 |
Tue Dec 02 2008
|
|
|
Departments National Issues
Republicans Seem to Want to Keep Computerized Voting Easily Corruptible
by Rob Kall
September 10, 2003
Before the age of computers, there were all kinds of ways for a local politico to "mess" with the voting apparatus. He could arrange for a mechanical machine to count wrong. Or, the names of people in cemeteries could be kept or put on the voter rolls.
But now, in the wondrous age of computers and the internet, it's possible, with a virtually undetectable line of software code that can make itself disappear after its done its dirty work, to wreak corruption on hundreds or thousands of computerized voting machines reflecting hundreds of thousands or millions of votes. A number of recent elections are suspected of being tainted by this voting corruption. We've opened a Pandora's box with computerized voting, not knowing what was going to come out.
But it looks like the Republicans like the way things are, in spite of clear proof of a multitude of errors and easily corruptible vote counting. US Congressman Russ Holt introduced a bill earlier in the year that would take many of the risks out of computerized voting, and it would add safeguards to prevent theft of elections or computerized tampering with the voting process.
It seems that any patriotic American who cherishes the central role of an honest voting process in the maintenance of democracy would almost by reflex support a bill that would make voting safer and more honest. Yet since the bill was introduced, not one republican congressman has signed on to the bill.
Now, one might not expect enemies of democracy and the law, like Tom DeLay, support such a bill. But it is shocking that not one single Republican has the spine, the courage, the commitment to democracy to support a bill that should be receiving bi-partisan support. It is a sad time when elected representatives respond in lock step, obedience to the ruling (in this case hedless) leaders, rather than voting based on principles or for the good of the nation.
It's been shown repeatedly that when mistakes have been made by computerized systems, and there have been hundreds of them, the mistakes almost unfailingly are in favor of Republicans. While there is no clear proof yet, there are a lot of people who believe that a number of congressional, senatorial and gubernatorial elections have been stolen by electronic tampering.
One reader suggested that tampering with the voting process is such a serious offense that the punishment should be the death penalty. But the fact is the punishment for vote fraud is less than it is for other forms of criminal fraud.
We need smart, strict laws that regulate computerized voting so it provides the benefits of the power of computers, while eliminating any risks of vote corruption or manipulation. This is such simple, common sense, it's very hard to understand why any honest politician would oppose it.
Voting systems must provide a voter verifiable audit trail, Software fraud expert Rebecca Mercuri reported at the Computerized voting forum held Sept. 7, in Philadelphia (organized by investigative reporter Lynn Landes.)
Mercuri, who has become a widely cited expert on voting software, says "A vote that can not be counted is not a vote." And the fact is, that the way most computerized voting systems work, you can't count the votes after their cast. You have to trust the software company, and trust that no-one is tampering with the software or the data. You have to trust the data acquisition and transmission process and we know that there have been many problems there.
This issue-- making voting auditable and verifiable is not a minor consideration. Every single democratic primary candidate should be raising it-- they should all be raising it in unison at the debates they participate in. If it's not resolved by the time of the 2004 Presidential and congressional elections, there's a good chance george the liar Bush will steal his way back into a second term as president, and there's no telling how many more congressional and senatorial seats will be stolen, or gifted to crooked republicans.
The tens of millions of people who voted for Al Gore, who were outraged by the theft of the election, should all be contacting their national and state representatives, demanding that laws be passed to prevent any further shenanigans like what happened in Florida or Indiana (Senator Hagel won an election with a percentage way out of the polls' predictions, and he happened to be a major shareholder in the local company that managed the computerized elections and that refused to allow a re-count.) While it may be difficult to get a republican-run congress to pass bills that keep elections, it is also possible to pass laws at the state level. At least some states will be producing honest elections. There will soon be model legislation available for any state to model it's own laws after.
People who protested against the war should be getting out and protesting against corruption-at-risk voting systems. MoveOn.org and workingassets.com should get on this issue along with, of course, the democratic national committee.
Establishing a more honest, less vulnerable election process, in which people can trust that their votes really count, will help to bring more voters to the polls, will enable people to regain their faith in democracy. Failure to do so will spell ill for our nation. Patriotic Republicans who value the democratic process-- ie., the ones who haven't sold out to corporate and other special interests-- should treat honest election legislation as bipartisan.
