The Free Press: Speaking Truth to Power Tue Mar 16 2010
Departments
International Issues

Obama’s test: democracy or chaos in Latin America
by Ramzy Baroud
October 12, 2009

Latin America stands at the threshold of a new era: one that promises a return to political uncertainty, violence and chaos or one of political stability and economic prosperity. Honduras is a crucial indicator.

The possible outcomes of the Honduran crisis are likely to define the coming era for Latin America and the US future role in that hemisphere, and, in fact, beyond it. Indeed, the story is much more elaborate than a daring president holed up in a foreign embassy in his own country.

In her second visit to Asia as US Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton declared on July 21 in Bangkok, “The US is back.” The declaration was disconcerting to many Asian countries, despite Clinton’s indistinct qualifications afterwards. Asian countries, exploring regional unity and economic cooperation are well aware of the subtle meaning of the term. However, it’s unlikely that politically stable and economically prospering Asia countries would allow for unwarranted outside interferences, especially with the growing Chinese regional influence and the election of Yukio Hatoyama the prime minister of Japan.

But how would Latin America feel about the US interference? The outcome of the Honduran coup should sufficiently answer this question.

Since the introduction of the Monroe Doctrine in 1823, the politics and economic structures of Latin American countries subsisted as a component of US foreign policies, regardless of who presided in the White House. The region’s economies seemed, at times, a laboratory for economic theories hatched at various US academic institutions. Many Latin American countries existed, and a meager existence at that, between US interventions, self-seeking local oligarchy and wilderness and chaos wrought by military dictatorships. In many instances, these three components were intrinsically linked.

But US influence in that region, as in the rest of the world, began to fade. The neoconservative wars in the Middle East and South Asia were but desperate, now failed attempts at salvaging some of the dwindling influence.

The former Bush Administration left Latin America to its own devises as US military adventures elsewhere took a toll on the country, militarily, economically and politically, at home and abroad. But as Clinton promised a return to Asia, the Obama administration attempted a return to Latin America as well, a region that is significantly different from yesteryear, as a new form of popular socialism was taking hold (in Venezuela, Bolivia, and elsewhere) without wholly disturbing the economic patterns that long governed these countries. While many didn’t welcome President Hugo Chavez’s outspokenness, few in Latin America, except for a few remaining US allies, considered him a threat. To the contrary, the new age has promised greater cooperation among all economic sectors between Latin American countries than any other period in the past. A new Latin America was making its debut, more equitable than before, politically stable, and economically promising, if not, in some cases, prosperous.

Indeed, the US returned to a different reality, a return that, at first was welcomed, even by Chavez himself. Obama spoke a language that soothed much fears and fostered a sense of promise.

“At times we sought to dictate our terms. But I pledge to you that we seek an equal partnership. There is no senior partner and junior partner in our relations; there is simply engagement based on mutual respect and common interests and shared values,” declared Obama on April 19, at the Summit of the Americas, to the pleasure and relief of his audience.

Did that mean no more coups, military interventions, economic sanctions, political intimidation and all forms of coercion that defined much of the two hemispheres’ relationship of many years? Certainly, Latin American leaders, or most of them, hoped so.

But then, the democratically elected President of Honduras, Manuel Zelaya was overthrown on June 28. It was a classic Latin American junta move. The popular leader was escorted in his pajamas and deported to another country. The coup leader, Roberto Micheletti lead a series of draconian measures, starting with the installation of a new government of allies and cronies – with the blessing of the local oligarchy – and ending with the declaration of emergency decree limiting civil liberties. After several attempts and many dramatic episodes, Zelaya returned to his country and was holed up in the Brazilian embassy, in Tegucigalpa, surrounded by a military that merely represent the very poor country’s very rich rulers: the oligarchs and the generals.

