DEPARTMENTS
ANTI-WAR
DEATH PENALTY
ELECTIONS
ENVIRONMENT
GLBT ISSUES
HEMP
INTERNATIONAL
NATIONAL
REVIEWS
|
Departments National Issues Under Cheney, Halliburton Helped Saddam Hussein Siphon Billions from UN Oil-for-Food Program The report on Iraq's non-existent weapons of mass destruction, prepared by Charles Duelfer, a former U.N. weapons inspector and head of the Iraqi Survey Group, said Saddam Hussein used revenue from the oil-for-food program and "created a web of front companies and used shadowy deals with foreign governments, corporations, and officials to amass $11 billion in illicit revenue "Through secret government-to-government trade agreements, Saddam Hussein's government earned more than $7.5 billion," the report says. "At the same time, by demanding kickbacks from foreign companies that received oil or that supplied consumer goods, Iraq received at least $2 billion more to spend on weapons or on Saddam's extravagant palaces." The oil-for-food program was supervised by the U.N. and ran from 1996 until the war started in Iraq last year. It was designed to alleviate the effects sanctions had on Iraqi citizens by allowing limited quantities of oil to be sold to buy food and medicine. But the one company that helped Saddam exploit the oil-for-food program in the mid-1990s that wasn't identified in Duelfer's report was Halliburton, and the person at the helm of Halliburton at the time of the scheme was Vice President Dick Cheney. Halliburton and its subsidiaries were one of several American and foreign oil supply companies that helped Iraq increase its crude exports from $4 billion in 1997 to nearly $18 billion in 2000 by skirting U.S. laws and selling Iraq spare parts so it could repair its oil fields and pump more oil. Since the oil-for-food program began, Iraq has sold $40 billion worth of oil. U.S. and European officials have long argued that the increase in Iraq's oil production also expanded Saddam's ability to use some of that money for weapons, luxury goods and palaces. Security Council diplomats estimate that Iraq was skimming off as much as 10 percent of the proceeds from the oil-for-food program thanks to companies like Halliburton and former executives such as Cheney. U.N. documents show that Halliburton's affiliates have had controversial dealings with the Iraqi regime during Cheney's tenure at the company and played a part in helping Saddam Hussein illegally pocket billions of dollars under the U.N.'s oil-for-food program. The Clinton administration blocked one deal Halliburton was trying to push through sale because it was "not authorized under the oil-for-food deal," according to U.N. documents. That deal, between Halliburton subsidiary Ingersoll Dresser Pump Co. and Iraq, included agreements by the firm to sell nearly $1 million in spare parts, compressors and firefighting equipment to refurbish an offshore oil terminal, Khor al Amaya. Still, Halliburton used one of foreign subsidiaries to sell Iraq the equipment it needed so the country could pump more oil, according to a report in the Washington Post in June 2001. The Halliburton subsidiaries, Dresser-Rand and Ingersoll Dresser Pump Co., sold water and sewage treatment pumps, spare parts for oil facilities and pipeline equipment to Baghdad through French affiliates from the first half of 1997 to the summer of 2000, U.N. records show. Ingersoll Dresser Pump also signed contracts -- later blocked by the United States -- according to the Post, to help repair an Iraqi oil terminal that U.S.-led military forces destroyed in the Gulf War years earlier. Cheney's hard-line stance against Iraq on the campaign trail is hypocritical considering that during his tenure as chief executive of Halliburton, Cheney pushed the U.N. Security Council, after he became CEO to end an 11-year embargo on sales of civilian goods, including oil related equipment, to Iraq. Cheney has said sanctions against countries like Iraq unfairly punish U.S. companies. During the 2000 presidential campaign, Cheney adamantly denied that under his leadership, Halliburton did business with Iraq. While he acknowledged that his company did business with Libya and Iran through foreign subsidiaries, Cheney said, "Iraq's different." He claimed that he imposed a "firm policy" prohibiting any unit of Halliburton against trading with Iraq. "I had a firm policy that we wouldn't do anything in Iraq, even arrangements that were supposedly legal," Cheney said on the ABC-TV news program "This Week" on July 30, 2000. "We've not done any business in Iraq since U.N. sanctions were imposed on Iraq in 1990, and I had a standing policy that I wouldn't do that." But Cheney's denials