DEPARTMENTS
ANTI-WAR
DEATH PENALTY
ELECTIONS
ENVIRONMENT
GLBT ISSUES
HEMP
INTERNATIONAL
NATIONAL
REVIEWS
|
Departments National Issues When Good Men Don't Do Nothing When the SJC's Goodridge decision demanded that same sex couples be allowed to marry, local lawmakers could have done a number of things. They could have jumped for joy, knowing that they would witness the inevitable triumph of the power of love and progress over ignorance and bigotry-all without having to lift a finger or spend any precious political capital. No heroics, no "promoting the gay agenda," whatever the hell that means. Just the slow wheels of Justice grinding their inexorable, logical, inevitable way through history, adapting to the obvious reality that if civil marriage is a state function and not a religious sacrament, then biblical concepts of coupledom have no place in the debate. Instead, the august body went ahead and did something. And boy, did they ever. Scared to death that Massachusetts might actually light a beacon of progress by being the first state in the Union to recognize same-sex marriage, they decided they would rather be known for a different first. Our beloved Commonwealth just took away a right which the Supreme Judicial Court just told us was constitutionally protected-in fact, it was precisely because of having been told it was protected This bears repeating: all the claptrap about "legalizing gay marriage" is, quite deliberately, I think, putting the cart before the horse. The courts are increasingly waking up to the realization that same sex marriage is legal, that the structure of the law cannot survive the hypocrisy of continuing to exclude one group from legal protections offered to others. So in response, the religious right, along with its craven allies in both parties, is trying to turn back this clock, to put the genie back in the bottle-or the closet, as it were. All the arguments, from "tradition" (where is Tevye when we need him most?) to "the right to vote" are nothing but smokescreens to hide this grim reality: gaybashers helped along by what one former Massachusetts Governor once referred to as "gutless wonders." I have not seen a single argument against same-sex marriage that I did not consider either craven, cynically expedient, or flat out bigoted. With one exception: Alexander Cockburn calls the gay marriage hoopla a "sidestep on the road to freedom," basically by saying that since the institution itself is a bourgeois sham, it does not further human progress by shackling yet another demographic in its tentacles. While I adore Cockburn's writings, I could not, as a straight man who chose to get married (and could), sincerely argue against another's wanting to do so. In fact, the two experiences are more related than it might seem. It is with some irony, and a heavy heart, that my wife and I celebrate our own seventh anniversary as the dust settles on the creepy Constitutional Convention. Half a century ago, our own marriage would not have been legal. The SJC referred to this historical analogy in its Goodridge decision, saying, in effect, that it was no more logical to restrict marriage rights on the basis of gender than it had been earlier to do so on the basis of race. I'm sure there are still counties where a majority might still be "uncomfortable" with our union-but of course, the law requires them to stuff it. Basically, who cares what the majority thinks? When minority rights are subject to nullification by the vote of the majority, democracy has begun to devour itself. But it is just this aspect of the whole episode that is the most chilling, and the one which has the least to do with the content of any amendment. The money and the power of the Church has certainly played a shameful and inordinate role in this charade; but it is not the fire and brimstone of the right which made the difference. The final vote of this round passed by only four votes: those of the leadershipâ€?Democratsâ€?.liberals. Not all, of course, put their consciences in blind trust. Ted Speliotis, of a district adjacent to mine, had this common sense observation: "Two people love each other. They want to get married. Who the hell am I to tell them they can't get married? You have no business being a state Rep. if you can't stand up for this decision." Indeed. And yet, many Democrats, liberals among them, will try to mischaracterize this as a victory. There is absolutely nothing positive about slowing the path of progress with a permanent, constitutional ban on same sex marriage. Unless, of course, one were to point out that it was positively reactionary...positively spineless. Gay marriage is now legal in Massachusetts, and my prediction is that