In some way, the coup in Honduras helped highlight the new order in the continent, as displayed in the unity of many Latin American countries, the steadfastness of its regional organizations, and the growing influence of the democratically elected governments. But it also highlighted the precarious position of the US administration: condemning the coup on one hand (as did President Obama, and clearly so) and condemning Zelaya’s courageous action (as did Hillary Clinton, and clearly so.) Clinton described Zelaya’s action as “reckless.” She was not alone, of course as the U.S. Ambassador to the Organization of American States, Lewis Amselem said Zelaya’s return was “irresponsible and foolish.” Zelaya should stop “acting as though he were starring in an old movie,” he counseled. Worse, US Republicans, who see the coup leaders as trusty allies reminiscent of their allies of the past, are flocking to the Honduran capital in dangerous attempts at validating the coup leaders as legitimate statesmen.

Between Obama’s anti-coup stance, and his own Department of State’s anti-Zelaya rhetoric (and Republican giddiness over the prospects of their country’s ‘return’ to Latin America), the US position lacks clarity, a dangerous notion at a time when Latin America expected a clear US divorce from the past, and “engagement based on mutual respect and common interests and shared values.” President Obama may be sincere, but he must ensure that he acts upon his promises, not for Latin America’s sake, but for his own country’s future relationship with that part of the world. As for Latin America itself, the repercussions of the Brazilian embassy’s siege, and the future of democracy in Honduras will either set a terrible precedent in an age of hope, or serve as further proof that the ghosts of the past will no longer haunt Latin America, no matter how much the reviled generals toil.

---
Ramzy Baroud (www.ramzybaroud.net) is an author and editor of PalestineChronicle.com. His work has been published in many newspapers, journals and anthologies around the world. His latest book is, "The Second Palestinian Intifada: A Chronicle of a People's Struggle" (Pluto Press, London), and his forthcoming book is, “My Father Was a Freedom Fighter: Gaza’s Untold Story” (Pluto Press, London), now available for pre-orders on Amazon.com.


Email this article to a friend




1240 Bryden Road Columbus, Ohio 43209 Ph/Fx 614.253.2571 Email truth@freepress.org
  

Don't forget to check out articles from 2009 and 2010

International Issues

"On Gaza drivers, rumors and Egypt’s steel wall"
  December 31, 2009
  Ramzy Baroud

"It's the system, stupid: The Ragnarok of globalized corporate capitalism and the rise of the planetarian paradigm "
  December 30, 2009
  James Heddle

"Palestine/Israel: A single state, with liberty and justice for all"
  December 30, 2009
  Susan Abulhawa with Ramzy Baroud

"Obama's rejection speech"
  December 11, 2009
  David Swanson

"Peace movement objects to Peace Prize"
  December 10, 2009
  Michael McPhearson and Josh Brollier

"Afghanistan: What Obama and the US Media Aren't Telling Us"
  December 4, 2009
  Evan Davis

"Columbus Free Press editors Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman speak out against sending more US troops to Afghanistan"
  December 2, 2009
  Tom Over

"Afghanistan: Our 177th Colony"
  December 1, 2009
  David Swanson

"The Meaning Of The Gift-Giving Season, According To Rev. Billy Of The Church Of Life After Shopping"
  November 28, 2009
  Tom Over

"A paradigm shift in Singapore: yet Apec offers no clear answers"
  November 25, 2009
  Ramzy Baroud

"Dissidents make noise -- oops, news "
  November 24, 2009
  Saul Landau

"Thai military wants U.S. satellites to hunt Islamist rebels"
  November 20, 2009
  Richard S. Ehrlich

"Globalization unchecked: How alien media is suffocating real culture"
  November 18, 2009
  Ramzy Baroud

"Death to no one"
  November 15, 2009
  Bitta Mostofi

"America won't lift sanctions unless Suu Kyi is freed for election"
  November 15, 2009
  Richard S. Ehrlich

"Admiral Mullen announces Afghanistan strategy: prepare to nonviolently resist"
  November 15, 2009
  Jeff Leys, Co-Coordinator of Voices for Creative Nonviolence

