The Free Press: Speaking Truth to Power Sat Oct 11 2008
Departments
International Issues

Guantanamo as a symbol
by Ramzy Baroud
January 20, 2008

11 January marked the sixth year anniversary of the establishment of the Guantanamo detention camp. Mere months after the start of the 2001 United States invasion of Afghanistan, a large cargo plane landed in a US military base in Cuba's Guantanamo Bay, bringing in a group of hunchbacked, orange-clad, blindfolded, "terrorist" suspects, apparently representing the worst of the worst. They included children and aged men, charity workers, journalists and people who were sold to the US military in exchange for a large bounty.

The debate over this notorious prison has ever since been marred by easy reductionism. The fact is that Guantanamo is neither a warranted compound holding "bad people" -- as explained by the ever straightforward President Bush -- nor is it a dark spot in the otherwise luminous US record for respecting human rights, rules of war and international treaties. If anything, Guantanamo is a mere extension of a long list of untold violations practiced by the Bush administration, which condenses the camp to being a symbol of widespread policy predicated on nonchalantly undermining international law.

The prison is arguably one of the worst mockeries of international law, which was itself drafted partly by American legal experts. Past US administrations may not have been devoted followers of the Geneva Conventions, but neither have they ever discarded international treaties as openly and as arrogantly as the current one. Former attorney-general Alberto Gonzales, a personal friend of President Bush, mastered this art in a way that allowed his bosses to adorn their gratuitous actions with the air of legitimacy. Guantanamo was his ultimate masterpiece.

Hundreds of Guantanamo prisoners have subsequently been released, some to the custody of their respective governments. Roughly 275 remain in the camp. Out of a total of about 1,000 only 10 have been charged.

The prisoners at Guantanamo are "among the most dangerous, best trained vicious killers on the face of the earth," according to former secretary of defense Donald Rumsfeld. If that was the case, why wasn't Rumsfeld prepared to try them in a court of law? After all his self-assured judgment shows that he possessed more evidence than needed by any court to convict and throw them into jail. But, of course, the subject of evidence or lack thereof was irrelevant.

Neither habeas corpus, due process, nor any set of laws, national or international, mattered much to an administration that prided itself on its ability to transcend all of that. Of course, such disregard was justified on the basis of national interests and a whole set of tired pretences. Time, however, showed that Guantanamo, and the overriding militancy it symbolized, has probably done more damage to US national interest than any other event in US history.

In the early years, prisoners at Guantanamo were held in open air cages, with nothing but a mat and a bucket for a toilet. Anthony D Romero, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union, wrote in Salon.com, "We now know that only a small percentage of the many hundreds of men and boys who have been held at Guantanamo were captured on a battlefield fighting against Americans; far more were sold into captivity by tribal warlords for substantial bounties." Romero cites comments made by a former Guantanamo commander for several years, Brigadier General Jay Hood. The commander told the Wall Street Journal, "Sometimes, we just didn't get the right folks."

Moreover, both former secretary of state Colin Powell and current Secretary Condoleezza Rice called for the shutting down of Guantanamo, along with various international bodies and numerous rights groups in the US and abroad. But the Bush administration still persists in maintaining Guantanamo. The chances are if the Guantanamo prisoners were of any value in Operation Enduring Freedom and in the so-called global war on terror, whatever information some of them might have possessed has already been extracted, violently or otherwise. Moreover, if overwhelming evidence against them was indeed at hand, the Bush administration would have tried them long ago. Neither scenario is convincing.

Leigh Sales, writing for the Sydney Morning Herald made the dubious assessment that the "the problem is what to do with the prisoners [if the detention camp is shutdown]. If they are moved to American jails, they will have to be charged and tried under US law. Evidence gathered through coercive interrogations will not be admissible in regular courts and so Bush would risk watching the likes of Mohamed and Hambali walk free." Such commentary, emulated by others, suggests that the underlying reason behind the preservation of Guantanamo is, more or less, national interests.

However, Guantanamo is staying in business, for the exact same reason that the Iraq war rages on, and for similar reasons to why the Bush administration's failing global policy persists. Shutting down Guantanamo would be an admission of defeat, a declaration of failure, which is something that the patrons of the empire cannot afford, at least not now.

September 11 was an opportune moment to turn a new doctrine into reality, as outlined by the Project for the New American Century, a desperate attempt to sustain an empire that is facing challenges. The tactics, utilized almost immediately after the terrorist attacks, pointed at a foreign and military policy style designed to free itself from accountability to anyone, including the American people, the United Nations and international law. Guantanamo is a grotesque representation of that tactic -- and the failure of that tactic.

Indeed, Guantanamo is a dark spot in US history and shall go down in world history as a symbol of injustice and oppression. And it will continue to be a jarring reminder of the inhumanity, the torture, and the extreme violence associated with the Bush administration's so- called war on terror.