it may never be illegal again. The ban has several hurdles yet-not the least of which is being ratified again by the same body after a new set of elections, thousands of happy, legal couples, and the slowly dawning realization that one group's attaining rights doesn't diminish those of another. The Framers, it seems, were wise enough to know that weaseling politicians couldn't be trusted not to cave in to baser instincts. All this, sad to say, will be accomplished without the help-and largely against the active opposition-of party "leaders." Serves them right. They think they have dodged a bullet, when in reality they have missed an opportunity. They really think they will lose zillions of votes by taking credit for the slow expansion of civil rights. So be it. Their calculus has always been curiously lacking as to how many they would lose by not having a backbone. They can't avoid being slammed as the Queer Party: hate crimes legislation, anti-bias statues, not to mention that almost all elected gays seem to be Democrats. They still have a shot, however, at picking up another mantle: the party that turns its back on a loyal part of its own base. For that alone, they deserve the losses they will reap. Craven or bigoted isn't much of a choice to offer people. Edmund Burke must be rolling over in his grave: sometimes, it seems, the only thing necessary to prevent the triumph of good is for weak men to refuse to just shut up and sit down. © 2004 Daniel Patrick Welch. Reprint permission granted with credit and link to danielpwelch.com. Writer, singer, linguist and activist Daniel Patrick Welch lives and writes in Salem, Massachusetts, with his wife, Julia Nambalirwa-Lugudde. Together they run The Greenhouse School. His website is at danielpwelch.com. |
|
Recent National Issues Articles Stay granted pending appeal Divided we stand: The cleaving of America The Right, the Cross and the CIA: Immaculate Deception Degrees of Separation: Mass Murder Style Hispanic vote for GOP does not reflect long-term shift Gonzales is poor choice for U.S. Attorney General Tavis Smiley’s exit from NPR will be great loss for radio Basket brawl recreates gladiator-spectator relationship HRC releases World AIDS Day report card The Impossible Will Take a Little While: Hope in a Time of Fear Attorney jailed, released pending appeal on privilege issue Subordinating nation's secular values to zealots' will Sorry, No Foreign-Born Presidents Flight Attendants, the Working Day and Labor Solidarity Attorney refuses to testify, jailed Where Is Our National Conscience? Beam me Up Scotty… Under Cheney, Halliburton Helped Saddam Hussein Siphon Billions from UN Oil-for-Food Program Disinformation and Depleted Uranium The History of the CIA and the American Elections Coup Unnoticed 1st Amendment Abuses How Dick Cheney Got Away With $35 Million Right Before the Govt Launched a Probe into Halliburton The Results of Ten Years of Prosecution of Corporate Crimes Greens cite reasons for a new, independent 9/11 probe Empty Platform, Empty Town Ralph Nader Sleeping with the Enemy? Let's Be Fair Missing Government Documents- Berger and Bush ADC Update: Contact ADC if Approached by the FBI The isolation of Indiana, USA The Convention Speech A Child Longs To Hear Waging War with Wal-Mart Good for Business, Bad for the People Condi Rice salutes war president, It's not who you think Did Ashcroft 'behead' an innocent man in an Ohio election-terror scam? Ohio Muslims react to arrest of terror suspect New documents suggest Enron’s Lay, Skilling, Washington lobbyist knew about company’s trading schemes in California Ronald Reagan's Hip-Hop Legacy Impeach the SOB, Damn the Republicans-Full Speed Ahead! Labor Media May Be Our Best Hope Against the Corporate Version Energy advisors helped fund governor's campaign Schwarzenegger Pulls a Cheney; Aides Refuse to Identify People Who Helped Governor Draft Calif. Energy Plan Got Juice? California May Be Saddled With Severe Power Shortages This Summer Bush Was Warned of Possible Attack in U.S., Official Says Faking Democracy - Americans Don't Vote, Machines Do, & Ballot Printers Can't Fix That When Good Men Don't Do Nothing 9/11: It worked, didn't it? One quarter of every tax dollar you pay! $7 Trillion national debt driving interest expense to record highs The strange collapse of building seven Read National Issues Articles by Year: |
FREE PRESS EMAIL UPDATE
Donate to the Free Press Election Protection Fund to help us investigate and monitor election fraud in this year's election.
FOLLOW US ON
twitter
facebook
SEARCH THE FREEPRESS
1021 E. Broad St. Columbus, OH 43205 | 614.253.2571 | truth@freepress.org
All content © 1970-2012 The Columbus Free Press
Disclaimer