election"
November 6, 2007
Paddy Shaffer
"The weak slat under the bed of democracy"
October 31, 2007
Michael Winship
"Aurora Dairy exemption from check-off program challenged; USDA should demand retroactive payment from faux organic milk producers"
October 31, 2007
Mark Kastel
"Kucinich tops other Dem Presidential leaders in key CA straw poll"
October 30, 2007
David Swanson
"Will the GOP election theft machine do it again in 2008?"
October 19, 2007
Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman
"Exactly how the good guys finally won"
October 2, 2007
David Swanson
"Voter purging: a legal way for Republicans to swing elections?"
September 16, 2007
Steven Rosenfeld
"Why doesn't the GOP want Ohio's voting machines tested?"
September 11, 2007
Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman
"The Cat in the Hat, elusive happy endings, and the [election] mess that is so big, and so deep, and so tall"
September 9, 2007
Joan Brunwasser, OpEdNews
"The Death of the DRE: gone the way of Lawn Jarts"
September 3, 2007
Christopher Wilson
"Fooled Again series: exclusive interview with Michael Collins"
September 1, 2007
Joan Brunwasser, Voting Integrity editor, OpEdNews
"Fooled again series: exclusive interview with "Diebold whistleblower" Steve Heller"
August 27, 2007
Joan Brunwasser, Voting Integrity editor, OpEdNews
"The Dan Rather voting machine special, a recipe for election disaster, and serious food for thought"
August 24, 2007
Joan Brunwasser
"Resistance of one"
August 10, 2007
David Swanson
"The dog ate my homework continues: inter-office Ohio Board of Elections email prompted by SAVE THE BALLOTS website gives a glimpse into the attitudes of Ohio election officials"
August 9, 2007
Paddy Shaffer
"Look at who runs our boards of elections"
August 9, 2007
Richard Hayes Phillips, Ph.D.
"Restore health to America's elections and pull the plug on SDD virus threat"
August 8, 2007
Michael Richardson
"Paper ballots for California: Secretary of State announces de-certification/re-certification plans for e-voting systems"
August 4, 2007
Brad Friedman from Plano, TX, with help from Emily Levy of VelvetRevolution.us and Tom Courbat of SAVE R VOTE
"The dog ate my homework"
August 3, 2007
Richard Hayes Phillips and Patricia "Paddy" Shaffer
"Welcome to jail for destruction of election records… for some of the ladies and gentlemen of the Ohio Boards of Elections!"
August 3, 2007
Paddy Shaffer
"The criminal cover-up of Ohio's stolen 2004 election sinks to the fraudulent, the absurd, the pathetic"
August 2, 2007
Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman
"Part II – Squire v. Geer: Facts the Magistrate left out are even more shocking than the ones he included"
July 30, 2007
Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman
"Will Bush cancel the 2008 election?"
July 30, 2007
Harvey Wasserman & Bob Fitrakis
"Ohio's 2004 presidential election records missing or destroyed"
July 30, 2007
Steven Rosenfeld
"Sausage making and electronic voting machines"
July 27, 2007
Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman
"Shreds of evidence"
July 26, 2007
Richard Hayes Phillips, Ph.D.
"Missing records and record access in Ohio, July 2007"
July 25, 2007
Paddy Shaffer
"On-site observations of the hand-counting of paper ballots and recommendations for the general election of 2008"
July 24, 2007
Sheila Parks
"Sicko ?"
July 3, 2007
Joan Brunwasser, OpEdNews
"John Edwards supports "open source" for voting systems"
June 27, 2007
Alan Dechert
"Will electronic voting reform create new ways to steal elections?"
June 6, 2007
Steven Rosenfeld
"US Attorney resigns following Conyers’ request for BBC documents"
June 2, 2007
Greg Palast
"Will Al Gore face his inconvenient truths about our stolen elections?"
May 18, 2007
Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman
"Giving the voters "poisoned food" to "nourish" democracy"
May 17, 2007
Marj Creech
"In the land of the free, and the home of the brave"
May 17, 2007
Paul R. Lehto
"The globalization of electronic election theft"
May 11, 2007
Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman
"RFK: Rove and Rove's brain, 'Should be in jail,' not in office"
May 9, 2007
Greg Palast
"Introducing Psephos"
April 25, 2007
Paul R. Lehto
"Are Rove's missing e-mails the smoking guns of the stolen 2004 election?"
April 25, 2007
Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman
"The GOP's cyber election hit squad"
April 22, 2007
Steven Rosenfeld and Bob Fitrakis
"Another path to peace: the case for Kucinich"
April 19, 2007
David Swanson
"Virtual election season"
April 16, 2007
David Swanson
"Bye bye to Cleveland GOP Election Chair Bob "Ballots for Bush" Bennett"
April 16, 2007
Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman
"Bye bye to Cleveland GOP Election Chair Bob "Ballots for Bush" Bennett"
April 15, 2007
Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman
"Auditing the mid-term election"
April 6, 2007
Richard Hayes Phillips
"Two big victories boost Ohio's election protection movement"
April 5, 2007
Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman
"More potential 2004 election illegalities rock Ohio's Hocking County as Cleveland braces for a legal firestorm"
March 30, 2007
Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman
"New Ohio evidence exposes apparently illegal 2004 recount activity by Hocking County's GOP Election Director, and a stinging complaint is filed in Cleveland"
March 26, 2007
Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman
"Explosive new vote fraud developments continue to rock Ohio and Florida"
March 23, 2007
Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman
"Forced resignations and stiff prison sentences intensify the escalating blowback from Ohio's 2004 stolen election"
March 20, 2007
Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman
"Election fraud, my ass"
March 16, 2007
Paul Rogat Loeb
"After Ohio's recount rigging convictions in Cuyahoga, is Coshocton County next?"
March 6, 2007
Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman
"Florida setting example"
March 3, 2007
Free Press staff
"Sequoia Voting Systems contract with San Francisco needs added section to ensure transparency"
February 13, 2007
Brent Turner, Open Voting Consortium
"Ohio's spreading stolen 2004 election scandal claims another victim"
February 10, 2007
Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman
"First criminal convictions from Ohio's stolen 2004 election confirm recount was rigged"
January 27, 2007
Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman
"Election attorneys amplify importance of convictions for recount rigging in Ohio 2004 presidential race"
January 26, 2007
Paul Lehto
"Do new Ohio recount prosecutions indicate unraveling of 2004 election theft cover-up?"
January 19, 2007
Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman
"The mystic voting hall: for the love of democracy"
January 5, 2007
Sheri Myers
"DREs, magic and other sleights of hand"
January 4, 2007
Rady Ananda
Read Articles by Year:
2007 2006 2005 2004
2003 2002 2001 2000
All content © 1970-2008
The Columbus Free Press
Disclaimer