Departments
New nukes in Idaho = more cancer
by Joseph Mangano
December 13, 2006
The Idaho Power Company recently submitted a plan to state utility commissioners, a proposed blueprint for how energy would be generated for the state’s growing population. Over the next 20 years, new energy sources would be created – including a new nuclear power plant. This would be the first such plant in Idaho – but not the state’s first encounter with nuclear power.
- The Idaho National Laboratory just west of Idaho Falls, ran for over four decades. A large amount of highly radioactive waste exists at the site, and cleanup by the U.S. Energy Department is underway.
- The Hanford site in southeastern Washington is just over 100 miles west (upwind) of northern Idaho. Hanford released enormous amounts of radioactivity into the air, especially in the early years of the Cold War.
- Fallout from Nevada atomic bomb tests drifted over the nation, and precipitation brought it into the food chain. The National Cancer Institute found that of the five U.S. counties with the highest exposures, four were in Idaho (Blaine, Custer, Gem, Lemhi).
Nuclear power reactors create electricity, not bombs. But in doing so, they produce the same cocktail of radioactive chemicals found in nuclear weapons. Much of it is stored as waste – making nuclear plants an inviting target for terrorists. But some of it is released into the air and water, and enters human bodies through breathing, eating, and drinking. These chemicals include Cesium-137, which disperses in soft tissues; Iodine-131, which attacks the thyroid gland; and Strontium-90, which seeks out bone. Each of these chemicals damages cells, and is especially harmful to infants and children.
Idaho has traditionally been a state with low cancer rates. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention web site ranks it 31st of 39 states in cancer incidence for 2001-02, the most recent years available. The cancer death rate is the lowest in the nation, except for Hawaii, New Mexico, and Utah.
But Idaho’s incidence rate for certain radiation-sensitive cancers is high. Out of 39 states listed on the CDC web site for 2001-02, Idaho ranks 2nd in childhood cancer (age 0-19), 8th in thyroid cancer, 5th in leukemia, 6th in multiple myeloma, 4th in Hodgkin’s disease, 2nd in brain/nervous system cancer, and 10th in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma
Thyroid cancer is especially sensitive to radioactive iodine. Bone-seekers such as strontium enter the bone marrow, where they can cause cancers of the blood forming organs such as leukemia, myeloma, Hodgkin’s disease, and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. While these diseases are much less common than lung, breast, colon, or prostate cancer, they still are diagnosed in over 800 Idaho residents each year – a number that is growing.
Determining whether past radiation exposures have caused these cancers requires more detailed studies. Until this link is better understood, it would be prudent not to introduce nuclear reactors to Idaho quite yet – especially since non-polluting sources of electricity such as solar and wind power are available. Thus, Idaho citizens (who have until January 22 to make comments to the state Public Utilities Commission) should take the nuclear cancer threat seriously, and ask the Commission to consider public health before endorsing more nuclear power.
Joseph Mangano MPH MBA is National Coordinator of the Radiation and Public Health Project, a research organization based in New York.
ATTACHMENT
Cancer statistics from http://wonder.cdc.gov, National Program of Cancer Registries. For example, states with highest and lowest rates of all cancers age 0-19, 2001-2002, adjusted to the 2000 U.S. standard population, are (rates and number of cases)
| HIGHEST | LOWEST |
| Vermont | 21.02 | (69) | North Dakota | 10.43 | (18) |
| Idaho | 19.69 | (165) | Alabama | 13.23 | (329) |
| Maine | 19.19 | (127) | N. Carolina | 13.62 | (616) |
| Rhode Island | 18.27 | (99) | Louisiana | 14.18 | (382) |
| Minnesota | 18.17 | (515) | S. Carolina | 14.25 | (323) |
U.S. total is 16.36 (22,868). Does not include CT, HI, IA, KS, MD, MS, NM, SD, TN, UT, VA, WY, or any territories. Other cancers may be selected using web site.
|
 |
Recent Environment Articles
New nukes in Idaho = more cancer December 13, 2006 Joseph Mangano
Wal-Mart Charged with Selling Nonorganic Food as Organic November 14, 2006 Mark A. Kastel
USDA undermines organic law, authority of expert panel ignored August 23, 2006 Cornucopia Institute
Nation's largest organic milk marketer "deceiving consumers," legal complaint filed by the Cornucopia Institute August 13, 2006 Cornucopia Institute
An inconvenient video game July 16, 2006 Paul Rogat Loeb
Global warming, local hope June 9, 2006 Paul Rogat Loeb
Time for real action on oil dependence June 2, 2006 Mike Shriberg, Ph.D.
Al Gore and global warming: Both are an "Inconvenient Truth" only if you're a Repuglican May 25, 2006 The Ostroy Report
Beyond bashing Bush: Grassroots environmentalism and the prospect for a populist resurgence May 7, 2006 Daniel Patrick Welch
Great Lakes for sale! Michigan's Odawa Indians lead anti-Nestle fight April 22, 2006 Brian McKenna
Cornucopia Institute seeks records on lack of organic food standards enforcement April 14, 2006 Mark A. Kastel
GOP bids to take ANWR while region was ravaged by major oil spill March 18, 2006 Jason Leopold
Lawsuit calls genetically engineered alfalfa a risk to farmers and the environment February 19, 2006 The Cornucopia Institute
Read Environment Articles by Year: 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 |