"It's not the VOTING that's democracy, it's the counting." Tom Stoppard
Rob Kall rob@opednews.com is publisher of progressive news and opinion website www.opednews.com and organizer of cutting edge meetings that bring together world leaders, such as the Winter Brain Meeting and the StoryCon Summit Meeting on the Art, Science and Application of Story This article is copyright by Rob Kall, but permission is granted for reprint in print, email, blog, or web media so long as this entire credit paragraph is attached
Email this article to a friend
|
|
 | |
Don't forget to check out articles from 2007 and 2008National Issues
"Factory Farming Cattle for Profit Speeds the Evolution of Disease" December 28, 2003 Sarah Clark
"It's time to overrule the Supreme Court " December 23, 2003 Jeff Milchen
"Diebold email: 'Make vote printouts too costly for MD'" December 13, 2003 Eric A. Smith
"Is Bush a "Dry Drunk"? This is a Serious, Not Just a Provocative Question " November 19, 2003 Michael O'McCarthy
"To Hell and Back " November 19, 2003 Bob Zimmerman
"Coulter's Right-Wing Drag " October 29, 2003 Kellie Bean
"Senator Byrd, major media spread coverage of Bush-Nazi nexus" October 21, 2003 Harvey Wasserman & Bob Fitrakis
"George W. and Alcoholism " October 20, 2003 Michael O'McCarthy
"Emails Show Enron May Have Influenced FERC Probe On Calif Power Crisis, Refunds" October 13, 2003 Jason Leopold
"So Rush just wanted a “Rush”; Media accept Limbaugh spin on illegal drug buys and use without questions" October 12, 2003 James Boyne, OpEdNews.com
"George Bush, the Democrats, and Revisionist History" October 12, 2003 Gregory R. Weiher
"Schwarzenegger's First Role As Governor-Elect of California: The Deregulator" October 9, 2003 Jason Leopold
"Stay in Bed " October 8, 2003 Daniel Patrick Welch
"As Bush Implodes, 30 Ways Desperate Right Wingers Will Respond " October 8, 2003 Rob Kall
"Congressman John Conyers asks Karl Rove to resign" October 8, 2003 John Conyers
"Siege Heil: the Nazi Nexus*" October 6, 2003 Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman
"Loyal Opposition, Disloyal Regent " October 1, 2003 Daniel Patrick Welch
"Time to act" September 30, 2003 Paul Rogat Loeb
"National Missile Defense: Bad Science and Wasted Taxes" September 22, 2003 Jack Byrom
"Republicans Seem to Want to Keep Computerized Voting Easily Corruptible " September 10, 2003 Rob Kall
"How We Lost The Vote - How To Get It Back Again " September 10, 2003 Lynn Landes
"We Can Win the War in Vietnam and other chestnuts from a not-so-bygone era" September 5, 2003 Daniel Patrick Welch
"Lootocracy" September 2, 2003 Paul Loeb
"The Business of E-Voting and How it Can Put the Wrong Candidate in Officee" September 1, 2003 Jason Leopold
"After the Governor Sells Out On Requiring Electric and Hydrogen Cars in CA The Air Resources Board Reclassifies Gasoline Cars as "Clean"" August 29, 2003 Paul Fenn
"The Ill-Begotten: Reflections of Unconstitutional Precedence " August 24, 2003 Philip J. Rappa
"Storm and Strife " August 24, 2003 Philip J. Rappa
"A New Psychiatric Diagnostic Category; Politician Syndrome; DSM-IV 333.333 " August 23, 2003 Pam Ladds, opednews.com
"Founding Father of Neocon Philosophy Leo Strauss and Jefferson's Impending Death" August 21, 2003 Dr. Gerry Lower, Keystone, South Dakota
"Faith-based drug wars: Bush recruits religious youth groups as ground troops" August 21, 2003 Bill Berkowitz, WorkingForChange
"Voting Machine Fiasco" August 20, 2003 Lynn Landes
"Blackouts Happen-California Power Crisis Should Have Been A Warning Sign To U.S. " August 20, 2003 Jason Leopold
"Who is Michigan's Empire Man? Big Ten University President Does Bush's Bidding" August 18, 2003 Brian McKenna
"Power Failure; Bush Disaster" August 15, 2003 Rob Kall
"Ahnuld, Ken Lay, George Bush, Dick Cheney and Gray Davis" August 15, 2003 Jason Leopold
"Our President is a Criminal" July 28, 2003 Daniel Patrick Welch
"Yo Democrats! Wake Up!" June 2, 2003 Jason Leopold
Related Journal articles:
"Lighten up liberals! Michael Moore advises" December 2, 2003
"A message from Leonard Peltier" December 2, 2003
"'Democracy brief' calls on courts to eliminate corporate 'personhood' and bill of rights protection" December 2, 2003
"Kids should get Big Bird, not Big Mac" December 2, 2003
"The Immigrant Workers Freedom Ride" September 21, 2003
"A question almost unthinkable" September 20, 2003
Read Articles by Year: 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000

All content © 1970-2008 The Columbus Free Press Disclaimer |