---
Ramzy Baroud (www.ramzybaroud.net) is an author and editor of PalestineChronicle.com. His work has been published in many newspapers and journals worldwide. His latest book is The Second Palestinian Intifada: A Chronicle of a People's Struggle (Pluto Press, London).


Email this article to a friend




1240 Bryden Road Columbus, Ohio 43209 Ph/Fx 614.253.2571 Email truth@freepress.org
  

Don't forget to check out articles from 2007 and 2008

International Issues

"Unofficial referendum in Vicenza, Italy: 95% opposed to new U.S. base"
  October 8, 2008
  Enzo Ciscato

"Grassroots movements, global elites and political economy in times of panic"
  October 7, 2008
  Pablo Ouziel

"The war to promote terror"
  October 4, 2008
  Robert C. Koehler

"Palestinian economy: from bad to wretched"
  September 29, 2008
  Ramzy Baroud

"Predator and prey"
  August 21, 2008
  Robert C. Koehler

"Family politics and the new Gaza crisis"
  August 20, 2008
  Ramzy Baroud

"Harper again serves as Bush's mouthpiece in Canada."
  August 19, 2008
  Jim Miles

"Thaksin is the world's newest international fugitive"
  August 19, 2008
  Richard S. Ehrlich

"Global trends that will shape the next decade"
  August 12, 2008
  Muqtedar Khan

"Obama joins the club"
  August 3, 2008
  Ramzy Baroud

"Revealing a massacre, or stating the obvious"
  July 22, 2008
  Ramzy Baroud

"Rabbi Lerner invited by Saudi King to International Interfaith Conference"
  July 15, 2008
  Tikkun

"On Iran And Mideast peace: Who is Obama trying to please?"
  June 16, 2008
  Jalal Alavi

"Burma blames Suu Kyi & fake donors for cyclone riots"
  June 2, 2008
  Richard S. Ehrlich

"Suu Kyi amid Burma's cyclone"
  May 27, 2008
  Richard S. Ehrlich

"Coexistence, not Apartheid"
  May 27, 2008
  Ramzy Baroud

"60 years of denial "
  May 17, 2008
  Ramzy Baroud

"Enemies Burma & America meet over cyclone aid"
  May 14, 2008
  Richard S. Ehrlich

"Burma stages a vote while cyclone victims suffer"
  May 11, 2008
  Richard S. Ehrlich

"The grim reality of economic truths"
  May 10, 2008
  Pablo Ouziel

"Burma blocks aid, fearing subversive foreigners"
  May 9, 2008
  Richard S. Ehrlich

"USAID team"
  May 9, 2008
  Richard S. Ehrlich

"Burma not thankful for U.S. warships offering cyclone aid"
  May 7, 2008
  Richard S. Ehrlich

"Cyclone help for Irrawaddy Delta survivors "
  May 6, 2008
  Richard S. Ehrlich

"Coups & superstitions"
  May 6, 2008
  Richard S. Ehrlich

"Trip report by former U.S. President Jimmy Carter to Israel, Palestine, Egypt, Syria, Saudi Arabia, and Jordan"
  May 4, 2008
  President Jimmy Carter

"As Italy’s elections go from bad to worse, Vicenza remains the silver lining "
  May 3, 2008
  Stephanie Westbrook

"National Lawyers Guild urges Israel to permit Richard Falk to enter Israel and the occupied Palestinian territories"
  April 26, 2008
  David Gespass, NLG

"America's secret plan to nuke Vietnam & Laos"
  April 15, 2008
  Richard S. Ehrlich

"The Spanish 'adios'"
  April 6, 2008
  Pablo Ouziel

"What else is on?"
  March 17, 2008
  Tim Buchholz

"Dayton stands (and rocks) for Darfur"
  March 13, 2008
  Christina Dendy

"The day after the bombing of Iran"
  March 13, 2008
  David Swanson

"Kosovo Brief"
  March 12, 2008
  Ivan Simic

"Kathmandu blackout"
  March 4, 2008
  Richard S. Ehrlich

"Inequality, not identity, fuels violence in Kenya"
  February 10, 2008
  Diana Duarte

"Gandhism is alive and expanding"
  February 4, 2008
  Jesse Jackson

"Guantanamo as a symbol"
  January 20, 2008
  Ramzy Baroud

"The eternal underdog"
  January 19, 2008
  Robert C. Koehler

"A perspective on relations with Somalia"
  January 4, 2008
  IGC

"Let’s toast to ten good things about 2007 "
  January 1, 2008
  Madea Benjamin

"Machiavellian Musharraf"
  January 1, 2008
  Ramzy Baroud




Read Articles by Year:
2007 2006 2005 2004
2003 2002 2001 2000




All content © 1970-2008
The Columbus Free Press
Disclaimer