Fri Feb 10 2012

A Campaign Proposal for Progressives* Two Ways to Pay As You Go
by David Swanson
July 8, 2009

The day after ramming through nearly $100 billion more for wars and $100 billion in loans to European banks through the IMF, the majority leader in the U.S. House of Representatives, Steny Hoyer, introduced a "PayGo" bill, requiring that any spending be paid for with cuts in other spending. But having this law on the books would not have stopped the previous day's legislation. War "supplemental" bills are deemed "emergencies" and an exception is made for them. And lending money you don't have and can't be sure of getting back, through an unaccountable organization with a record of damaging those it claims to help, is not considered spending at all.

Robert Borosage argues for opposing PayGo on the grounds that deficit spending may be needed in the short term. He also argues that the only place where spending is out of control is healthcare and that this broad legislation would take the focus off healthcare and block necessary spending elsewhere. He also claims that PayGo is a project of the rightwing Blue Dog Democrats that progressives oppose. And Borosage rightly calls out Blue Dogs on their hypocrisy in always voting for wars while chattering about fiscal discipline. So, that's one approach: oppose PayGo and try to stop it.

But let's get our facts straight. Hoyer's bill has 163 cosponsors, most of them not Blue Dogs, a lot of them progressives, or at least what passes for progressives in Congress. PayGo also has the support of President Barack Obama. Healthcare is decidedly not the only place where spending is out of control. I agree with Borosage's emphasis on healthcare, but not with his fierce opposition to single-payer, which is the only thing that can fix it. If we avoid single-payer, and therefore the compromises that advocating it could facilitate, we are likely to end up with a healthcare "solution" that does involve a lot of wasteful spending -- in which case you wouldn't want PayGo to be on the books, unless you saw opposition to wasteful spending as a legitimate concern in itself. And I do. But the biggest chunk of wasteful spending every year is not on healthcare or any other human good. And it's not on war supplementals. It's on the standard military budget. We don't need deficit spending. We need to move at least a fraction of the wasteful money in the bloated pigged-out Pentagon to programs that serve useful purposes. This is a progressive and a majority position.

But the exceptions for wars and loans are serious exceptions. They could both be addressed through amendments to the PayGo legislation. I want to focus on the war supplementals, because I think they offer an opening for engagement that would leave Borosage and all progressives and a much larger section of the political spectrum happy. My idea is this: we launch a campaign to amend the PayGo legislation to stipulate that no funding for any war that has been ongoing for over five years counts as an "emergency" or is excluded from PayGo requirements. This would mean that the next war supplemental bill could not be passed without some explanation of where the money was going to come from. (Congressman John Murtha has promised another supplemental this year, having waited to do so until just after the passage of the last one, which was sold as being the final such bill.) Such a campaign could simply target Hoyer to amend his bill to agree that wars that have been dragging on for over five years are not emergencies. Or it could work with Congressional supporters to gather support for an amendment to that effect or a sign-on letter committing members to reject PayGo unless that change is made.

What would such a campaign produce? For certain it would call out all the hypocrites in a very visible way. All of those Republicans and Blue Dogs and everybody else who votes for war money, and does so extra-irresponsibly off-the-books, would have to put up or shut up about fiscal responsibility. Every time they opened their mouths about fiscal responsibility they could be asked whether they thought wars over five years were emergencies. Every time they said we should pay as we go they could be asked if we should pay as we kill as well. Such a campaign would generate opposition to PayGo and allow Congress Members to oppose it as hypocritical and pro-war waste. And such members need not commit to supporting PayGo if it is amended to include war supplementals. They could still choose to oppose it.

But what if the amendment were made? What if members had committed to supporting PayGo? It would then be a PayGo that, in the minds of everyone, was about the military as well as human needs. We would then have put on the table the question of Pentagon waste, while requiring fiscal discipline -- which, yes, is a good thing. This is the question progressives should consider: do we want money for human needs to be borrowed from our grandchildren or taken away from the war machine? That shouldn't be a difficult choice.

Recent National Issues Articles

McCain could have meant Less War
December 31, 2009
David Swanson

Healthcare mandate vs. the Constitution
December 24, 2009
David Swanson

A healthy economy
December 24, 2009
Robert C. Koehler

Apostle of our inner genius
December 17, 2009
Robert C. Koehler

Wars or jobs: decide now
December 14, 2009
David Swanson

Are Americans Too Broken for the Truth to Set Us Free?
December 13, 2009
Bruce E. Levine

The school-to-prison pipeline
December 11, 2009
Robert C. Koehler

Kucinich circulating privileged resolutions to end wars in Afghanistan and Pakistan
December 10, 2009
David Swanson

National security state still killing John F Kennedy
December 7, 2009
Pete Johnson

Richard Viguerie calls GOP litmus tests "Well intentioned," but urges replacement of Republican establishment leaders
December 3, 2009
Bob Sturm

Craziest Obavietghanistan speech moments
December 2, 2009
David Swanson

New civil resistance coalition formed to end the war
December 1, 2009
Cindy Sheehan

Anti-Americans
November 24, 2009
Christopher Bifani

Why can't we do to DC what we did to Seattle?
November 19, 2009
David Swanson

They should get a union
November 17, 2009
David Swanson

KSM and MSM
November 17, 2009
David Swanson

The two percent robustness
November 15, 2009
David Swanson

Between hate speech and adoration
November 15, 2009
David Swanson

Pelosi arrested us for asking for healthcare
November 15, 2009
Dan Hodges, Chair, Health Care for All-California

Over 2,200 veterans died in 2008 due to lack of health insurance
November 15, 2009
Physicians for a National Health Program

Isolated incident
November 15, 2009
Robert C. Koehler

Come together right now
November 15, 2009
David Swanson

Joel Peresman of the Rock Hall Foundation says the time has come today
November 4, 2009
Harvey Wasserman

Between hate speech and adoration
November 2, 2009
David Swanson

Preview of Ramzy Baroud's 'My Father was a Freedom Fighter'
October 29, 2009
Stephen Lendman

Why I am risking arrest for Medicare for all
October 29, 2009
Margaret Flowers, M.D., Congressional Fellow, Physicians for a National Health Program

Single-eye vision
October 29, 2009
Robert C. Koehler

Did Obama/McCain choice matter?
October 28, 2009
David Swanson

No one else will stop the killing -- Veteran's group to members: Multiply resistance by any peaceful means available
October 27, 2009
Mike Ferner

Accepting the prize
October 26, 2009
Robert C. Koehler

Glen Ford speaks in Columbus
October 26, 2009
Free Press

Heavy Traffic
October 23, 2009
Terence Robertson

Who SHOULD Decide About War?
October 14, 2009
By David Swanson

Starting Another Year of War in Afghanistan
October 14, 2009
Norman Solomon

Congress must pass single-payer health care now!
September 30, 2009
Cynthia McKinney

U.S. Drug War Priorities in Need of Re-Evaluation
September 16, 2009
Mary Jane Borden

Senator Kennedy visits then Cleveland City Councilman
August 26, 2009
Representative Dennis Kucinich

Govt-funded reporter urged lynching of Black Congresswoman
August 24, 2009
David Swanson