DEPARTMENTS
ANTI-WAR
DEATH PENALTY
ELECTIONS
ENVIRONMENT
GLBT ISSUES
HEMP
INTERNATIONAL
NATIONAL
REVIEWS
|
Departments Environment Ohio Environmental Council’s Comments on U.S. Department of Energy’s Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for the Global Nuclear Energy Partnership In response to the DOE’s request for comments on the proposed scope, alternatives and environmental issues to be analyzed by GNEP PEIS, OEC respectfully submits the comments below. OEC requests the DOE take these issues into consideration, and address these questions before moving forward on the GNEP program. Environmental Issues and other Questions/ Concerns that DOE Must Address 1. Water quality impacts • With potentially thousands of tons of spent nuclear fuel being shipped to and housed at the proposed facility, the potential for jeopardizing the health of important recreational watercourses and drinking water sources are great. The proposed GNEP facility in Piketon sits atop the Teays Aquifer and is adjacent to streams and creeks that lead to the Scioto River. • USGS hydrological studies of the site concluded that failure to contain radioactive material would jeopardize these water resources. • If long term storage is an option for this facility, what are the long-term impacts of housing large quantities of SNF near surface and groundwater drinking and recreation sources? 2. Impacts to flora and fauna of the region • It is not only the human health and safety that should be a concern. Southern Ohio is the home to a unique collection of plants, some only native to that portion of the state. This region is also home to a number of state and federally recognized threatened and endangered species. 3. Air Quality • What are the air emissions from this proposed facility, and what will the impact be on the surrounding community? • Southern Ohio experiences already poor air quality from decades of pulverized coal power plant emissions. While nuclear power plants produce little if any sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide, and carbon dioxide compared to fossil fuel burning plants, uranium enrichment process, recycling, as well as the transport of the uranium fuel to the nuclear plant can produce these emissions. • What will be the cumulative human and environmental health impacts of the facility vis-à-vis air emissions and air quality when the air quality impacts of the nearby coal power plants and other land uses are taken into consideration? 4. Socioeconomic concerns • This is one of Ohio’s poorest regions, the need for jobs is important, but at what cost? The economic benefits of such a project cannot be seen without a safe, healthy and viable work force. How will DOE secure the safety of its workers and the workers families? What could be the impacts to the workers and the surrounding community if there is a radiological release? • The DOE must address the economic justice issues inherent in this proposed facility, specifically the disproportionate impact on low-income citizens. • The DOE should consider whether cleanup and reclamation of the facility for other uses may be more beneficial to the surrounding community. 5. Private Ownership of Nuclear “Recycling Facility” • If the Piketon facility is allowed to be owned and operated by private companies, will there be, and to what degree will there be, federal government oversight? 6. Does the technology exist? • Scientists from the Federation of American Scientists and other organizations have analyzed the GNEP program and concluded the necessary technologies do not exist and are not close to development. We have serious concerns with the process of “recycling” nuclear fuel; a process that is still in the research and development stages. The United States cannot afford to base our energy needs on untested and unperfected technology that carries with it the risk for great environmental and human health impacts. This is definitely the case when one looks to the advances in cleaner coal technology, wind, solar, and biomass technology that create energy as well as reduce harmful emissions. 7. Storage • Is this a short-term storage facility or a long term depository which the citizens of Southern Ohio will be forced to bear the human and environmental risks for an indeterminate time? • The GNEP proposal calls for storage of spent nuclear fuel to be housed at the GNEP facilities until the Yucca Mountain repository is ready. However, decade long delays with securing that facility and staunch opposition to the utilization of Yucca Mountain have made the reality of a safe depository moot. • Have the obvious and perhaps devastating homeland security issues been fully and adequately addressed? o If the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant Facility is chosen as the GNEP recycling facility, for example, SNF would be received from commercial nuclear reactors and would be processed at that central location. Terrorists, from both within and without this country would know the route and final destination of massive quantities of highly reactive nuclear waste, making the GNEP facility a major target for disaster. o Along the same lines, unforeseen acts of nature on or near the facility could cause disastrous health and environmental consequences with the great amount of nuclear fuel and waste housed in that central locale. 8. Transportation of Spent Nuclear Waste • With the amount of SNF proposed to be trucked into the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant in Piketon, Ohio from nuclear facilities in the western United States (and/or around the world) for recycling and storage, how does DOE plan to protect those along the travel route? • DOE will need to consider the amount of traffic, both in construction of the facility and transportation of the importation of SNF, on the infrastructure of the village of Piketon and Pike County. Outdated and ill-prepared county and township infrastructure (i.e. roads and bridges) could create financial problems for the local government and above all create unsafe conditions for the community. |
|
Nation’s largest retailers accused of organic fraud Stop the Nuke Loan Bailout!: Harvey Wasserman with Amy Goodman on Democracy Now! 3 reasons to stop the nuclear power bailout Eight European governments. say nuclear power is incompatible with sustainable development Bad week for Bush on climate, but what now? Aurora Dairy threatens to sue public interest groups, attempt to intimidate organic watchdogs Secret USDA enforcement action revealed Aurora Farm’s certifier found to have willfully violated NOP rules USDA finds largest organic dairy perpetrating fraud fails to levy fines or yank certification Enforcement hammer falls on nation’s largest organic factory dairy Aurora Organic Dairy signs consent agreement with USDA's agricultural marketing service C.L.E.A.N.- Community, Labor, Environmental Action Network Nuclear power: follow the money USDA cracking down on “organic” factory farms country's largest dairy likely to lose certification USDA plan to "Pasteurize" almonds has consumers going nuts Study: organic dairy and meat improves quality of mothers’ breast milk Speaking truth to power Ohio Environmental Council’s Comments on U.S. Department of Energy’s Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for the Global Nuclear Energy Partnership A live Earth - the alternative online concert against climate change Making history in Atlanta Organic animal agriculture threatened by genetically engineered alfalfa Regulators slap Wal-Mart for misleading organic consumers Federal court orders first-ever halt to planting of a commercialized genetically-altered crop Green beacon The future of Earth Climate: time is short “Rachel Carson turns in her grave," an open letter to Patricia M. DeMarco, Director, Rachel Carson Homestead Association Target global warming, target Exxon Solartopia! An achievable vision of a sustainable future Ten simple things that you can do to save the Earth USDA and agribusiness conspire to mislead consumers Good, clean, green way to generate electricity is approved by city in San Diego County Federal judge orders first-ever moratorium on sale of genetically-altered seed Piketown, Ohio Nuclear reprocessing: dangerous, dirty, and expensive U.S. nuclear fuel reprocessing initiative Organic watchdog, USDA headed to court Listen Gore: Some inconvenient truths about the politics of environmental crisis UN climate change report on global warming Organic fraud: Wal-Mart Stores Inc. accused of widespread distortion nonorganic food products misidentified as "organic" Read Environment Articles by Year: |
FREE PRESS EMAIL UPDATE
Donate to the Free Press Election Protection Fund to help us investigate and monitor election fraud in this year's election.
FOLLOW US ON
twitter
facebook
SEARCH THE FREEPRESS
1021 E. Broad St. Columbus, OH 43205 | 614.253.2571 | truth@freepress.org
All content © 1970-2012 The Columbus Free Press
Disclaimer