The unfolding multiple nuclear reactor catastrophe in Japan is prompting overdue attention to the 104 nuclear plants in the United States - many of them aging, many of them near earthquake faults, some on the west coast exposed to potential tsunamis.
by Ralph Nader, Reader Supported News
March 20, 2011
Nuclear power plants boil water to produce steam to turn turbines that generate electricity. Nuclear power's overly complex fuel cycle begins with uranium mines and ends with deadly radioactive wastes for which there still are no permanent storage facilities to contain them for tens of thousands of years.
Atomic power plants generate 20 percent of the nation's electricity. Over forty years ago, the industry's promoter and regulator, the Atomic Energy Commission estimated that a full nuclear meltdown could contaminate an area "the size of Pennsylvania" and cause massive casualties. You, the taxpayers, have heavily subsidized nuclear power research, development, and promotion from day one with tens of billions of dollars.
Because of many costs, perils, close calls at various reactors, and the partial meltdown at the Three Mile Island plant in Pennsylvania in 1979, there has not been a nuclear power plant built in the United States since 1974.
Now the industry is coming back "on your back" claiming it will help reduce global warming from fossil fuel emitted greenhouse gases.
Pushed aggressively by President Obama and Energy Secretary Chu, who refuses to meet with longtime nuclear industry critics, here is what "on your back" means:
1. Wall Street will not finance new nuclear plants without a 100% taxpayer loan guarantee. Too risky. That's a lot of guarantee given that new nukes cost $12 billion each, assuming no mishaps. Obama and the Congress are OK with that arrangement.
2. Nuclear power is uninsurable in the private insurance market - too risky. Under the Price-Anderson Act, taxpayers pay the greatest cost of a meltdown's devastation.
3. Nuclear power plants and transports of radioactive wastes are a national security nightmare for the Department of Homeland Security. Imagine the target that thousands of vulnerable spent fuel rods present for sabotage.
4. Guess who pays for whatever final waste repositories are licensed? You the taxpayer and your descendants as far as your gene line persists. Huge decommissioning costs, at the end of a nuclear plant's existence come from the ratepayers' pockets.
5. Nuclear plant disasters present impossible evacuation burdens for those living anywhere near a plant, especially if time is short.
Imagine evacuating the long-troubled Indian Point plants 26 miles north of New York City. Workers in that region have a hard enough time evacuating their places of employment during 5 pm rush hour. That's one reason Secretary of State Clinton (in her time as Senator of New York) and Governor Andrew Cuomo called for the shutdown of Indian Point.
6. Nuclear power is both uneconomical and unnecessary. It can't compete against energy conservation, including cogeneration, windpower and ever more efficient, quicker, safer, renewable forms of providing electricity. Amory Lovins argues this point convincingly (see RMI.org). Physicist Lovins asserts that nuclear power "will reduce and retard climate protection." His reasoning: shifting the tens of billions invested in nuclear power to efficiency and renewables reduce far more carbon per dollar (http://www.nirs.org/factsheets/whynewnukesareriskyfcts.pdf). The country should move deliberately to shutdown nuclear plants, starting with the aging and seismically threatened reactors. Peter Bradford, a former Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) commissioner has also made a compelling case against nuclear power on economic and safety grounds (Why Nukes are Risky).
There is far more for ratepayers, taxpayers and families near nuclear plants to find out. Here's how you can start:
1. Demand public hearings in your communities where there is a nuke, sponsored either by your member of Congress or the NRC, to put the facts, risks and evacuation plans on the table. Insist that the critics as well as the proponents testify and cross-examine each other in front of you and the media.
2. If you call yourself conservative, ask why nuclear power requires such huge amounts of your tax dollars and guarantees and can't buy adequate private insurance. If you have a small business that can't buy insurance because what you do is too risky, you don't stay in business.
3. If you are an environmentalist, ask why nuclear power isn't required to meet a cost-efficient market test against investments in energy conservation and renewables.