"America Appeals to Extradite Russia's Alleged "Merchant of Death""
  October 23, 2009
  Richard S. Ehrlich

"War, negation and Muslim identity revisited "
  October 22, 2009
  Ramzy Baroud

"Obama’s test: democracy or chaos in Latin America"
  October 12, 2009
  Ramzy Baroud

"The G-20 Announces the New World Order"
  October 1, 2009
  Michael Collins

"Crucial questions on Afghanistan war"
  September 2, 2009
  Free Press Editorial

"The scapegoat's apology"
  August 28, 2009
  Robert C. Koehler

"Fighting for the right to walk"
  August 27, 2009
  Ramzy Baroud

"The heart of the future"
  July 18, 2009
  Robert C. Koehler

"Italy to declare independence from US military"
  July 8, 2009
  David Swanson

"Israel attacks justice boat: kidnaps human rights workers, confiscates medicine, toys and olive trees"
  June 30, 2009
  Greta Berlin

"North Korea: "sanity" at the brink"
  June 27, 2009
  Michael Parenti

"A boy and an artificial leg: a Gaza story"
  June 11, 2009
  Ramzy Baroud

"Is anyone speechless?"
  June 8, 2009
  Iqbal Jassat

"Burma's Aung San Suu Kyi is on trial because an American had "A Vision" "
  June 1, 2009
  Richard S. Ehrlich

"Support U.N. Economic Crisis World Conference "
  May 22, 2009
  Ramsey Clark, winner of the 2008 U.N. Human Rights Award

"Gaza disowned: the Pope, Israel and "reconciliation" "
  May 20, 2009
  Ramzy Baroud

"Applying the lessons of Nuremburg to the USA in 2009 "
  May 19, 2009
  Paul Lehto, Juris Doctor

"Vets Speak Out! Interview with Rick Reyes"
  May 17, 2009
  Joan Brunwasser, OpEdNews

"Goliath's vulnerability is the truth"
  May 16, 2009
  Robert C. Koehler

"Harvest of suicides"
  May 11, 2009
  Vandana Shiva

"The Hague's International Criminal Court will not put Bush on trial "
  May 10, 2009
  Richard S. Ehrlich

"War without context: Fatah, Hamas and flawed language"
  May 8, 2009
  Ramzy Baroud

"CAIR's humanitarian mission to Iran "
  May 6, 2009
  Mahmoud El-Yousseph

"Sixth Nobel Nomination for Leonard Peltier"
  May 5, 2009
  Leonard Peltier Defense Offense Committee

"The international criminal court and a rogue empire"
  April 27, 2009
  David Swanson

"Wall of fear"
  April 25, 2009
  Robert C. Koehler

"The big strike"
  April 25, 2009
  Dick Meister

"Somali piracy or Somali patriotism? "
  April 20, 2009
  Steven R. Linnabary

"Israel investigated, but will it repent?"
  April 10, 2009
  Ramzy Baroud

"Intifada: A third chapter"
  March 21, 2009
  Ramzy Baroud

"American protester critically injured by soldiers in Ni'ilin"
  March 16, 2009
  AATW

"Engaging Hamas: Will history repeat itself?"
  February 28, 2009
  Ramzy Baroud

"A new Afghanistan nightmare"
  February 23, 2009
  Ramzy Baroud

"A new Afghanistan nightmare"
  February 21, 2009
  Ramzy Baroud

"Under siege again, but Gaza will not die"
  February 12, 2009
  Ann Wright, AfterDowningStreet

"The moral dead zone"
  January 20, 2009
  Robert C. Koehler

"Children of Gaza, run to the angels"
  January 12, 2009
  Suzanne Baroud

"Let Gaza live"
  January 12, 2009
  Cynthia McKinney

"Gaza: Plan of Attack"
  January 1, 2009
  Jim Miles




Read Articles by Year:
2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000




All content © 1970-2010
The Columbus Free Press
Disclaimer