don't hold up. Halliburton played a major role in helping Iraq repair its oil fields during the mid-1990s that allowed Saddam to siphon off funds from the oil-for-food program to fund a weapons program, which Cheney and President Bush insist was the case. As secretary of defense in the first Bush administration, Cheney helped to lead a multinational coalition against Iraq in the Persian Gulf War and to devise a comprehensive economic embargo to isolate Saddam Hussein's government. After Cheney was named chief executive of Halliburton in 1995, he promised to maintain a hard line against Baghdad. But that changed when it appeared that Halliburton was headed for a financial crisis in the mid-1990s. Cheney said sanctions against countries like Iraq were hurting corporations such as Halliburton. "We seem to be sanction-happy as a government," Cheney said at an energy conference in April 1996, reported in the oil industry publication Petroleum Finance Week. "The problem is that the good Lord didn't see fit to always put oil and gas resources where there are democratic governments," he observed during his conference presentation. Sanctions make U.S. businesses "the bystander who gets hit when a train wreck occurs," Cheney told Petroleum Finance Week. "While virtually every other country sees the need for sanctions against Iraq and Saddam Hussein's regime there, Cheney sees general agreement that the measures have not been very effective despite their having most of the international community's support. An individual country's embargo, such as that of the United States against Iran, has virtually no effect since the target country simply signs a contract with a non- U.S. business," the publication reported. |
|
Recent National Issues Articles Stay granted pending appeal Divided we stand: The cleaving of America The Right, the Cross and the CIA: Immaculate Deception Degrees of Separation: Mass Murder Style Hispanic vote for GOP does not reflect long-term shift Gonzales is poor choice for U.S. Attorney General Tavis Smiley’s exit from NPR will be great loss for radio Basket brawl recreates gladiator-spectator relationship HRC releases World AIDS Day report card The Impossible Will Take a Little While: Hope in a Time of Fear Attorney jailed, released pending appeal on privilege issue Subordinating nation's secular values to zealots' will Sorry, No Foreign-Born Presidents Flight Attendants, the Working Day and Labor Solidarity Attorney refuses to testify, jailed Where Is Our National Conscience? Beam me Up Scotty… Under Cheney, Halliburton Helped Saddam Hussein Siphon Billions from UN Oil-for-Food Program Disinformation and Depleted Uranium The History of the CIA and the American Elections Coup Unnoticed 1st Amendment Abuses How Dick Cheney Got Away With $35 Million Right Before the Govt Launched a Probe into Halliburton The Results of Ten Years of Prosecution of Corporate Crimes Greens cite reasons for a new, independent 9/11 probe Empty Platform, Empty Town Ralph Nader Sleeping with the Enemy? Let's Be Fair Missing Government Documents- Berger and Bush ADC Update: Contact ADC if Approached by the FBI The isolation of Indiana, USA The Convention Speech A Child Longs To Hear Waging War with Wal-Mart Good for Business, Bad for the People Condi Rice salutes war president, It's not who you think Did Ashcroft 'behead' an innocent man in an Ohio election-terror scam? Ohio Muslims react to arrest of terror suspect New documents suggest Enron’s Lay, Skilling, Washington lobbyist knew about company’s trading schemes in California Ronald Reagan's Hip-Hop Legacy Impeach the SOB, Damn the Republicans-Full Speed Ahead! Labor Media May Be Our Best Hope Against the Corporate Version Energy advisors helped fund governor's campaign Schwarzenegger Pulls a Cheney; Aides Refuse to Identify People Who Helped Governor Draft Calif. Energy Plan Got Juice? California May Be Saddled With Severe Power Shortages This Summer Bush Was Warned of Possible Attack in U.S., Official Says Faking Democracy - Americans Don't Vote, Machines Do, & Ballot Printers Can't Fix That When Good Men Don't Do Nothing 9/11: It worked, didn't it? One quarter of every tax dollar you pay! $7 Trillion national debt driving interest expense to record highs The strange collapse of building seven Read National Issues Articles by Year: |
FREE PRESS EMAIL UPDATE
Donate to the Free Press Election Protection Fund to help us investigate and monitor election fraud in this year's election.
FOLLOW US ON
twitter
facebook
SEARCH THE FREEPRESS
1021 E. Broad St. Columbus, OH 43205 | 614.253.2571 | truth@freepress.org
All content © 1970-2012 The Columbus Free Press
Disclaimer