4. If you understand traffic congestion, ask for an actual real life evacuation drill for those living and working 10 miles around the plant (some scientists think it should be at least 25 miles) and watch the hemming and hawing from proponents of nuclear power.
The people in northern Japan may lose their land, homes, relatives, and friends as a result of a dangerous technology designed simply to boil water. There are better ways to generate steam.
Like the troubled Japanese nuclear plants, the Indian Point plants and the four plants at San Onofre and Diablo Canyon in southern California rest near earthquake faults. The seismologists concur that there is a 94% chance of a big earthquake in California within the next thirty years. Obama, Chu and the powerful nuke industry must not be allowed to force the American people to play Russian Roulette!
Recent Environment Articles
If you care about Keystone and climate change, occupy Exxon
December 29, 2011
Paul Rogat Loeb
Enforcement action at giant Arizona organic dairy factory farm
December 16, 2011
Mark Kastel, The Cornucopia Institute
Pigs, cows, and chickens are the 99 percent, says animal rights activist
December 15, 2011
Death of Richard Grossman
November 26, 2011
Donít Log Our Parks! Tell OSP and DOF to Halt Plans for Commercial Timber Harvests in Ohioís State Parks
November 22, 2011
Buckeye Forest Council
A fracking dilemma?
November 21, 2011
Bob Sheak, Athens, Ohio, Nov 21, 2011
Escape from Lady Baba-land:Getting the hell out of the Islamic Republic of BP with the Deepwater Horizon evidence
November 10, 2011
The Crack at Davis-Besse is just one more 'Nail in the Coffin', says Coalition
October 19, 2011
Fracking or no fracking in Athens
October 11, 2011
Have You Been To Jail For Justice ?
September 30, 2011
Local activist Chuck Lynd on techno-fixes, corporate power, and movement building
September 29, 2011
How can the mostly white middle class environmental movement engage w/ Black & low-income communities ?
September 19, 2011
Opponents of fracking deal with corporate and political obstacles
September 7, 2011
September 1, 2011
Robert C. Koehler
The 'green' thing....
August 8, 2011
The end of nuclear power: Can a weakened nuclear industry survive its deadly repeating history
July 4, 2011
Lucas Whitefield Hixson
Will Fukushima teach us anything after all? - Survivng nuclear disasters - Remembering the sacrifice of brave nuclear workers
June 19, 2011
Lucas Whitefield Hixson
Summer brings new problems affecting Japan and world: Will Fukushima cause international higher mortality rates?
June 8, 2011
Lucas Whitefield Hixson
Environmental challenges against proposed new Fermi 3 atomic reactor survive
May 23, 2011
Citizen groups win a victory in fight against Davis-Besse atomic reactor extension
May 10, 2011
Why Atomic Energy Should Not be Used to Generate Electricity
April 29, 2011
Albert A. Gabel
Itís time to close Californiaís nuclear power plants
April 28, 2011
Beyond Nuclear petitions Nuclear Regulatory Commission for suspension of 21 U.S. atomic reactor operating licenses in wake of Japanese nuclear catastrophe
April 20, 2011
Japan disaster to level seven: "The explosion of nukespeak"
April 12, 2011
Deconstructing nuclear experts
March 31, 2011
March 20, 2011
Ralph Nader, Reader Supported News
Davis-Besse opponents, "It can happen here"
March 16, 2011
Tokyo Electric to build U.S. nuclear plants: The no-BS info on Japan's disastrous nuclear operators
March 14, 2011
Nuclear power madness
March 14, 2011
Environmental coalition defends its challenge against a 20 year license extension at Davis-Besse atomic reactor: Wind and solar can replace nuclear power, accident consequences low-balled, groups allege
March 5, 2011
The organic elite surrenders to Monsanto: What now?
January 28, 2011
Ronnie Cummins, Organic Consumers Association
Read Environment Articles by Year:
2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000